Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Biological perspective vs the psychodynamic perspective
Distinguish between cultural and cross cultural psychology
Social model of mental health
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Why is an integrative perspective, one that sees value in many models, including those listed above, the wise path to take when attempting to explain, treat, and prevent mental illness? When explaining and treating mental illness and abnormal behavior, all six of the aforementioned models have shortcomings. For example, in the biological model of abnormality, biological treatments often produce unsavory side effects like severe shaking and extreme restlessness in antipsychotics. This model is also rather limiting since it says that only biological factors cause behavior; no other outside factors (like social factors, for instance). In the psychodynamic model, the theories of human behavior are all abstract ideas and therefore very difficult …show more content…
This is similar to the biological model’s problem of not considering factors other than biological factors. It is also along the same lines of the psychodynamic model in which it relies on ideas/theories that are not very physical. The humanistic-existential model’s main issue is the lack of empirical research. Similarly to the humanistic-existential model, the sociocultural model has difficulty establishing a cause from the research available. It is also difficult to predict abnormality in society using the theories of the sociocultural model. For example, if discriminated and underprivileged individuals of color tend to suffer from depression and anxiety, shouldn’t this apply to all individuals fitting these characteristics? Thoughts, feelings, and body processes all interact with each other to give us human behavior. Many forces from the inside (like psychological and biological) and outside (sociocultural) can affect the individual collectively. The integrative approach is broader and more universally applicable. By looking through the integrative approach lens, it isn’t just biological or just social as the source of our behavior; it is both combined to explain behavior. This can be accurately compared to the nature versus nurture debate (which should no longer be a debate since it is a combination of both). This broad, integrative perspective of abnormal behavior also makes it easier to prevent mental illness across different
How can at least two elements of the SEEP model be used to explain why it is important to look at more than just biological factors to understand mental health problems?
Psychodynamic approaches often come under a lot of criticism as they fail to be explicit about the underlying bases of the theory. Cognitive theories are not very comfortable with explaining emotions and behavioural theories have difficulty explaining the mechanisms of improvements.
Six hundred years ago western culture adopted the general scientific model as an unproven assumed perspective. The general scientific model developed as a phenomenon of knowledge that could be tested and replicated by all. The general scientific model presents a foundation of perception upon which theories, assumptions, and most beliefs are based off. Only confined by human limitations, the general scientific model is perceived to have endless possibilities of achievable knowledge. According to the general scientific model there are simply four basic assumptions that base the key to all knowledge: every event has a cause, causes can be known, humans can discover the causes of events, and ignorance of causes is due to improper tools (Portko,
In comparing and contrasting the definition of mental disorder in The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM–5) to the Individual Psychology perspective, one is presented with the dichotomy between the mental illness model and the mental health model. The DSM-5, driven by the use of categorizations and classifications, tends to align with a more strict mental illness, or medical model. In contrast, the Individual Psychology perspective, aims to direct focus back onto the uniqueness of each individual. Individual Psychology returns attention to the significance holistic care plays in the wellness of the individual.
Medical Model attributes mental illness to physiological, biological or genetic causes. ( Mental Healthcare, 2013) Genetic factors suggest that psychopathology is inherited from parent, through genes. Genes contain instructions for the function of each cell in the body and are sometimes responsible for how we look, act, and think. While, biology causes relates mental illnesses to an abnormal balance of brain chemicals called neurotransmitter. When neurotransmitter.is damaged, messages may not make it through to the brain correctly, or cause injury to certain areas of the brain, leading to symptoms of mental illness. Biological science has also given insight into the causes of some conditions, such as GPI and Alzheimer's disease. (McLeod, 2014) ((Hungerford,2009)
The psychodynamic approach focuses on what is occurring inside an individual’s head to get a better sense of how the client views the world. This theory is based on the interactions of drives and forces within the unconsciousness and personality within a person. According Freud, a person’s behavior is organized to satisfy drives and needs, which behavior is motivated by internal or psychological forces, which can cause an imbalance in the internal forces to motivate behavior. The concept of human nature in the psychodynamic theory is based on two distinct hypotheses, psychic determinism and dynamic unconscious (Henderson, 2016). Psychic determinism centers on the implication that the mental process are determined by the unconscious whereas
This model considers other aspects of an individual 's life such as their culture and environment. Unlike the biomedical model, the social model tries to prevent the disease in the first place, so it focuses more on educating people and health promotion. The biomedical looks at an individual’s physical disease but the social model also looks at a person’s well-being. According to Stephan Sutton, Andrew Baum and Marie Johnston (2004) the SAGE Handbook of Health psychology ‘a combination of high psychological demands, such as time pressure and low decision latitude increases the risk of psychophysiological stress reactions and subsequent ill
To think how far we have come with medicine and technology is astounding. Looking into the biological model of abnormalities we learn that the focus is to connect a medical prospective to the variations in abnormal behavior. The text uses the case of Philip Berman, a person who exhibits a wide range of emotion when triggered with certain topics. In this case researchers are looking to find a glitch between his body chemistry and his behavior. The question here is: Can there be a connection between imperfect organisms within the body which in turn display abnormal behavior? We learn from the text that the brain has many parts that are designed to specific duties. If one of the nerves or cells is faulty, can it somehow be tied to the way a person acts? The answer is yes. We know that abnormal behavior is not just that of a mental disorder, and we know that certain chromosomal disorders have been proven to cause abnormalities within the human body. In Philip’s case, it is not necessarily a behavior that we know could be caused by a glitch in the system. We learned many facts about his life that can play a role in the way he carries himself. If we were looking into his genetic inheritance we might ask questions like the genetic makeup of the family history (i.e. has there been a history of mental disorder in the family?). Was Philip used to being an only child for so
It is generally accepted within healthcare that to understand mental health we must adopt the biopsychosocial model. This model assumes that an interdependent relationship exists between biological, psychological and social factors which are involved in all aspects of mental health (Toates, 2010, p. 14). To be true to the model research must be holistic and not investigate the factors in isolation.
New drugs are being made in order to address the issue of undesirable and intolerable side effects of conventional antipsychotic drugs. Works Cited Comer, R. J. & Co., Inc. (2011). Fundamentals of abnormal psychology. New York, NY. Worth Publishers Nasar, S. (2001).A beautiful mind: the life of mathematical genius and Nobel laureate John Nash.
A theory is a set of statements that describes, explains and predicts human behavior. Development of behavior starts during the prenatal stage up to late adulthood. Three theories that help describe behavior are the perspective of Freud, Erikson and Paget’s. All three theories have several similarities as well as differences. By comparing I hope to gain a better understanding of all three theories.
The Biological Theory of mental and psychiatric disorders revolves around the brain, and that these disorders are illnesses, or diseases that cause disruptions in the brain to produce the effects of the disorder. This theory says that the brain has specific physical, chemical, or structural problems that cause abnormal behavior. The increase of technological and pharmaceutical advancements, intervention has taken the course of chemical treatment of disorders. Biological theory focuses on the brains function and dysfunction, known as neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, and genetics. Psychiatrists focus on the role of neurotransmitters and how they affect human behavior, which leads to a very loose definition of a cure, psychiatric medications. These medications correct the dysfunctions in the brain by changing the amount of neurotransmitters. However, these medications lack in efficacy in diseases like schizophrenia, where the medication only suppresses the symptoms and not the disorder itself. (Schwartz and Corcoran, 64-88).
To conclude, throughout history many models have been developed in order to explain and treat mental illness. The behavioral, psychoanalytic and humanistic model regard mental illness differently; however, they all have a common goal and that is to help the patient and attempt to understand the nature of mental illness.
Describe and evaluate the theories of Sigmund Freud's psycho dynamic approach as an explanation of human behaviour. In the evaluation summarise and evaluate the cognitive perspective as an alternative explanation of human behaviour.
I think the best, most logical, and most realistic explanation of abnormal behavior is the multicultural model, which according to the textbook is “the view that each culture within a larger society has a particular set of values and beliefs, as well as special external pressures, that help account for the behavior of its members” (62). This particular model attributes environmental and social factors as causing abnormal and dysfunctional psychological functions, because of their prominent and powerful influence on individuals’ conscious and subconscious, thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. This models also acknowledges and respects cultural diversity, while catering to these differences in ways that specifically emphasizes and celebrates these