Innocence In A Doll's House

1060 Words3 Pages

Nora Helmer, the hero in the play "A Doll 's House" by Henrik Isben, is basically a doll carrying on with the life of extravagance. She is at first ruined by her dad as a tyke, and later, ruined by her significant other, Torvald Helmer. Torvald alludes to Nora as things, for example, "… my little [twittering] songbird… "(424), and "… poor little girl"(427). This is the underlying picture tormented of Nora as the play opens. There are other key hints to who Nora genuinely is right from the opening of the play too. "She is snickering to herself, as she removes her cap and coat. She takes a pocket of macaroons from her pocket and eats maybe a couple; then goes warily to her significant other 's entryway and tunes in" (424). This infers she will do things disappointing to her better half (in the face of his good faith) with a specific end goal to satisfy her own particular delight. It is additionally unmistakably uncovered in the opening of the play that Nora took out an …show more content…

On page 432 after Mrs. Linde inquires as to whether Nora will ever tell Torvald of the advance, Nora says "Yes—some time or another maybe, after numerous years, when I am no more as pleasant looking as I am currently. Try not to giggle at me! That is to say, obviously, when Torvald is no more as gave to me as he is presently; when my moving and sprucing up and recounting have palled on him; then it might be something to be thankful for to have something available for later… " This plainly demonstrates Nora knows that Torvald thinks about her as just a trophy, a toy, a doll, with the end goal of simply his beguilement. He doesn 't consider Nora his significant other, and she knows this. "[I]t might regard have something for possible later use.." shows that when she is no more appealing, she will in any case have some kind of a hold over Torvald, further delineating her tricky and underhanded

Open Document