Infant Temperamental Psychology

1816 Words4 Pages

Psychologists study can result from more than one set of conditions, whether the observations refer to motor behaviors, verbal reports, or biological processes. This implies that the probability of discovering robust relations between a class of incentive and a category of outcome will be enhanced by looking for patterns of measures, rather than focusing on single, usually continuous, variables. (i) Infant temperament Persuasive support for the significance of patterns is found in research on high and low reactive infant temperaments. In study of infant temperament, Kagan (1994) affirmed the variation in the frequency of avoidant reactions to unfamiliar situations or people among 2-year-old children. In his study the consistently shy, avoidant …show more content…

A taxonic analysis of the infant data by Woodward, Lenzenweger, Kagan, Snidman, and Arcus (2000) and Loken’s (2001) latent class analysis of the more extensive evidence gathered from 4 months to 7 years of age affirmed the wisdom of our decision to create categories of infants based on patterns of behaviors. In addition, Fox, Henderson, Rubin, Calkins, and Schmidt (2001) have replicated some of these results and confirmed the utility of basing the classification of these two infant temperamental biases on patterns of motor activity and …show more content…

There are many reasons for this claim. First, individuals vary in their networks of representations of past feelings and images that are linked to the words. No person has conscious access to these implicit knowledge networks or their brain states, each of which can affect their verbal

Open Document