Income Inequality For All Analysis

1828 Words4 Pages

The United States of America is consider to be one of the most wealthiest countries in the world today, if not, the most wealthiest country in the world. Yet, it has the most uneven distribution of wealth of any country today. As wealthy as the country is it, it can’t even provide/doesn’t truly give the basic needs for its citizens like healthcare, housing and education. For the longest time, there’s been a wide gap between the poor/middle class and the wealthy that’s may consider to be ‘unjustified’ and the gap keeps on growing at a rapid rate. This gap is referred as income inequality. Income inequality is defined as “the extent to which income is distributed in an uneven manner among a population. In the United States, income inequality, …show more content…

Robert Reich, an American political commentator, professor, and author who was Secretary of Labor under President Bill Clinton, says “in the United States, consumer spending accounts for approximately 70 percent of economic activity.” (Robert Reich). Our economy relies on the consumers, aka you and me, to spend and put money back into the system. If we can’t do that, then that’s wrong and we’re all still going to be in trouble. In the critically - acclaimed documentary “Inequality For All,” by Jacob Kornbluth, starring Robert Reich, Reich had come up with two cycles of theories. One of these cycles being called the virtuous cycle. The virtuous cycle is a cycle of security and well-being for the U.S economy. The virtuous cycle is as follow in order: “Economy expands, productivity grows, wages increase, workers buy more, companies hire more, tax revenues increase, government invests more, workers are better educated.” (Inequality For All). They all follow a loop for the economy. However, on the flip side, there’s the vicious cycle; the polar opposite of the virtuous cycle. The vicious cycle is when the economy goes downhill. The vicious cycle is as follow in order and loops: “Deficits grow, wages stagnate, workers buy less, companies downsize, tax revenues decrease, government cuts programs, workers are less educated, unemployment rises. (Inequality For All). While these cycles were to explain the economy before and after the 1970’s, both cycles are reflected to today’s

More about Income Inequality For All Analysis

Open Document