Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare the relationship between nature and nurture
How environment can affect child development
How environment can affect child development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare the relationship between nature and nurture
Nature vs. Nurture Every person has a nature instinct and a nurture instinct inside them, but the dominance of a certain one usually depends on the person. Some people have a stronger urge to help and protect others than to better themselves, while other people have the most interest in self-preservation. It is not just what a person thinks or feels that shows their true side, but also moments of quick judgement, snap-decisions, and kill or be killed. In these times of life or death, humans usually resort to instinct, which can be considered nature. What most people may not think about is the fact that natural instinct often includes the urge to nurture. This can be shown in many moments in history, from cold blooded murder to religion to …show more content…
Unlike Perry, Dick actually had a very nice childhood with a family who loved him. When Detective Nye was questioning Dick’s parents, Mr. Hickock began explaining the life of Dick, starting with him being “‘an outstanding athlete… always the star player. A pretty good student, too, with A marks in several subjects’” (Capote 166). Although Dick had a much better childhood than Perry, he still had a very limited ability to feel compassion compared to Perry’s instinct to nurture. Dick’s lack of consideration is shown greatly when Perry recounts the events of the murder and tells the detectives that Dick said “‘I’m gonna bust that little girl.’ And I [Perry] said ‘Uh-huh. But you’ll have to kill me first… He says ‘What do you care? Hell, you can bust her, too’” (Capote 243). Dick had no regard for other people or how they feel, while Perry intervened with Dick’s self-interest in order to consider the emotions of the Clutters. Even after the murders, Dick felt no remorse for what he and Perry had just done, only feeling that they had “scored” by getting a little bit of money. The life and development of Dick show that even a nurturing environment may not contribute to a compassionate soul. The instinct to nurture may not always come from surroundings, as Dick shows, but beliefs and religions show that nature and nurture are a part of each other and both contribute to the development of a
During his childhood, Perry experienced and was marked by brutality and lack of concern on the part of both parents (Capote 296). Dr. Jones gives a very detailed description of Perry's behavior. He says that Perry, who grew up without love, direction, or m...
The inhuman and motiveless evil race upon Holcomb, destroys the peace of a small town. However, those surrounding differ their thoughts after the realizations of Dick and Perry's medical issues, "he [Perry] was under a mental eclipse, deep inside a schizophrenic [ring of] darkness” (Capote.302). Furthermore, based on medical analysis, their actions weren't in their control since they were unable to control their responses. Their past illustrates them as who they has transformed into. Perry dealt with a dysfunctional family. The troubled past Perry experienced extends out towards the rest of his life evidenced by his criminal records. On the contrary, Dick had a better childhood as compared to Perry. However, his matter of fact exudes his arrogance and malicious cruelty. Their label evolves from heartless and cold-blooded to pitiful as the truth of the crime boils down. As they have “overly sensitive to criticism” (Capote.297) ideas, they mutually struggle desperately for recognition. Their frenzied ideas prior to the murder reflects the effect of consequences. Even prior to the murder, Perry compensated for his actions, Perry wouldn’t have crippled his legs if he chose a car over a motorcycle. He could've worked properly if he didn't crippled himself. If he had a good income, it wouldn't be necessary for him to steal. He wouldn't be in jail if he didn't steal. Consequently, being in jail mirrors
In the novel, the innocent Clutter family is murdered in their own home one night, but the details of the case are not disclosed at first. The reader, however, is aware that Dick Hickock and Perry Smith embark on a nationwide road trip after committing the brutal crime. The childhoods of both characters are brought up in great detail, but the reader is especially meant to sympathize with Perry who grew up with much adversary in his life like a physical handicap, divorced parents from different states, and suicidal siblings. Because Perry did not receive much good behavioral leadership, tried to convince Dick not to follow through with the homicides, and likely had a mental illness that inhibited rational thinking, the audience was outraged when Perry Smith was sent to death row and eventually killed. In Cold Blood argues that committing a capital crime did not erase the good person that Perry was, but that he simply trusted the wrong people and made poor decisions that should not be punished by
In Truman Capote’s In Cold Blood, the author suggests the theme of crime along with his opinion of nature vs. nurture which asks the reader if the two main characters were born with evil or were raised in an environment with evil influencing them. First of all, Capote introduces one of the characters, Perry, as a “natural born killer” (55). Perry is seen as someone who possesses qualities that are ideal in order to be a successful killer. It is clearly seen that Perry’s feelings are almost absent and not there. He, himself would not be someone you would automatically think of persecuting and depicting of a killer. His gentle personality and intelligence
Dick seems to be mellow about the situation and not effected however he is. Dick is exhibiting his insecure nature by continually reassuring Perry that nothing had strayed from the perfection of his plan, while stuffing his face with food. Perry on the other hand is nervous, and as he reads about the killing in the paper his anxiety shoots up. Perry's eating habits also show his inability to eat as an effect of his
These two men, both coming from different backgrounds, joined together and carried out a terrible choice that rendered consequences far worse than they imagined. Living under abuse, Perry Smith never obtained the necessary integrity to be able to pause and consider how his actions might affect other people. He matured into a man who acts before he thinks, all due to the suffering he endured as a child. Exposed to a violent father who did not instill basic teachings of life, Smith knew nothing but anger and misconduct as a means of responding to the world. He knew no other life. Without exposure to proper behavior or responsible conduct, he turned into a monster capable of killing an entire family without a blink of remorse. In the heat of the moment, Perry Smith slaughtered the Clutter family and barely stopped to take a breath. What could drive a man to do this in such cold blood? The answer lies within his upbringing, and how his childhood experiences shaped him to become the murderer of a small family in Holcomb, Kansas. ¨The hypothesis of unconscious motivation explains why the murderers perceived innocuous and relatively unknown victims as provocative and thereby suitable targets for aggression.¨ (Capote 191). ¨But it is Dr. Statten´s contention that only the first murder matters psychologically, and that when
The whole “robbery” was planned by Dick, the drive was planned by Dick, and even the cover up process was his idea. Although he wasn’t the one who pulled the trigger, Dick is equally responsible for the Clutter family murder as Perry. It would take a horrible person to murder a family, but it takes a vial beast to plan, examine, organize, and operate the murder. Dick grew up with loving parents who were no poorer than any other family in the neighborhood. According to both him and his parents, he was a good kid who did well in school and lettered in nine sports. Similar to Perry, he feels cheated in life and is willing to do anything he must to get what he deserves. Along with this, he has zero insight on how to life a normal life. Dick is the type of person to act on his impulses. He 's likes to have a good time and live in the moment. His aspirations are easy money and easy women. With this, he seems to have no ability to weigh the consequences of his actions, and he will do whatever it takes to get his way. This type of momentary reaction is prone to lead a life of “poor decision.” If he’s in need of money, he will write a few bad checks or maybe steal from a store. If this jig wasn’t plentiful enough, he hitches a ride with a stranger to basically rob and kill everyone in the car. Dick was known for being a terrible person as one man stated, “Dick Hickock! Don 't talk to me about
Dick had a good life going, he just didn't feel like it went the way he wanted it too. He was popular, smart, an athlete just wasn't enough for him. On the other hand, Perry had a bad life. He was between foster homes, and even had his siblings and father commit suicide while his mother drank herself away. Putting all that together i learned that, Nurture plays the biggest role in life. It has the ability to determine weather you turn a good life into and complete wreak such as Dick Hickock had. In a way it also applies to Perry considering his life was a wreck all the way
Richard Mulcaster, a British instructor of English, once wrote, “Nature makes the boy toward, nurture sees him forward.” Mulcaster recognizes that both genetic and environmental factors determine the type of a person one becomes. Truman Capote’s nonfiction novel, In Cold Blood gives the reader an opportunity to see prime examples of how nature and nurture influence one’s character. Capote’s novel, In Cold Blood introduces the reader to two men; Richard Eugene Hickock known as Dick throughout the novel, and Perry Edward Smith whose lives of crime are almost identical; although both Perry and Richard come from very humble backgrounds, their childhood particularly their family life, has very little in common. It is not until later in their lives that we begin to see similarities between the two men. Despite their differences, Perry’s upbringing and Dick’s genetic disposition allow both men to share a disregard for life, which becomes apparent on the night they gruesomely burglarized and murdered four innocent members of the Clutter family.
In Truman Capote’s famous non-fiction novel, In Cold Blood, there is evidence that supports the injustices of the trial: death penalty. The final outcome of the trail was never to be any different than death. “Of all the people in all the world, the Clutters were the least likely to be murdered” (Capote 85). We know the two men who killed the Clutter family, Perry Smith and Bill Hickock, preplanned the crime with malice and forethought. Although the actions were crul and grusome, does Death Row fit what they did if their pasts, childhood environments and situation, are bad. Capote shows the effect of childhood on the killers and if the death penalty is fair. Capote gives the killers a voice to show their humanity by giving childhood accounts of their lives. He questions the justice of is the death penalty fair, and if inherent evil is a product of childhood or society. Is it nature or nurture? Capote gives a look into the minds of the killers and the nature vs. nurture theory. The detailed account the killers’ childhoods makes the reader sympathize with the Clutter family’s killers Smith and Hickock. Should they reserve the death penalty? Did Truman Capote take a stand on the death penalty? By giving the readers a detailed accounting of Perry Smith’s and Dick Hickock’s childhood, Capote sets up the reader for nurture vs. nature debate on the death penalty. The question then becomes, do the effects (if any) caused by environment in childhood make for a trained killer or a natural born one?
Perry Smith was a short man with a large torso. At first glance, “he seemed a more normal-sized man, a powerful man, with the shoulders, the arms, the thick, crouching torso of a weight lifter. [However] when he stood up he was no taller than a twelve-year old child” (15). What Smith lacked in stature, he made up in knowledge. Perry was “a dictionary buff, a devotee of obscure words” (22). As an adolescent, he craved literature and loved to gain insight of the imaginary worlds he escaped into, for Perry’s reality was nothing less than a living nightmare. “His mother [was] an alcoholic [and] had strangled to death on her own vomit” (110). Smith had two sisters and an older brother. His sister Fern had committed suicide by jumping out of a window and his brother Jimmy followed Fern’s suit and committed suicide the day after his wife had killed herself. Perry’s sister, Barbara, was the only normal one and had made a good life for herself. These traumatic events left Perry mentally unstable and ultimately landed him in jail, where he came into acquaintance with Dick Hickock, who was in jail for passing bad checks. Dick and Perry became friends and this new friendship changed the course of their lives forever. Hickock immediately made note of Perry’s odd personality and stated that there was “something wrong with Little Perry. Perry could be such a kid, always wetting his bed and crying in his sleep. And often [Dick] had seen him sit for hours just sucking his thumb. In some ways old Perry was spooky as hell. Take, for instance, that temper of his of his. He could slide into a fury quicker than ten drunk Indians. And yet you wouldn’t know it. He might be ready to kill you, but you’d never know it, not to look at it or listen to it” (108). Perry’s short fuse and dysfunctional background were the two pieces to Perry’s corrupt life puzzle that soured and tainted the final “picture”.
...he killed all four Clutters so that Dick's mom wouldn't worry about her son being a murderer when he really wasn't. Perry once wondered if there was something wrong with them that they could kill four people for a little money and get away with it. Perry Smith shows remorse for killing the Clutters.
job that he has at the moment is only his because Eddie got it for
Undoubtedly, humans are unique and intricate creatures and their development is a complex process. It is this process that leads people to question, is a child’s development influenced by genetics or their environment? This long debate has been at the forefront of psychology for countless decades now and is better known as “Nature versus Nurture”. The continuous controversy over whether or not children develop their psychological attributes based on genetics (nature) or the way in which they have been raised (nurture) has occupied the minds of psychologists for years. Through thorough reading of experiments, studies, and discussions however, it is easy to be convinced that nurture does play a far more important in the development of a human than nature.
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what