Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of financial development on economic growth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of financial development on economic growth
The term investor protection defines the entity of efforts and activities to observe safeguard and enforce the rights and claims of a person in his role as an investor. Investor protection is necessary because in many countries expropriation of minority shareholders and creditors by the controlling shareholders is extensive. Expropriation means the insiders (the managing shareholders and the managers) use the profits to benefit themselves rather than return the money to investors. The absence of investor protection the investors would not be needed to pay back the creditors or to distribute profits amongst shareholders, which would lead to a breakdown of the external financial mechanism. Investor protection is important of the greater security …show more content…
When they are protected from expropriation investors pay more securities which is beneficial to both creditors and shareholders. When creditor’s rights are protected it would encourage them to lend more. The Shareholder’s rights are encouraged as measured by the valuation of firms, the number of listed firms and the rate at which the firms go public. In the shareholders and creditors eyes the protection is not only the rights written as laws but also the effectiveness of their enforced. The countries that protect their investors have a higher stock market and the companies have a higher IPO (initial public offering) .Investor protection influences the real economy through its effect on the financial market. Economic growth can be accelerated through financial development in three different …show more content…
When the Japanese government was thriving in the 1980’s bank based corporate governance system was better because it enabled banks to provide loans to firms for long term investment projects. Banks were able to provide loans to firms that underperformed, facing cash flow problems as to avoid a financial disaster. The Japanese economy collapsed in the 1990’s due to the fact that the Japanese banks over lent to firms that were in decline and required a wholesale reorganization. The Japanese banks worked alongside with the entrepreneurs to discourage outside investors who were a threat to their control and to collect rent on the bank
The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the article called “Can We Keep Our Promises?” by Robert D. Arnott, and to help better understand the three key risks facing each investor.
Japan has experienced great economy recovery after World War II, thanks to America’s financial assistance and the rapid development of heavy industry. It became the first Asian country that hosted Tokyo Olympics Games in 1964 and Osaka World Expo in 1970, reaching an average annual economic growth of more than 10 percent, becoming the world's second largest economy in 1970s and achieving 30 years of economic growth until the 1980s. Implicated by the appreciation of the Yen and low interest rate policy, however, Japan has underg...
Graham, John R., Sonali Hazarika, and Krishnamoorthy Narasimhan. "Corporate Governance, Debt, and Investment Policy during the Great Depression." NBER. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011. Web. 24 Apr. 2014.
To try to combat the trend of failing banks, the Bank of Japan Governor, Masaru Hayami, started a “zero interest rate policy” in 1999. This move built confidence in Japanese banks and the Japanese economy. However, this positive reform did not last. Banks were not using this recovery policy to write off their bad loans. They also did not get rid of very risky stock market shares. Hayami became fed up with the actions of the banks and raised interest rates in August of 2000. Then when the stock market began falling, those risky shares that the banks owned caused them to lose even more money.
Herring, R. (2002) International Financial Conglomerates: Implications for Bank insolvency Regimes. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
But the stakeholders play a very important role in preventing and deterring fraud. Stakeholders includes customers, suppliers, employees, the community and the government. Each play an important role since they have an interest in the integrity of financial reports of the publicly-traded company. Employees have a vested interest in the company’s success and they have a responsibility to protect their interest. Their roles may start from the bottom but they are key players in the company. To help deter or prevent financial statement fraud, the employee must report financial reporting fraud if it is detected. This can be done by way of a vigorous whistleblower program of some other tip line provided by the company. The community and its members, including the news media, can play a regulator role by confirming that the company is a good citizen with fair business practices. Shareholders should make sure that any company in which they’d like to invest is in compliance with standards of oversight and ethics. Investors need to play and active role also. They should be actively involved by monitoring the companies in which they invest. They should attend shareholder’s meeting regularly to discuss concerns and check the books of the company. This will allow them to stay current with what is going on within the company. Shareholders should always remain vigilant and make
For example, that a computer industry in China is immature that it cannot compete with the same industries from other countries in foregin markts. And let’s suppose that the industry will eventually earn a considerable amount of profit when it grows out. In such case, the buisness owners are and should be willing to endure the short-term losses for the long run profit. Thus protections are not even neccessary. As a matter of fact, most companies nowadays—such as Facebook—were operating under deficit with hopes of growing gains in the future. And most of them have succedded without any protection from
While the company usually cannot have any direct impact on them stakekeepers can constrain or impose regulations (Fassin 2009). Fassin (2009) finds some analogy between the stakekeeper and the term gatekeeper as it works as an outside and independent observer who has some power to scrutiny, screen and grade to some level. As it was described by Coffee (2006) Stakekeeper usually provide verification and certification for investors and “act by pledging their reputational capital to the corporation”. Using this definition we discuss the Stakekeepers disclosed by Coca-Cola
Stockwin, J. A. Chapter 7: Who Runs Japan? In Governing Japan: Divided Politics in a Resurgent Economy (4th ed., pp. 46-72). London, The United Kingdom: Blackwell.
The bank failure in Jamaica illustrates how negative mindsets and behaviors can devastate the financial system and disrupt economic growth. The primary role of any bank is to safeguard its customer’s money, offer interest rate on deposits, lend money to creditworthy individuals, and make sound investment decisions to maximize shareholder value. Because of rapid economic growth between the late 1980s and early 1990s in Jamaica, the Central National Bank (CNB) and Worker’s Savings and Loans Bank (WSLB) loosened their monetary policies, provided preferential interest rates and extended credit beyond what was reasonable to members of its own board of directors, managing directors, and officers of the bank. These actions posed significant risks to the bank and its future.
Stakeholders are those groups or individual in society that have a direct interest in the performance and activities of business. The main stakeholders are employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers, financiers and the local community. Stakeholders may not hold any formal authority over the organization, but theorists such as Professor Charles Handy believe that a firm’s best long-term interests are served by paying close attention to the needs of each of these stakeholders. The modern view is that a firm has responsibilities to all its stakeholders i.e. everyone with a legitimate interest in the company. These include shareholders, competitors, government, employees, directors, distributors, customers, sub-contractors, pressure groups and local community. Although a company’s directors owes a legal duty to the shareholders, they also have moral responsibilities to other stakeholder group’s objectives in their entirely. As a firm can’t meet all stakeholders’ objectives in their entirety, they have to compromise. A company should try to serve the needs of these groups or individuals, but whilst some needs are common, other needs conflict. By the development of this second runway, the public and stakeholders are affected in one or other way and it can be positive and negative.
Although primary objective for managers is to maximise shareholders’ wealth, but many firms are started to focus on other stakeholders’ interests in recent years. Company can prevent transfer the damage of stakeholders’ wealth to shareholders when focus on stakeholders’ interests. In other words, “social responsibility” for the companies is to maintenance stakeholders’ relations in order to provide long-term interests to shareholders. By this way, conflict, turnover and litigation of stakeholders can be minimise. Obviously, company can achieve their primary objective by cooperation with stakeholders instead of conflict with stakeholders (Smart, Megginson, Gitman, 2002).
He goes on to explain how they are treated as completely separate from the companies in which they hold shares and receive dividends yet they are not responsible for the company’s debts or liabilities. Furthermore, the companies in which the hold shares must be run in their best interests. Therefore, the interests of the company, which is a separate legal entity, is directly linked with those of the shareholders. “The law treats separate legal personality very seriously in some contexts (shareholders liabilities) while ignoring it in others (shareholder primacy, shareholder control rights).
Life is loaded with dangers and instabilities since, we are social individuals; we have certain obligations too to minimize these dangers. Since we are individuals we have faith in future instead of the present and craving to have a superior and secured future. In such manner, an extra security administration has its own particular worth as far as serving as reserve funds, speculation and danger assurance. As indicated by Raja (1998) Protection is the pooling of serendipitous misfortunes by exchange of such dangers to back up plans (Insurance agencies), who consent to repay safeguarded, for such misfortunes, to give other monetary advantage on their event or to render administrations
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Improving Business Behavior: Why we need Corporate Governance. Oct. 2004. OECD.