Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on implicit biases
The implicit association test results
The implicit association test results
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on implicit biases
The IAT primarily relates to Chapter 13 of the textbook because it tests attitudes and stereotypes that people have. The textbook describes stereotyping as the process by which people make inferences about others based on the knowledge that they have of the categories that others belong in. The IAT takes the lesson from the textbook a step further by looking specifically at implicit stereotypes and differentiating them from explicit stereotypes. For example, common stereotypes that people may or may not be aware they have, such as stereotypes having to do with race and gender, are listed in the textbook. Correspondingly, there are IATs that test implicit attitudes toward both of these characteristics of people. Furthermore, though the textbook mentions the limitations of using stereotypes (inaccurate categorization, overuse, and …show more content…
However, after reading the background and explanation of the IAT, I understand that the test is made specifically to evaluate the implicit preferences a person may have. This means that the IAT seeks to reveal preferences that a person consciously does not have access to. This made both of the tests results more believable. If I don't consciously have access or knowledge of these implicit beliefs, I shouldn’t be surprised that I received unexpected test results.
c. My weight IAT results fits with my own experience in my head and probably in my behavior. I was not surprised by my weight IAT test results because, although it was revealed by the IAT that I have an implicit preference for a certain weight, I am consciously aware that I have an explicit preference. Because of this conscious awareness that I have, I am sure it reflects in both my behavior and in my thoughts. The results of the second IAT that I took, the race IAT, surprised me. Because of this, it did not fit with my own experience at all—neither in head nor behavior because I did not think I had a
The method primarily used throughout research was the Implicit Association Test (IAT). This test is a measure used in the study of social psychology that is used to predict a person’s first association between different mental representations in one’s memory. In these particular studies the IAT is used to detect one’s behaviors, judgements, and decisions suggestive of ethnic and racial discrimination (Oswald, Mitchell, Blanton, Jaccard, & Tetlock, 2007). This test is usually done through technology. In the race IAT, participants would sit in front of the computer and be shown a variety of black faces and white faces. They were also told that one button on the keyboard is associated with the word “old” (negative),
The Project Implicit, Harvard Education is a non-profit organization that seeks to collect data on an individual’s subconscious chooses. The test that I took was the Race IAT (Implicit Association Test), which measures and shows an individual’s implicit belief and attitudes that one may not be unwilling to admit that they have (Teachman, Nock, 2011). So, this test was an attempt to see if I have biases that I do not really know about. This is interesting and scary at the same time. To have someone basically interpret your thoughts through a series of unrelated responses.
After taking this personality test, I agree or disagree with the outcomes. First, when it comes to the open-mindedness personality section, I feel like I should be in the middle because I’m more open-minded, I am always willing to try new things or to hear and consider new
This allowed people to write down all stereotypes they know of African Americans. The results showed that both low and high prejudice groups wrote down similar stereotypes and therefore there was no significant differences between the groups and any category. “High- and low-prejudice persons are indeed equally knowledgeable of the cultural stereotype (Devine, 1989).” Although this is the case for both high- and low-prejudice persons, this does not mean that consciousness of a stereotype equals the influence and inevitability of prejudice. “The inevitability of prejudice approach, however, overlooks an important distinction between knowledge of a cultural stereotype and acceptance or endorsement of the stereotype” (Ashmore & Del Boca, 1981; Billig, 1985). Knowing about versus actually believing in stereotype are two very different things: “Beliefs can differ from one’s knowledge about an object or group or one’s affective reaction toward the object or group (Pratkanis, in press).” Therefore, while stereotypes are automatically activated, beliefs require conscious
The concept of stereotypes is what we have been created in our presumptions of a person without even having an idea of how they are. It is a common thing in our society on which sometimes it can create tolerance or intolerance toward other groups because of different ideas or traditions. The film by Gregory Nava My Family and the book by Victor Martinez Parrot in the Oven: Mi Vida are clear examples of the concept of stereotypes. In addition, the film Real Women Have Curves by Patricia Cardoso demonstrates some of the ways stereotypes can affect one’s own ethnic group. Racial stereotypes can be good or bad creating influences toward a group. In this case, stereotypes can create bad influences causing misperceptions, confusion within the same
The creation of the implicit associations test was to find out if there is a way to determine if it is possible to actually know the inner feelings that someone has, but that they may not be able or willing to report. It may also be a way for someone to determine if their explicit attitudes line up with their implicit attitudes and be able to know themselves a little better than they did before. Before taking the tests, I decided which four that I felt had the most relevance towards myself. I chose one based on my preferences for religion because I consider myself a religious person and have respect and an interest in religious teachings. Two of the tests I chose were based on that I am, ever so slightly, part of that race; The Asian and Native American IAT. The fourth and final test I chose was the weapons IAT and I ch...
It may seem ridiculous that we make decisions based on thoughts that we do not even know we are having, but it is certainly true. This test has really opened my eyes to the fact that although I considered myself very open-minded, even I have a slight bias in some regards. The most important lesson from this is that awareness is the key, and these biases will forever be engrained in our subconscious if we do not take the time to face them. Although I found this a tough pill to swallow, I and the people I meet henceforth will benefit from the knowledge I have gained
With this he came up with two fundamental concepts in relation to the overall test. This was in tandem with the different cognitive functions of different members (Myers I. B., 1987). He concluded that there were the ‘rational’ or judging functions and the ‘irrational’ or perceiving functions. The rational functions included the thinking and feeling aspect to it, while the irrational entailed the sensation and intuition aspect (Myers I. B., 1995). This was further subdivided into four opposite pairs with a possibility of 16 other possible psychological types. They include intuition (N), extraversion (E), judgment (J), sensing (S), feeling (F), thinking (T), introversion (I) and perception (P) (Myers I. B., 1995).
Prejudice, discrimination, and stereotyping are important topics at the cause of debating within social psychology. A stereotype is a generalization about a group of people, in which certain traits cling to all members, regardless of actual individual variation (Akert, Aronson, & Wilson, 2010). As humans, people assign objects and individuals into categories to organize the environment. Individuals do this for not only organization, but also survival. Is stereotyping inevitable? That is the question; according to Devine (2007), it is, but Lepore and Brown (2007) have to disagree. Devine believes that “stereotyping is automatic, which makes it inevitable.” On the other hand, Lepore and Brown are not convinced that stereotyping is automatic, and have claimed, after observation, that it depends on the individual.
Stereotyping, discrimination and prejudice are phenomena that motivate animated debate amid the scholars as well as the public. Many ponder on which acts should be deemed discriminatory, when they can come to a conclusion that a decision or a social guideline preference is actually founded on prejudice and the role played by prejudice in creating gender and racial disparities. Also of immense interest are queries regarding how the society should react to these problems and whether they have been dealt with in a pleasing manner. Social psychologists lunge into this dispute equipped with scientific method, hoping to gather evidence that can shed the much needed light on these continuing worries. In particular, this paper seeks to shed some light as to why stereotypes and prejudices occur in the mind of perceivers, as well as the manner and under which circumstances they are most likely to manipulate perceivers’ explicit behavior.
In general, cognitive psychology zeroes in on the processes at work between sensation and behavior. The decision making module in ZAPS is a great example supporting the notion that humans are not rational thinkers. Statistically we were asked the same questions and given the same options and statistical outcomes. However, as a class we gave different answers to the same scenarios. Decision making is the in-between transition converting sense into action, and it is this in-between that produced the changes in our answers to essentially the same questions. Cognitive psychology is used day to day, hence this ZAPS experiment applies to ordinary life as well. As discussed in class, surveys can take advantage of principles of framing and anchoring to bias answers, whether on purpose or inadvertently. As scientists it is our responsibility to use this knowledge and make our bias-free experiments. Overall the decision making ZAPS exercise was extremely useful in connecting what we learned in class regarding phenomenon to raw data, and demonstrating how relevant these phenomenons are in day to day
After taking this personality test I could not decide if I felt that my results were accurate about me or not. The personality test resulted in describing me as an extravert, intuitive, feeling, and judging (Humanmetrics,
Having completed the Myers Briggs Personality Test previously, I was identified as an INTP, which stands for introverted, intuitive, thinking, and perceiving. Accordingly, this personality is often labeled as “The Architect” or “The Logician.” Despite my previous results, I repeated the test as instructed in the assignment. Consequently, based on the outcome of the test, my personality has altered in the past year. Thus, my updated results based on this analysis were, INTJ (introverted, intuitive, thinking, and judging). However, the two personalities are not vastly different, as only one trait seems to have varied. Therefore, instead of a holding characteristic grounded in perception, it would appear that I am more inclined to mannerisms
Ultimately, the test reflected many accurate elements of my personality traits but the consummate individualist that I am urges me to find objection. As the disclaimer below states depending on the accuracy of your responses to the questions-- which may vary day to day, year to year, mood to mood -- the result of the Jung test will change.