Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Israel palestine conflict introduction
Analyze the causes of the Arab Israeli conflict
Analyze the causes of the Arab Israeli conflict
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Israel palestine conflict introduction
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as a whole, can be broken down into a family dispute. Two brothers fighting over ancestral land, all the while the uncle, who oversteps his, limits all the time, and then claims to put the fighting to the end by taking over the responsibilities for a time. Britain, the uncle, was very keen on partitioning the land of Palestine, into Palestine and Israel, by dividing the territory around the settlements. No one was happy with this decision, and therefore it was scrapped. Hypothetically, many have wondered, David Ben-Gurion himself concluded,1 that if the Peel Commission was accepted, would those 6 million Jews have survived, or would they have the same fate?2 I cannot give an answer to this question, as the whole state of the conflict is a what-if scenario from the first thought of granting land from mandated Palestine to the Jews, so they could create homes in proper settlements on what they claimed to be the ancestral land to today, when there is still a constant bitterness between the Israelis and Palestinians. Except, no matter where you look on this matter, no matter how many books are written and read, debates on articles, or bombs on busses, the central question to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is; would the Peel Commission succeeded had it been passed in 1937? Lord William Peel, 1st Earl Peel, was the youngest son of Sir Robert Peel. Sir Robert Peel was Britain’s Prime Minister from 1834-1835, and then again, 1841-1846. During his second term he re-introduced Income Tax into the Federal Budget, to help with the economic recession that was happening in 1942. Perhaps this is where Lord William Peel gets inherited his willingness to solve problems; to see everyone at peace with each other, ... ... middle of paper ... ... in opinions. 15 Caplan, Neil; Israeli- Palestinian Conflict: Shoah, Atzma’ut, Nakba: 1939’, pg 119 knowledge of what happened, but speaking with more of an, if anyone took a moment to think about this, how wouldn’t have they noticed an indication to the coming terror. Hitler never hid his intention and neither did the events of operation hummingbird16. So were these all just repercussions to not accepting the Partition plan of 1939, and instead accepting a version of it in 1947? No matter how many questions are answered, there will always be many more to take its place. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict may seem to be just another what-if, and understandably, it’s hard to look at what happened without the knowledge of what happened, and maybe for that reason, the Peel Commission, is still silently being persistent, even after falling between the cracks of history. 16
...Palestine. The main points of the White Paper put the plans for partition as impractical and enforced restrictions on Jewish immigration and the transfer of land. The White Paper said that with the Jewish population at 450,000 having been settled in the mandate, the points in the Balfour Declaration have been met. “His Majesty’s Government therefore now declare unequivocally that it is not part of their policy that Palestine should become a Jewish State.” Even though much hope seemed to be lost at this point, faced with the impending Nazism in Europe, Zionist Jews and non-Zionist Jews had felt the pressure to unite and thus led to the Biltmore Conference.
Hamilton also showed his influence in the development of the country’s taxation policies. He set up funding programs to pay off the now large national debt.... ... middle of paper ... ...
The Death of Lord Liverpool as the Most Important Reason for the Collapse of the Tory Ministries
...of the situation, "The position of the Jews in liberated countries is desperate. The political pressure in Palestine is becoming unbearable. And so is my personal position as President of the Jewish agency. This is the hour to eliminate the British White Paper, to open the doors of Palestine and to proclaim the Jewish state" (Ganin). The British negative attitude gave the militant Zionists who wanted a new policy towards England and for new activist leadership a reason to take action. They felt, "...it's astonishing how fast they forgot about that..." (Silverberg). The Zionist leaders saw that after World War Two, Britain was exhausted economically and psychologically. British power had weakened because of the war. The Jewish community realized that they would not be able to rely on Britain for help and so they turned all their attention to the United States (Ganin).
...m. A part of the problem today in this conflict is the people not willing to change or go along with what their leaders enforce and their ideas. There have been many acts of aggression from the Jews themselves because they didn’t feel Palestine’s should receive land. Civil disobedience and acting out is a cause to making the conflict last longer.
On November 29, 1947, the United Nations voted for a partition resolution that led to the establishment of the nation of Israel in May, 1948. This was great news for Jews in Palestine and the diaspora as it meant the fulfillment of the quest for the rebirth of their nation in their previous homeland after many years of wandering (Pappe, 2006, p. 12). However, their Palestinian Arab counterparts opposed to the establishment from the start felt cheated by the international community and remained categorical that the final answer to the Jewish problem would only be solved in blood and fire (Karsh, 2002, p. 8).
Given current conditions, a fully independent Palestinian State would threaten peace in the region, despite the fact that the Palestinians were the original inhabitants within recent history, and therefore theoretically have the right to the Palestinian area. This is not, however, an excuse to resume Israel’s current treatment of Palestinians. At minimum, Palestinians deserve full access to non-settlement areas of the west bank regardless of Israel’s desire to control and restrict access to roads connecting settlements, reasonably open access to East and/or West Jerusalem, and the same rights as an Israeli citizen within the legal system. To continue forcing poor conditions on Palestinians will only amplify resistance, and consequently, violent
The Israeli-Palestine conflict is an event that has been well documented throughout the course of Middle-Eastern history. The conflict dates back as far as the nineteenth century where Palestine and Zionist, will later be known as Israel, are two communities each with different ideologies had the same overwhelming desire to acquire land. However, what makes this clash what it is, is the fact that both of these up and coming communities are after the same piece of land. The lengths that both sides went to in order obtain they believed was theirs has shaped the current relationship between the two nations today.
Ultimately despite their best intentions, the British had set themselves up for an inevitable failure by making opposing arrangements that could not be satisfied simultaneously. Hence, the British were doomed by their own ambivalence. The British promises based off a strategy of short-term military and political gains only led to disappointment on both sides, increasing tensions between the opposing parties. However, we must remember that the United States, Zionist terrorist groups, economic issues, and the United Nations all contributed to preventing Britain from fulfilling its promises and mending the conflict. These factors however only accelerated and confirmed the inevitable outcome of an Arab-Israeli war, which was spurred on due to tension created by Britain’s contradictory promises.
One of the major issues between Palestinians and the Israelis is the unresolved issue of Palestinians not having an independent homeland. The Palestinians will continue to resist Israel until they have obtained a land of their own separate from Israel. In 1947, the United Nation proposed a Partition Plan that would separate the land between the Jews and the Arabs. The Arabs turned the United Nation down, even though that would have resulted in them gaining their own land. In return the Jews decided to declare their own independent state, Israel. After declaring its self an independent state a war broke out between Israel and Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Palestinian, and Iraq. During the...
Sir Robert Peel was a social reformist, who filled in as Executive, Home Secretary, and in different workplaces amid his lifetime. Amid his chance as Leader, Peel passed current enactment tending to common
Conflicts between people often have multiple causes and effects. A majority of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is an argument that dates back to Biblical times. The Jewish argue Palestine was the historical site of all Jewish kingdoms, which was promised to Abraham and his descendants. The Arabs argue that Ishmael, forefather of Arabs, is the son of Abraham so God’s promise that the land should go to Abraham’s descendents includes Arabs as well . Some of the main causes which worsen the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are the disparity between Sykes-Picot agreement and Balfour Declaration, The United Nation Partition plan of 1947, which was the separation of the boundaries, and Hitler’s Final Solution. While these causes affected both sides
This destroyed the way of life for many Palestinians. So, they rejected the idea. Then, several Arab states attacked the newly created Israel. Israeli forces then basically wiped over four hundred Palestinian villages and cities off the face of the earth, and to make matters more intense, when the Palestinians tried to return to their homes, they found that Israel had not only taken them over, but had barred the Palestinians from entering what had once been their homes. Those that had not left became second class citizens, and soon, the numbers of Palestinian refugees numbered in the millions. Most of the refugees went to, and still are in, the Gaza Strip, West Bank, or
Israel successfully fought off the pan-Arab army while other Israeli combatants terrorized and depopulated the countryside. Ilan Pappe termed the depopulation of Palestinians as “ethnic cleansing” but can this phrase be properly used when discussing the events of 1947-1948? To answer this question one must determine if there is a well-established definition of the phrase ‘ethnic cleansing’ and also establish that this was the intent of the Zionists, both initially and subsequently. This can be determined by examining Zionist policy and action previous to the U.N partition plan and after, which will demonstrate that the term is appropriately applied to the situation by Pappe.
The issue of Palestine and Israel is one that has been hotly contested for over a thousand years. The last fifty years have been especially important in the history of the Jewish people and Palestinians. Since the death of Yasser Arafat on the 11th of November 2004 , and the election of Mahmoud Abbas as his successor as leader of the Palestinian Authority, significant steps have been taken towards a lasting peace. This will hopefully lead to a conclusion of the second Palestinian intifada, which began in late September 2000, and to an end of the oppression of the Palestinian people by the Israeli Defense Forces. Both Jews and Arabs have suffered heavily from the conflict, thousands of innocent civilians have died on both sides, and peace is in the interests of all.