Impermissibility Of Abortion

1078 Words3 Pages

Abortion is one of the most, if not the most controversial issue around the world between genders, classes, religions, races and more. The true definition of abortion is the premature exit of a fetus from the uterus. It ends the pregnancy before the fetus is able to live outside of the mother and fully develop. People have pondered over the true meaning of what abortion is and if it should be morally acceptable in society today. People have different opinions over the topic, making it a general debate. Many factors are taken in to account regarding abortions, ultimately giving three common views created by three famous philosophers.
Around the world people have various standpoints as to why abortion is either morally acceptable or not, falling …show more content…

Thompson, a pioneer on the moderate side, suggests that abortion is in fact sometimes morally permissible. Her main goal was to not only argue for abortions permissibility, but to challenge some of the common arguments presented for the impermissibility of abortion. Explaining her goals, she argues that a fetus has a right to life. But the question is what does it mean to have the right to life? Well, in some cases, a right solely means entitlement and in other cases, it means a certain kind of claim that one has against another. Thomson presents that the right to life does not mean it is the right to have the bare minimum needed for survival. Presenting the famous violinist case, she explains the storyline of a person who wakes up and is attached to a famous violinist. If the individual decides to detach him or herself, the violinist dies unless they stay attached for several months to save him. This case symbolizes the correlation between abortion and rape. Meaning, having an abortion, like detaching from the violinist, is morally permissible in cases where the pregnancy is not wanted. Her argument, using the case, claims that abortion in the case of rape is in fact morally permissible. With is then clear that Thomson rejects that the fetus’s right to life outweighing the mothers right to decide what she wants. In other cases, abortion is an unjust killing. However, she does note her argument may not be satisfactory to all proponents of the moral permissibility of

Open Document