Imperial Eyes By Mary Louise Pratt: Book Review

1510 Words4 Pages

When World War II ended and Japan lost control over Korea, the country split politically. The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, USSR, now occupied the area north of the 38th parallel, while the United States occupied the area south. This split led to the founding of the Republic of Korea in the South, and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea in the North. With unresolved strains of being a divided nation and global tensions present because of the Cold War, the Korean War broke out between the North and the South. The border was never meant to be permanent because both governments considered themselves to be the legitimate government of Korea, with hopes of one day unifying Korea into one again. The fight spiraled into open fire when …show more content…

This lens focuses on two diverse cultures that are geographically and historically separated, coming together to form contact zones. These contact zones are the physical space in which the two cultures, in this case South Korea and America, meet and interact with one another.3 The interesting aspect of these contact zones is that they create connections with not only people directly in the contact zones, but also with people from distant lands. During this time democracy was unstable in the United States as well. There was a strain that resided between the republican idea of the common good and the liberal concept of individual freedom. Because there was no one definition of democracy that existed, there was no one definition of democracy to promote. Jooyoung Lee explains in this article, “Forming a Democratic Society: South Korean Responses to U.S. Democracy …show more content…

Pratt defines transculturation as a phenomena in the contact zone where the less dominate culture picks and chooses what aspects of the dominate culture they wish to take on in their own culture.9 Although Koreans predominantly agreed with the American Democracy ideal, there were aspects they did not concur with. For example, Koreans were not keen on the American democracies “materialistic” and “individualistic” nature. Instead, they ignored American individualism and created their own definition and approaches to achieving individualism.10 Disagreeing with some aspects of American democracy was not the only reason South Korean democracy differed from American. South Koreans also recalled their nations past opposition with Japan to form their own version of democracy. “The student protestors not only used democratic ideas, but also drew from post-colonial nationalist discourses, their patriotic fervor, and general ideas about justice”.11 This version of democracy that was created, built the foundation upon which South Korea would build its new

Open Document