Impact Of Modernism In Modern Theatre

1189 Words3 Pages

The ‘Modern’ era began, approximately, in the mid-1800s (Worthen), following its predecessor the Romantic period, which was an era that was emotionally charged ad focused on the physical relationships between characters and being one-with-nature, rather than the focus of the modernist period, which was to bring social and political issues or statements into the storyline of a script whilst still keeping the stage, characters and overall performance aesthetically pleasing for the audience of the particular period. Modernism in the theatre is the act of bringing the stage and the forms of modern life, at one time, to a critical relationship. As stated by Worthen, the modernist period or the modern world we live in today began in the mid-1800s …show more content…

Ibsen was described as a modernist for many reasons, his opinions on feminism, his play structure and his understanding of his modern context. He was well known for his feministic opinions shown through his leading female character’s views, attitudes and beliefs, displaying their unhappiness and discomfort with their stereotypes of being submissive and reliant on their significant others being forced on them to put them in their social ‘place’. Ibsen was also well known for his solid and well displayed use of the Well Made Play structure, following explicitly through the six steps: Exposition, Inciting Incident, Rising Action, Climax, Denouncement and Resolution. One example of not only his use of the Well Made Play structure, but also his comprehension of his modern context, is one of his most famous plays, ‘A Doll House’ written in 1879 (Gwynn, pg 264). After the introduction of the main character/s the inciting incident is quick to follow. It follows the exposition in the form of a confrontation of sorts between Nora, a house wife, and a banker, Krogstad. The scene encompasses the title of “Inciting Incident” as it display a view of Nora being approached directly by Krogstad with accusations of forgery in which he questions if Nora sent a letter for a loan of four-thousand-eight-hundred crowns to her father to guarantee the loan (Gwynn, pgs 221-222, lines 776-829). The moment Nora confesses the Inciting Incident is revealed and left in the open, bare and shocking to the audience. This confession to leave audiences stunned, not only because Nora was hiding the fact that she was in debt to Krogstad from her husband, but because she committed forgery, a criminal act, such an act was unheard of from a woman without her

Open Document