Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

784 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The 3 formulations of the categorical imperative

The Categorical Imperative is an idea that is central to the moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant. The Categorical Imperative is a command or action that describes what we have to do in all situations, irrespective of our desires and preferences; a principle that ‘represents an action as objectively necessary in itself, without reference to another end. Substantiating the Universal Law Formula, it states that I may act only in accordance with that maxim through which I can at the same time will that it become a universal law. A maxim is the principle or rule of an action, and is characterized by three elements; the type of action, the purpose of the action and the circumstances under which one would perform said action for said purpose. The …show more content…

Suppose I formulate a maxim that since my life is going well, I refuse to help anyone else who is in need and keep what I own only for myself. The next step in evaluating the moral obligations of the situation will be to universalize this maxim, such that everyone whose life is going well will refuse to anyone who is in need so as to keep what they have for only themselves. We then need to check if it is possible to conceive of a reality in which this principle is a universal law. Since such a world isn’t an impossible concept (it is possible for everyone whose life is going well to keep what they have for themselves and not help those in need), we will proceed to assess whether or not I would rationally want for the maxim to become universal law. Considering that this would imply that I would not want anyone to help me if I am in a time of need, it is impossible for me to rationally desire, or will, that this maxim to become a universal law. Thus, the problem of contradiction in will renders this maxim or action immoral, leaving me with a moral obligation or duty to not partake in it i.e. not go forth and act such that since my life is going well I refuse to help anyone in need and keep everything I have to

Show More
Related

  • Analyzing Micheaux's Film 'The For Griffith'

    1127 Words  | 3 Pages

    The

    Read More

  • The Crowded Clinic Case Study

    1420 Words  | 3 Pages

    The

    Read More

  • The Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals

    1055 Words  | 3 Pages

    Categorical imperatives are the basis of morality because they provoke pure reasons for every human beings actions. By the end of his work, one will understand Kant’s beliefs on morality, but to explain this, he goes into depth on the difference between hypothetical imperatives and Categorical Imperative, two different formulations of the Categorical Imperative, and a few examples. According to Kant, there are two types on imperatives, categorical imperatives and hypothetical imperatives. The Categorical Imperative is based on relation and not by means, which hypothetical imperatives are based on.

    Read More

  • Categorical Imperative Theory: The Ideas Of Kant's Thought And Theory

    1053 Words  | 3 Pages

    First and foremost, the Greatest Happiness Principle focuses on two main ideas: one’s actions and their resulting utility. An individual is considered moral correct if their actions promote universal utility. However, the principle doesn’t simply require individuals to make any choice that promotes utility. A person is considered “morally correct” when and only when their decision promotes the most pleasure and minimizes the most pain.

    Read More

  • Categorical Imperative: Kant's Expression For The Ethical Law

    1013 Words  | 3 Pages

    Categorical imperative is Kant's expression for the ethical law. It should give an approach to us to assess good actions and to make moral judgments. It is not summon to perform particular activities. It is basically a formal method by which to assess any activity about which may be ethically applicable. Kant along these lines utilized this to infer that ethical obligation is a commitment tying of every ethical operator without a special case. He accordingly highlight the plans for the ethical laws which are the three unique methods for saying what it is, and these include: dependably act in a manner that you could will that the adage of your demonstration turn into a general law, dependably act in a manner that you treat mankind, whether in

    Read More

  • Kant's Prescription without Side Effects

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant proposes a new form of determining the morality of an action. His moral philosophy is grounded upon possessing a single virtue at hand: a good will. Contrary to opposing moral arguments, his views provide absolute parameters with which to prescribe morality through moral requirements, better known as categorical imperatives. In this paper, I will endeavor in Kant’s view of categorical imperatives to better understand how the aforementioned provide a means to determine an action’s morality and how, when confronted by objections, stand firm in their absolute grounds.

    Read More

  • Categorical Imperative Of Immanuel Kant

    1165 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant was a famous German philosopher (1724-1804). His many philosophical writings influenced large population from all over the world. Even today, his works still form a major point of reference in research carried out in the modern world. His writings had a strong base such that they brought a new dimension in religion, law and history. Although all his writings were popular but Metaphysics of Morals was very influencing. Kant argued that our desires and emotions are categorically imperative, which means that they are conscience driven. His philosophy is closely related to the golden rule. It which states that an individual should always act in accordance to the outcome that will give him/her the best outcome, while Kant’s categorical imperative rule argues that actions must be universal for them to be classified as either moral or immoral. Through Kant’s categorical imperative we can distinguish between our

    Read More

  • What Are The Three Branches Of Government Interest Groups

    856 Words  | 2 Pages

    The

    Read More

  • Hypothetical Imperative Kant

    631 Words  | 2 Pages

    An action is moral if it is reasoned. Thus the moral worth of an action is defined by the motive or reason behind it, and not by its consequences. Morality should be universal as the reasons beind any action is same for all people at all times. A moral action is worthy when we can turn the motives behind it into an universally acceptable maxim. In this manner an action is moral if the maxim

    Read More

  • Three Formulations of the Categorical Imperative

    1530 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Kant’s book, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant talks about the three formulations of the categorical imperative. By these formulations, he describes his idea of organizing the moral principle for all rational beings. Kant also talks about the principles of humanity, rational ends, and the “realm of ends” which are constituted by the autonomous freedom of rational beings.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant: The Categorical Imperative

    1417 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant The Categorical Imperative • Thematically, Kant's ethical theory represents the classical formulation of deonotlogical ethics. For deontologists, right action consists solely in the conformity of an action to a justified rule or principle. • For Kant, this becomes equivalent to the rational and autonomous conformity of one's will to maxims that abide by the CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE (aka Moral Law). • In the Foundations for the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), Kant tries to demonstrate how his position provides a philosophical foundation for what is already commonly understood by 'morality' and 'moral action.' Three concepts will be analyzed:

    Read More

  • The Universal Law Formula of the Categorical Imperative

    1053 Words  | 3 Pages

    The universal law formula of the categorical imperative ("the CI") is an unconditional moral law stating that one should “act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.” A maxim is the motivating principle or reason for one’s actions. A moral act is an act by which its maxim can become universal law that would apply to all rational creatures. As a universal law, all rational creatures must act according to this maxim. The CI requires one to imagine a world where the maxim one wishes to act by becomes a universal law, in which all people must act according to this maxim. If one wills this maxim to become universal law that all rational creatures must follow, but there is a contradiction in conception or will, than this maxim cannot become universal law, and thus, the act is not morally permissible. A contradiction in conception occurs when by willing one’s maxim to become universal law, one is imagining a logically impossible world, for there is a contradiction in the very idea of every rational creature acting on this maxim. In contrast, a contradiction in will does not yield a logically impossible world, but there is a contradiction in willing what it is one proposes to do and in wanting the maxim to become universal law.

    Read More

  • Kant and Gay Marriage

    853 Words  | 2 Pages

    All decisions we make are guided by an influenced belief or a maxim. A maxim is an individual rule that we use in our negotiations to steer our conduct. Maxims contain our principles and intentions; they point toward our general character. A solid and well intentioned maxim is universalizable. The precise significance of universalizability is contentious, but the most widespread interpretation is that the categorical imperative asks whether the maxim of your action could become one that everyone could act upon in similar circumstances. An irrational maxim is self-defeating, as it cannot be consistently willed with its intended goal; in other words, it cannot provide a rational guide for human action since it cannot in principle serve as the rule for all persons. Of course’ this in and of itself is highly debated as what can be applied to all people is a far cry from hat should be applied to all people. A rational maxim would be one which made sense for any rational person to obey in similar circumstances. It is our obligation as people worthy of dignity to administer our own actions by rational maxims.

    Read More

  • Kant's Categorical Imperative

    1532 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first formulation of the Categorical Imperative is defined by Kant to "act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law”. Good moral actions are those of which are motivated by maxims which can be consistently willed that it’s generalized form be a universal law of nature. These maxims are otherwise known as universal maxims. Maxims can then be put through the Categorical Imerative test to determine their universalisability and thus the premissability of the maxim. To test a maxim we must ask ourselves whether we can consistently will for a maxim to be obeyed by everyone all the time....

    Read More

  • The Ethical Theory Of Kent Kant's Formula Of Universal Law

    1212 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kent Emanuel considers the Categorical Imperative as the central principle of his ethical theory. He claims that some human actions such as stealing, cheating, and lying are usually immoral and are not right things to do, despite their good outcomes. Based on the Categorical Imperative, he has formulated several principles including the Formula of Universal Law (FUL). The Formula of Universal Law (FUL) is Kant 's first formulation of the Categorical Imperative, which states “Act as if the maxim of your action were to become by your will a universal law of nature” (G, 4:421/31). In The Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Immanuel Kent introduces a philosophical term such as “Maxim” and “Will”. It is very important to understand these terms in order to comprehend the concept of FUL to a greater extent. In general speaking, humans are considered as a rational being among all the organisms. However, while performing their duties, most individual tends to maximize the benefits of their actions rather than observing whether their actions are rational or not. Overall, people usually make their decisions based on the standards that will give them the best outcome. Thus, Kent considered “Maxim” as the principle on the basis of which Human beings make their decisions. For instance, doctors save the

    Read More

More about Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative

Open Document