Icarus Myth

1036 Words3 Pages

Juxtapositions: The Icarus myth IMAGES AND SYMBOLIC MEANING INTRODUCTION This is a literature paper that focuses on Juxtapositions: The Icarus Myth (pages 944 - 949). This section of the text contains four poems in which four different poets use the myth of Icarus as a prompt or archetype for a variety of reasons. This paper explores the Icarus myth found in these poems and using the process of explication constructs a thematic paper. Writers have the niche to create attitude and deep layers of meaning within literary works and create tone and attitude through the use of words and depictions. Moreover, the skilled and artistic authors, poets, and playwrights craft deep layers of meaning for their audience through the purposeful use of symbolism and allegory. The Icarus Myth’s Background King Minos captured Daedalus, Athenian inventor who employed by King Minos to build the maze, or labyrinth, designed to pen in the Minotaur who was half man, half bull. After his work was done, the King refused to let the inventor go back to Athens. It was to free himself from this captivity that Daedalus and his son designed wings to fly out through the air. Flight has long been a symbol for our human capacity to struggle up from the mud and clay, even at the risk of failure. UNIVERSAL APPEAL OF THE ICARUS MYTH The poems show that there is a great universal appeal of the Icarus Myth. The very fact that so many poets, authors and playwrights have used this myth to capture the readers and the audience proves that there is a great appeal this myth has. The universal characters of power such as the sun, gods, human beings able to fly, the message of determination and human thinking abilities are all enough to create interest in the readers. The ...

... middle of paper ...

... in Landscape with the Fail of Icarus 1960 describes a different detail and states that Icarus fell when in spring when a farmer was plowing his field the whole pageantry of the year was awake tingling near the edge of the sea. The main difference is the traditional emphasis on the false features of flying in the air and looking into the eyes of hot son. There are less of the artistic visions of the actual journey and more of the conceptual details. The lessons in the story are more important in the traditional poets. References Anne Sexton (1962) To a Friend Whose Work Has Come to Triumph (1962) Translated by Rolfe Humphries the Roman poet Ovid (43 B.C—AD. 18) Vassar Miller (born 1924) The New Icarus (1956) Flemish painter Pieter Breughel (about 1525—1569) in The Fall of Icarus William Carlos Williams (1885-1963) in Landscape with the Fail of Icarus 1960

Open Document