I Hate Strong Women Character Analysis

In our current age women's rights have made some huge steps. Discrimination against women faces a huge amount of backlash, there are more qualified women in positions of power, and there are more and more women in movies and the like. Nevertheless, there is a long way still to go. One of the big issues is the numerous problems with the way women are shown in publications. Women's portrayal in those things has never been particularly favorable; be it one-dimensional female characters, underrepresentation in media as a whole, and the messages that young kids get due to the last age of sexism are all prevalent issues of the times.
There are many depictions of women that are not accurate to the real world. Women often struggle to be portrayed in a good light, much less any light at all. In lieu of that, the trope of ‘strong female characters’ is prevalent throughout modern media. In and of itself, it has become a negative device. In the article I Hate Strong Female Characters, Sophia McDougall says, “Sherlock Holmes gets to be brilliant, solitary, abrasive, Bohemian, whimsical, brave, sad, manipulative,

The Bechdel itself specifically focuses on women. In order to pass, the film or show must meet the following criteria: It includes at least two women who have at least one conversation about something other than a man or men. While it’s not inherently bad if a movie fails this test, when applied to modern media it is startling how few movies pass it. That is the main problem, looking at the statistics, (graph below) a concerning forty-two percent of movies (out of seven thousand five hundred and eleven tested) did not pass, or only had one or two of the needed elements. The test is not doctrine, but it does do a good job of seeing if there is representation of women who are not simply for men in a movie no matter how badly they are