Hydrate Formula

1371 Words3 Pages

Kesean Williams Brantley Miller Pd. 11 1/11/16 Determination of a Formula for a Hydrate Introduction The focus of the experiment will be a hydrate of copper (Ⅱ) sulfate (CuSO4 ᐧ5H2O) The object of this experiment will be to find the experimental formula for the hydrate of CuSO4 by heating the crystal to dryness. The success of the lab will be determined by how accurate the experimental formula is compared to the actual formula. Theory If heat is applied to Copper (Ⅱ) sulfate pentahydrate, then the experimental form will be equivalent to the theoretical formula. Important key data that will be needed to achieve the goal of the lab experiments includes the initial mass of hydrated crystal, the final mass of anhydrous crystal, the …show more content…

This piece of data was used to find the mass of water driven off. In order to find the mass of water driven off, another value--the final mass of anhydrous crystal, was subtracted from the initial mass of hydrated crystal. This value was found to be .90 grams. The mass of water driven off was determined to be .61 grams. The molar mass of water, which is 18.02 grams, was used together with the mass in grams of water driven off to find the moles of water driven off. The moles of water driven off was calculated to be.034 moles. This value was a crucial half of the experimental formula, and thus crucial to the lab. The final mass of anhydrous crystal was used together with the molar mass of CuSO4 to find the moles of anhydrous crystal. The molar mass of CuSO4 was found by using the periodic table to find the total mass in grams of one copper atom, one sulfur atom, and four oxygen atoms. The moles of anhydrous crystal was determined to be .0056 moles. This was the other crucial half of the experimental formula, thusly crucial to the lab. The experimental mole ratio of H2O CuSO4 was found to be 6.1:1. This information was used to find the experimental formula of the hydrated crystal. The experimental formula was found to be CuSO4 6.1H2O. This formula was compared to the theoretical formula in order to derive the percent error. The percent error was calculated to be 22%. This crucial value was what described how successful the experiment ultimately

Open Document