Hume's Future Patterns Essay

729 Words2 Pages

Hume’s Future Patterns Hume coincides the uniformity of nature by using the matters of fact and relation of ideas to illustrate how one cannot project into the future patterns we have observed in the past. Hume believes that “all truths either express matters of fact or relation of ideas”.These facts and relations of ideas are the self-evident truths that are perceived by humans as common sense; ideas and facts that one would never question or doubt due to previous experiences from it. These ideas are perceived in our minds through the images and impressions that we are exposed to. We, as humans, practice these impressions and ideas so frequently that over time, they become unquestioned thoughts and actions of our everyday lives. Hume begins …show more content…

The term priori basically means that the ideas perceived by humans are only an impression within the minds or pure imagination and that it is not in any way involved with that of nature or the universe. The other term, posteriori, defines all matter of facts which cannot be known as a priori due to the fact that it is not a relation of ideas, but rather “known through the relation of cause and effect”. The other reasoning behind Hume’s statements is the question of whether or not the uniformity of nature expresses a matter of fact. He correlates these matter of facts by the notion of cause and effect. He states that in order for something to be perceived instantly, and even instinctively, is through cause and effect, thus providing humans a way to experiment and adapt to one's surroundings. Although cause and effect allows us to learn from the past and be able to project our experiences from it into the the future, one can never predict what nature will do next. Nature, being unpredictable, may change one day, therefore making the uniformity of nature irrational and unjustified to one’s manifest. I agree with Hume’s belief on not being able to predict the future patterns based on past observations. He is right in saying that nature is not uniform and irrational because one cannot predict what will happen tomorrow or what nature might do next. You can make a very

Show More
Related

  • Exploring Berkeley's Epistemological Argument

    689 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hume was an empiricist and a skeptic who believes in mainly the same ideals as Berkeley does, minus Berkeley’s belief in God, and looks more closely at the relations between experience and cause effect. Hume’s epistemological argument is that casual

    Read More

  • Argument of the Hume's Response to the Missing Shade of Blue

    1260 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume argues that perception can be divided into two types: impressions and ideas. He states that impressions are our first-hand perception, using all of our senses and emotions to experience them (Hume 2012, 8). For example, an impression of a sensation would be experiencing pain and an impression of reflection would be experiencing anger. Hume states that an idea is thinking about an impression. You cannot use your senses to experience the sensation or emotion, you are just simply reflecting on your experience (Hume 2007, 13). For example, thinking about the pain you felt when you stubbed your toe or thinking about how angry you felt when your football team lost. Hume argues that our thought is limited. He argues that when we imagine things such as an orange sea, we are simply joining two consistent ideas together. Hume argues that ‘all our ideas or more feeble perceptions are copies of our impressions or more lively ones’ (Hume 2007, 13). This is called the Copy Principle.

    Read More

  • David Hume: Compatibilism And Hume

    1937 Words  | 4 Pages

    In this section, Hume begins by categorizing knowledge into types: relations of ideas and matters of fact. Relations of ideas are knowable a priori and negating such a statement would lead to a contradiction, and matters of fact are knowable a posteriori, or through experience, and the negation would not be a contradiction. While relations of ideas are generally used in mathematics, matters of fact are significant in determining how one experiences the world; the beliefs an individual has are formed through his experience, thus making cognition a matter of fact.... ... middle of paper ...

    Read More

  • David Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion

    1522 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion we are introduced to three characters that serve the purpose to debate God and his nature, more specifically, what can mankind infer about God and his nature. The three characters; Demea, Philo, and Cleanthes all engage in a debate concerning this question and they all serve the purpose of supporting their views on the subject. It is the “argument from design” put forth by Cleanthes that is the focal point of the discussion, and it is Demea and Philo who attempt to discredit it.

    Read More

  • David Hume and Future Occurrences

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    In An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume demonstrates how there is no way to rationally make any claims about future occurrences. According to Hume knowledge of matters of fact come from previous experience. From building on this rationale, Hume goes on to prove how, as humans we can only make inferences on what will happen in the future, based on our experiences of the past. But he points out that we are incorrect to believe that we are justified in using our experience of the past as a means of evidence of what will happen in the future. Since we have only experience of the past, we can only offer propositions of the future. Hume classifies human into two categories; “Relations of Ideas,” and “Matters of Fact.” (240) “Relations of ideas” are either intuitively or demonstratively certain, such as in Mathematics (240). It can be affirmed that 2 + 2 equals 4, according to Hume’s “relations of ideas.” “Matters of fact” on the other hand are not ascertained in the same manner as “Relations of Ideas.” The ideas that are directly caused by impressions are called "matters of fact". With “matters of fact,” there is no certainty in establishing evidence of truth since every contradiction is possible. Hume uses the example of the sun rising in the future to demonstrate how as humans, we are unjustified in making predictions of the future based on past occurrences. As humans, we tend to use the principle of induction to predict what will occur in the future. Out of habit, we assume that sun will rise every day, like it has done in the past, but we have no basis of actual truth to make this justification. By claiming that the sun will rise tomorrow according to Hume is not false, nor is it true. Hume illustrates that “the contrary of every matter of fact is still possible, because it can never imply a contradiction and is conceived by the mind with the same facility and distinctness as if ever so conformable to reality” (240). Just because the sun has risen in the past does not serve as evidence for the future. Thus, according to Hume, we are only accurate in saying that there is a fifty- percent chance that the sun will rise tomorrow. Hume felt that all reasoning concerning matter of fact seemed to be founded on the relation between cause and effect.

    Read More

  • Hume's Ideas on Cause and Effect

    684 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cause and effect is a tool used to link happenings together and create some sort of explanation. Hume lists the “three principles of connexion among ideas” to show the different ways ideas can be associated with one another (14). The principles are resemblance, contiguity, and cause and effect. The focus of much of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding falls upon the third listed principle. In Section I, Hume emphasizes the need to uncover the truths about the human mind, even though the process may be strenuous and fatiguing. While the principle of cause and effect is something utilized so often, Hume claims that what we conclude through this process cannot be attributed to reason or understanding and instead must be attributed to custom of habit.

    Read More

  • David Hume's Argument on Passion and Morality

    1149 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before Hume can begin to explain what morality is, he lays down a foundation of logic to build on by clarifying what he thinks the mind is. Hume states that the facts the mind sees are just the perceptions we have of things around us, such as color, sound, and heat (Hume, 215). These perceptions can be divided into the two categories of ideas and impressions (215). Both of these categories rely on reason to identify and explain what is observed and inferred. However, neither one of these sufficiently explains morality, for to Hume, morals “. . .excite passions, and produce or prevent actions” (216)....

    Read More

  • The Egocentric Predicament

    482 Words  | 1 Pages

    In science, Hume recognized a problem with scientific causality. He saw science as being based on inductive reasoning, which results in generalized rules or principles.

    Read More

  • David Hume And Spinoza

    1816 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hume contends that all human behavior is predictable given certain circumstances. Every nation, in any period of time, will have citizens that will act in a similar fashion to other nations, in any other period of time (53). Hume supports this idea by asserting that this is why the philosophy of human nature is possible. Spinoza has similar ideas about behavior but is more thorough in his analysis. Spinoza begins his critique from a naturalistic approach. He believes that the universal laws of nature give us an understanding of affects. Affects such as hate, anger, love, lust, happiness, and joy are all determined by nature. It is nature that affects the individual, not the individual affecting nature. Thus, nature affects everyone in a similar fashion and gives rise to similar ideas and feelings. From a naturalist perspective, the laws of nature can help understand the laws that govern

    Read More

  • Aquinas’ Cosmological Arguments

    1633 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hume stated

    Read More

  • David Hume's Problem Of Induction

    1216 Words  | 3 Pages

    I agree with Hume’s claim that cause and effect cannot be determined by reason, but I also think that the principle of the unity of nature is an acceptable school of thought to rely on. Miracles are defined as violation of the laws of nature. The laws of nature, in which I am including the principle of the unity of nature based on the operational value, dictate against the existence of miracles using any uniform experiences imaginable. Now that isn’t to say that anything that I personally have not witnessed is a miracle. In Hume’s Indian prince example, the occurrence of frost seemed like a miracle because it was contrary to his constant and uniform experience.

    Read More

  • David Hume's Of the Standard of Taste

    1347 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this essay Hume creates the true judges who are required to have: delicacy of taste, practice in a specific art of taste, be free from prejudice in their determinations, and good sense to guide their judgments. In Hume’s view the judges allow for reasonable critiques of objects. Hume also pointed out that taste is not merely an opinion but has some physical quality which can be proved. So taste is not a sentiment but a determination. What was inconsistent in the triad of commonly held belief was that all taste is equal and so Hume replaced the faulty assumption with the true judges who can guide society’s sentiments.

    Read More

  • Kant Answer Hume On Causality

    1060 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume states that in nature we observe correlated events that are both regular and irregular. For instance, we assume that the sun will rise tomorrow because it has continued to do so time and time again and we assume that thunder will be accompanied by lightning for the same reason. We never observe the causation between a new day and the sun rising or between thunder and lightning, however. We are simply observing two events that correlate in a regular manner. Hume’s skepticism therefore comes from the belief that since we do not observe causal links, we can never truly be sure about what causes anything else. He then goes so far as to say that if this is the case, it must be a fact that nothing causes anything else. In Hume’s theory, there is not only no objective causation, but no objective principle of cause and effect on the whole.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Descartes And Hume

    1247 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hume uses senses, like Descartes, to find the truth in life. By using the senses he states that all contents of the mind come from experience. This leads to the mind having an unbound potential since all the contents are lead by experiences. The mind is made up two parts impressions and ideas. Impressions are the immediate data of the experience. For example, when someone drops a book on the desk and you hear a loud sound. The sight of the book dropping and hitting the desk is registered by an individual’s senses- sight, sound, feeling. Hume believes there are two types of impressions, original and secondary impressions. Original impressions are based on the senses,

    Read More

  • David Hume's Theory of Knowledge

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    David Hume, following this line of thinking, begins by distinguishing the contents of human experience (which is ultimately reducible to perceptions) into: a) impressions and b) ideas.

    Read More

More about Hume's Future Patterns Essay

Open Document