Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The stereotype towards immigrants
The disadvantage of culture conflict
The stereotype towards immigrants
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Though the ability to interact with a diverse community is becoming more and more seamless on a daily basis, our contact with other cultures does not come without barriers. We are able to have contact with people from all aspects of life and also with people from all over the world, however the ability to have contact does not automatically afford us the ability to understand or relate with one another. While we do have curiosity about people outside of our spectrum our curiosity is also tempered with a certain level of fear. The idea of the citizens of earth coming together in any sort of united front is one that is very daunting to many people for reasons so numerous it would be difficult to attempt to list them all. Human beings seem to be rooted in the mentality of competition; we have the desire as individuals and as groups to be on top, in order for someone to be on top someone else has to be on the bottom. The human tendency toward competition in some ways benefits us while in other ways it is our curse. Our increasing level of contact with other people and cultures is made possible by the mobility of our society as well as through many forms of media; the media has the power to influence cultural diversity in both positive and negative ways. The issue of human competition is not a new one, since the dawn of time there have been instances of human contention and conflict. Franklin Foer talked about cultural division in America in his book How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization (2004); in this book Foer attempts to use soccer to illustrate the division between classes and political groups in America. An excerpt of his book reads: “It [soccer] tapped into the conventional wisdom among yuppie pa... ... middle of paper ... ... on the bottom, it is also true that the top cannot be strong unless the bottom is also strong otherwise the whole structure will collapse. As humans we have to decide what we want to become of our civilization, do we want to be on the top of a crushed pile? Or do we want to be a part of a structurally sound and autonomous civilization. Works Cited Appiah, Kwame A. "Moral Disagreement." Green, Stuart and April Lidinsky. From Inquiry to Academic Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2012. 656-666. Print. Foer, Franklin. "From How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization." Green, Stuart and April Lidinsky. From Inquiry to Academic Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2012. 636-648. Print. Zayani, Mohamed. "Media, Cultural Diversity and Globalization: Challenges and Oppertunities." Journal of Cultural Diversity 18.2 (2011): 48-54. Print.
In the article “Moral Disagreement”, Kwame Anthony Appiah discusses the issue of morality. He uses his cultural background to bring examples of what is the morality of right and wrong. Appiah’s argument is that right and wrong will vary from culture to culture. Even if someone understands a culture completely, they will always have something that they will disagree about. Morality is constantly evolving and changing, and there will always be someone who will argue against a moral concept being right. The following is a rhetorical analysis of Appiah’s credibility, tone, and audience.
Gaut, Berys. "Rag-bags, Disputes and Moral Pluralism." Utilitas 11 (1): 37-48. Obtained from PHIL 250 B1, Winter Term 2014 Further Readings – Ethics. University of Alberta eClass.
Like many other individuals, Franklin Foer titles himself to be a soccer expert and enthusiast. Moreover, he is also acclaimed for his work in the field of globalization. In his book, he uses the game of soccer as his universal device. In How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization, Foer recorded his travels throughout the globe to explore all the different cultures, beliefs and agendas that make a habit of using the beautiful game of soccer.
Franklin Foer the author of How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization is an important contributor of the small topic of the how soccer is related to the world. Foer from the New Republic who writes from time to time in the well known newspaper of the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal had traveled around the world especially the continent of Europe, Asia, North and South America. Going from the topic of why the Islam religion, Islamic law, and religious paramilitary militia prohibits the passionate, die-hard Islamic women fans; from attending and/or watching soccer games and then partying hard like the men after the game if their country or favorite club wins. To the topic of how America relates to soccer when the middle class accepted this sport because of the little violence that they thought the sport contained and to how some Americans support writers such as Tom Weir from USA Today’s “that hating soccer is more American than apple pie, driving a pickup, or spending Saturday afternoons channel surfing with the remote control” (Foer 240). The majority of Americans that support this quote are the lower class, liberals, majority of sports reporters, and narrow minded Americans. These topics and/or chapters really show how soccer is creating more globalization around the world especially with Islamic women getting rid of their traditions and trying new things such as showing their passion for soccer. In addition, America is trying to pass its apple pie and watching American Football on a Sunday to watching beautiful game of soccer. How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization is really divided into three groups; the first being the rivalries between clubs and human beings, sec...
Admittedly, the nation by which you just visualized is indeed the United States of America about a half a century ago. As you visualize our great and beautiful country presently, you will perceive that times have changed dramatically. To take a case in point, educational institutions now encourage inclusion rather than segregation, interracial relationships are at an all-time high, sports are extremely diverse, North America has the leading net migration rate universally, and our President, Chief of the State, Chief Executive, Chief Diplomat, Commander in Chief, Chief Legislator, Chief of the Party, and Guardian of our economic system is in fact, an African-American man. Although it is true that, the successful diversity of our society can be attributed to the progressive interconnectedness of the many racial-ethnic groups within it, I concede that sports played an immense contribution in the evolving diversity of our society.
Accusing American society of being too competitive is a broad allegation, though competition is no doubt an essential part of our daily lives. It is evident in the law-making authorities of our country, in addition to state and local leaders. It is apparent in everyday business, whether in the stock market or in simple business advertisements. Sporting events contain enormous amounts of competition, but this friendly competition sometimes gets out of hand. Our society would be nothing without certain forms of competition, though sometimes competition turns into rivalry.
Sadri, Houman and Madelyn Flammia, “Mass Communication,” Intercultural Communication: A New Approach to International Relations and Global Challenges (New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011).
Franklin Foer wrote “From How Soccer Explains the World: An Unlikely Theory of Globalization” which was published in 2004. The book talks about different aspects of globalization and “culture wars”. Franklin is an American journalist who used to work as an editor of The New Republic. He belongs to a family of writers as one of his younger brothers is a novelist and the other is a freelance journalist. In his book Franklin elucidated the impact of globalization on the society. He has used soccer to elaborate the main ideas in the text and because of this link between globalization and soccer, the book has fascinated several sportspersons. Furthermore, this chapter is branching out into three parts and each part scrutinizes a different aspect
Kaplan, Daniel. "The Soccer Theory of Globalization." Aidwatchers.com. Aid Watchers, 15 July 2009. Web. 04 Dec. 2013.
Beauchamp, T. L.(2003). A Defense of the Common Morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13(3), 259-274.
Though soccer may have been the earliest organized sport in the British colonies and early United States, it soon had to compete with baseball, football, and basketball. The first baseball game was on June 9th, 1846. People liked it because younger people could play. It was very popular among immigrants from England, Germany, and Ireland. In 1857 the National Association of Baseball Players was started. Then December 5th, 1856 a newspaper called baseball the “national pastime.” Then by the late 1800s American football, which combined rugby and Boston soccer, became increasingly popular. Three presidents played or coached football: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Dwight D. Eisenhower. Basketball was not invented until t...
Arthur, John, and Scalet, Steven, eds. Morality and Moral Controversies: Readings in Moral, Social, and Political Philosophy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Eighth Edition, 2009.
Research guided by conflict theory generally falls into the following categories: 1) studies of how athletes become alienated from their own bodies; 2) studies of how sports can be used to coerce and control people; 3) studies of sports and the development of commercialism in society; 4) studies of sports and various forms of nationalism and militarism; and 5) studies of sports and racism and sexism. (Coakley, 1998) In the book, Meggyesy provided examples of each of these categories which occurred during his footba...
Owens, Thomas and Helmer, Diana Star. The History of Soccer. New York: The New York Times. Rosen Publishing Group, Power Kids Press, 2000.
Football, undoubtedly being the world’s game, has a long history of politicization. Since the dawn of the organized game, world leaders and governments have found ways to manipulate the game for their own benefit, whether it be promoting a national identity or suppressing marginalized minorities. The games immense popularity has made it an easy avenue for politicization, both by governments and by resistance groups. It has served as a means of communication, propaganda, and organization. Matthias Marschik argues “football really was non-political because the attempts at both resistance and manipulation balanced each other out.” While governments and citizens have both politicized the game, the extent is far from equal in terms of the