How Is 1984 Possible For The Future

933 Words2 Pages

1984: A Disturbing Possibility For The Future George Orwell's dystopian novel, 1984, is a startling possibility for the future. 1984 is considered to be a political and science fiction as well as a dystopian novel. It has an original copyright date of 1949 by Harcourt Inc. George's real name was Eric Blair and he lived from 1903-1950. He was born in Bengal. He wrote many political pieces including Animal Farm. He was a literary critic but hated intellectual people. Orwell's novels were used to prove that people were unable to deal with history. 1984 is one of his most memorable novels to this day. 1984's exposition starts off following the main character, an older man named Winston Smith, during a time period where Big Brother is watching everything. Big Brother is the new form government that is set up after the revolution. Winston works in Records Department for the Ministry where he destroys whatever documents are placed upon his desk and then rewrites history to portray Big Brother in a better light or eliminate the name of someone who has been vaporized. The only problem is his hate for the Ministry and for Big Brother. He cannot let his distaste for them show on his face in fear that the Thought Police or the telescreen see it and have him vaporized. The rising action and exposition seem to overlap. The rising action starts with Winston writing in a journal that he found. This is not typical behavior of a party member so he writes in it around the corner of the telescreen. Items of the past are not allowed and most have been destroyed. He found his journal in an antique shop in the prole district. The proles are the extremely poor who are not as strictly policed as the party members and inner party members. While walking ... ... middle of paper ... ... secret room with Julia. I liked that they fought and snuck around to have time together because they enjoyed it. I recommend this book to anyone who enjoys dystopian novels or science fiction. 1984 and The Handmaid's Tale have very similar qualities. They are both dystopian novels warning of what the world could become. There is a new form of government in both novels that some people are unhappy with. They differ in the views on sexually related things. In 1984, sex is supposed to only be procreate. It has been desexualized and made dirty. This is to remove the potential connection it could create. The children are then used to spy on parents. In The Handmaid's Tale sex is used to procreate but children are valued. They are few and far between so birth and children are celebrated. Both novels were wonderful reads but portray similar issues in different lights.

Open Document