How Hamlet's Mental State Changes in the Soliloquies in Hamlet by Shakespeare

759 Words2 Pages

How Hamlet's Mental State Changes in the Soliloquies in Hamlet by Shakespeare In William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” there are four major soliloquies that reflect the character of Hamlet. In this paper I will be analyzing and discussing how these four soliloquies reflect changes in Hamlet’s mental state; his changing attitudes toward life and the other characters in the play, particularly the women; and his reflection on the task of revenge that has been assigned to him. These four soliloquies are the backbones of the play, and they offer the audience a glimpse into Hamlet’s mind and thought processes. In the first soliloquy it is very obvious that Hamlet’s sanity is in question. This is apparent in the first four lines of this soliloquy. “ O that this too solid flesh would melt, Thaw and resolve itself into a dew, Or that the Everlasting had not fixed, His canon ‘gainst self-slaughter, O God! God!” (42) These few lines show that Hamlet is so depressed that he wishes he could melt away into nothingness or commit suicide. It is also very apparent in this soliloquy, that Hamlet is beginning to loath his mother for marrying Claudius only one month after King Hamlet’s death. Hamlet loathes his mother and begins to loath all women, because he believes they are all weak. “Let me not think on’t! Frailty, They name is women!” (42) Hamlet seems to view Denmark as a metaphorical garden of Eden which now totally corrupt, this can be seen when Hamlet says “ Tis an unweeded garden, That grows to seed; things rank and gross in nature”. (42) This soliloquy presents the audience a glimpse into Hamlet’s psyche, he is obviously enraged at his mother’s marriage, the state of Denmark, and he is... ... middle of paper ... ...of view. First, he was a great man of noble birth and he had a lot of responsibility in his kingdom. He is looked up to by most for leadership and guidance. Hamlet has the fatal tendency to only concentrate on only one thing, this thing was to revenge his father’s death by killing Claudius. This tendency leads him to his downfall along with his on major character flaw. This flaw is that Hamlet is a serial procrastinator. One example of this procrastination is that he had many chance to murder Claudius but he did not, he always seemed to find some excuse not to do it. I wonder if he killed Claudius the first chance he got, would he have lived a long and happy life as the King along with his Queen, instead of dying by the shear will of Claudius. Bibliography: Works Cited Shakespeare, William. “Hamlet” Shakespeare made easy. 1986

Open Document