How Does Neil Cargile Define Abnormality?

1531 Words4 Pages

Reflection Paper 1 After reading the case of Neil Cargile and Martin B., I believe that Martin B. most closely fits the definition of abnormality. The reason I believe this is that his behavior fits the pattern suggested by Rosenhan and Seligman more clearly than Neil Cargile. Characteristics of Abnormality According to MacLeod (2014), the seven characteristics that define abnormality, based on the research done by Rosenhan and Seligman, are the following: suffering, maladaptiveness, unconventionality, unpredictability, irrationality and incomprehensibility, observer discomfort, and the violation of moral or social standards. Suffering. When Martin’s wife leaves him after twelve years of marriage, he is understandably devastated. Her departure …show more content…

Expanding on what I was saying about Martin’s newfound dependence on alcohol to get to sleep, the maladaptive nature of his disorder can be seen in that dependence. When a behavior is maladaptive, it interferes with a person’s ability to work normally, interact with other people normally, and it also causes problems with a person’s day-to-day functionality when they are by themselves. At a certain point before Martin sought help – at the insistence of his older brother – he wasn’t able to concentrate, eat, or even attend work (Bernheim 2004, p. 7). Out of those three activities, the inability to eat was the most maladaptive behavior that Martin displayed, as failure to eat can lead to death by starvation in extreme cases. While the other two behaviors were still detrimental to his ability to take care of himself, the failure to eat anything was, to me, a telling sign that there was something seriously wrong with Martin’s …show more content…

Unlike with the criterion of unconventionality, it is easy to see the unpredictable nature of Martin’s behavior. According to Bernheim (2004), “Martin was a thirty-nine-year-old engineer when his wife left. He made a good living, through working long hours to do so…He had been proud that he was able to support his family without his wife’s financial help” (p.7). When his wife life, it isn’t surprising that he felt adrift since so much of his pride was invested in being able to support his family. The unpredictable part was the extreme way that tragic event affected him. In what I have seen, people who undergo extreme crises tend to cling hard to the one sure thing that they have left in their lives. In Martin’s case, I would have expected him to become even more dedicated to his job in order to try and soften the blow of his wife’s

More about How Does Neil Cargile Define Abnormality?

Open Document