How Does George Orwell Use Power In Animal Farm

549 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animal farm compared to russian revolution

Imagine a life where a person had no say in things, where life was in full throttle. In the book Animal Farm written by George Orwell, he saw how the Russian revolution was a dark and impactful period of our time. Orwell made power stand out in his book, he saw how power was misused during the Russian revolution. George Orwell took his knowledge of the Russian Revolution and broke it down with farm animals to get the point across easier, he gave us a look at what life was probably like back in the time. The book Animal Farm, power played a vast part in this story. The leader that showed this was Napoleon. He was a harsh and cruel leader, who didn't care about others. Napoleon played a big role in this story. He was the definition of a dictator, after running out snowball he became leader. He was a strict and cruel leader who didn’t care about his reasonability and his animals. "They were always cold, and usually hungry as well."(62-63) He just wanted things to be done, like the windmill no matter what happened he wanted it to be built. No matter how cold or hungry the animals were he wanted it built. …show more content…

"All that year the animals worked like slaves”.(51) They worked throughout the whole Winter trying to make Napoleon happy. Jobs were not always fair, some animals including the pigs never touched a shovel. Boxer being the hardest worker picked up the slack from other animals. Naplon liked feeling power and control and sometimes worries about snowball coming back, so he continued to make up lies about him. Life was hard for the animals but they just kept going. If the animals tried to rebel or deny Napoleon he would often take away their food or even kill them. Animals started to think about their hope of surviving and their hope about snowball ever coming

Show More
Related

  • The Warnings in George Orwell's Animal Farm

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    Snowball the mirror image of Leon Trotsky, in all except appearance is the most promising leader of Animal Farm. Like Trotsky, Snowball is a kind ruler who is best interested in the prosperity and happiness of his ?comrades?. Snowball brought literacy and equality to Animal Farm through his teachings, and the writing of the Seven Commandments. Another way in which Snowball is similar to Trotsky is his role in the Battle of the Cowshed, where he organized the farms defenses and was the key to victory. Much like when Leon Trotsky organized the Red Army. Both Snowball and Trotsky were excellent public speakers and could win a crowds favor easily. ?Snowball was a more vivacious pig than Napoleon, quicker in speech and more inventive, but was not considered to have the same ...

    Read More

  • Exploring Character Dynamics in Animal Farm

    866 Words  | 2 Pages

    He convinced the animals that Napoleon had their best interests at heart and that he would be like a father and make all the best decisions

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    1401 Words  | 3 Pages

    ”(Page 33, chapter5) Thus, this proves that Napoleon is an obnoxious pig because just because he was against Snowball’s windmill idea he urinated all over his work so he could get his way. Comprehension 3. If there had been one more chapter in Animal Farm, I think it would go as follows: Weeks pass by and the animals still could not get over the fact of what they had witnessed looking through the window. They felt betrayed and exhausted and had lost hope for Animal Farm.

    Read More

  • Animal Farm

    1206 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...d have his rations reduced by half” (Page 40). Here, Napoleon’s forces the animals to work and controls them while hiding behind the façade of the fact that the work is voluntary. Thus, Napoleon does not set himself as a target for the animals and, hence the animals do not aim for him or try to revolt. Overall, Napoleon’s use of coercive power allows him to exercise control over the society of Animal Farm.

    Read More

  • Animal Farm Compared To The Russian Revolution

    2319 Words  | 5 Pages

    Just as during the revolution, when at first Stalin was fair and just but as he was given power he turns into a corrupt man with dictatorship qualities. He became more selfish and sinister. When securing his power base he engineered the permanent exile of Trotsky. This compares to the book, when Napoleon and his ‘nine sturdy puppies’ chased Snowball out of the farm. Napoleon then proceeds to portray his true nature of an assassin.

    Read More

  • How Did Napoleon Get Into Power In Animal Farm

    1157 Words  | 3 Pages

    Dictators cannot obtain power just off of force, but a with combination of tactics and support. George Orwell, the author of Animal Farm depicts the events that happened during the Russian Revolution under a dictator, using a comparison of Napoleon, a fictional character who takes full authority of a farm. One of many real life dictators include, Ne Win who gradually takes over in power. Napoleon, a dictator in Animal Farm shares multiple similarities with Ne Win, a dictator from Burma. Both Napoleon and Ne Win slyly bring their way into power, oppress individual rights of their citizens, and mercilessly slaughter their people.

    Read More

  • Power And Corruption In George Orwell's Animal Farm

    832 Words  | 2 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln once said, “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” ("Abraham Lincoln Quote"). Lord Acton also said, “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” (“Lord Acton Quotes”). Both of the quotes show that power is not always a good thing, and can sometimes make good people, do bad things. Animal Farm by George Orwell is a novella about animals rebelling against humans on a farm in England. The novella has been said to be directly related to the Russian Revolution of the early 20th century. Immediately after the animals gained power, the pigs took over as the leaders of the animals. The pigs became corrupt with the power, and may have made conditions worse than they were with humans

    Read More

  • How Does Napoleon Gain Power In Animal Farm

    1012 Words  | 3 Pages

    Napoleon would use fear to stop any arguments or dissent. Napoleon introduces his dogs by having them attack Snowball, and then, “He was running as only a pig can run, but the dogs were close on his heels. Suddenly he slipped and it seemed certain that they had him (Orwell, pg 35). Napoleons dogs would get rid of Snowball even when the words in propaganda could not effectively do so. Since this is the first incident the other animals do not know how to react to this situation. Snowball was only capable of running. The use of dogs created fear in all of the animals and made it very easy for Napoleon to ascend to the position of the leader of Animal Farm. Napoleon appeared to change countenance, and sharply ordered Boxer to let the dog go, whereat Boxer lifted his hoof, and the dog slunk away, bruised and howling” () Despite the dogs effectively use fear against the animals it didn’t always work as planned. This is why Napoleon had to get rid of Boxer. Napoleon uses the dogs’ violence to threaten the other animals as well as Boxers fate. Napoleon was a master of using fear to his advantage, and through this fear the other animals followed

    Read More

  • Examples Of Napoleon In Animal Farm

    975 Words  | 2 Pages

    Napoleon Starts out as a moral and honest member in the Animal society by trying to benefit society as a whole. “These three (Napoleon, Snowball, and Squealer) had elaborated old Major’s teachings into a complete system of thought, to which they gave the name of Animalism. Several

    Read More

  • Animal Farm: An Allegory of Russian History

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the main characters of Animal Farm is an allegorical parallel of Joseph Stalin. Napoleon is the pig that emerges as the leader of Animal Farm after the Rebellion. He represents the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin in Animal Farm, but can easily stand for any of the great dictators in world history. Napoleon seems at first to be a good leader, but he is eventually overcome by greed and becomes power-hungry. Stalin was the same in Russia, leaving the original equality of socialism behind, giving himself all the power and living in luxury while the peasants suffered. While Stalin’s national and international status flourished, the welfare of Russia remained unchanged. In Animal Farm, Orwell writes a similar thing: “Somehow it seemed as though the farm had grown richer without making the animals themselves richer – except of course the pigs and the dogs.” In the novel, Napoleon openly seizes power for himself by using the dogs he trained to chase Snowball off Animal Farm. He banishes Snowball with no justification and rewrites history in order to further his own ends. Similarly, Stalin forced Trotsky from Russia and seized control of Russia. Stalin used his secret police ...

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    584 Words  | 2 Pages

    Snowball and Napoleon held a great deal of contrast between the way they each ruled over “Animal Farm/Manor Farm.” The only thing he did lack, was the ability of pursuasion to the other animals. Snowball had all the right ideas, all to better the whole farm. Napoleon, on the other hand, had a knack for stealing other animals’ ideas, then telling the rest it was his and getting credit for it. His ideas only seemed to benefit the pigs and not the animals. It was this, that led to the crumbling of the farm. Napoleons obsession with becoming the ruler is what got Snowball nearly killed by the dogs...in a plot made by Napoleon. Which then produced a whole new rebellion not of the animals to the humans, but of the animals to the pigs. So for these reasons, Snowball showed better qualities for leadership than Napoleon because he wasn’t selfish and thought about the future of “Animal Farm.” First, the dominated farm animals viewed Napoleon and Snowball differently at different times throughout the book. The way the animals reacted to each leader brought upon new problems of the farm. The animals respected Snowball, and believed that his teachings were all true and had a good cause. Although Snowball and Napoleon had superior qualities leadership, it was clearly Snowball who had the better qualities for running a farm. Under Snowballs’ rule, the animals were generally content with what was going on and were all for it if it was to better the farm. It was obvious that Napoleon had the better half of getting his own way on the farm. However, the animals had some problems with Napoleon but they didn’t know haw to express their feelings and show him that they didn’t like the way he ran things. It was the animals’ ignorance that helped keep Napoleon in rule for as long as it was. The responses were so different between the animals that it must have been a drastic change between Snowball and Napoleon.

    Read More

  • The Relationship between Snowball and Napoleon in Animal Farm

    424 Words  | 1 Pages

    Napoleon was a leader who led with an iron fist. A fist he used to secretly abuse his fellow animal. He began by raising several ferocious dogs to aid him in enforcing his rules, laws, and expectations. Using them, he abruptly ended Snowballs reign by using the dogs to exile him from the farm. Shortly after, he halted the construction of the windmill. More often than not he would cleverly work his way around the seven commandments by altering them to his pleasure. For example, 'Now animal shall drink alcohol to excess.'; Or 'No animal shall sleep in a bed with sheets.'; Napoleon grounded the rations of each and every animal. The farm slowly fell into a dark abyss with every wretched move Napoleon made.

    Read More

  • Exploration Of The Main Themes In "Animal Farm"

    595 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal Farm, a novella by George Orwell, tells the tale of the downtrodden animals of Manor Farm, who after much oppression from their master, take over the farm for themselves. In the beginning it seems like the start of a life of freedom and plenty, but a ruthless and cunning elite emerges and begins to take control of the farm. The animals find themselves ensnared once again as one form of tyranny gradually replaces the other. The novella is a critique of revolutionary Russia and idealism betrayed by power and corruption. Orwell uses allegory between Animal Farm and the Soviet Union to highlight the corruption of socialist ideals in the Soviet Union, the power of language and propaganda, and the dangers of a naive working class.

    Read More

  • George Orwell's Animal Farm

    691 Words  | 2 Pages

    George Orwell’s Animal Farm is a political satire of a totalitarian society ruled by a mighty dictatorship, in all probability a fable for the events surrounding the Russian Revolution of 1917. The animals of “Manor Farm” overthrow their human master after a long history of mistreatment. Led by the pigs, the farm animals continue to do their work, only with more pride, knowing that they are working for themselves, as opposed to working for humans. Little by little, the pigs become dominant, gaining more power and advantage over the other animals, so much so that they become as corrupt and power-hungry as their predecessors, the humans.

    Read More

  • Animal Farm by George Orwell: An Allegorical Satire

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal Farm’ is a novel by George Orwell which carries allegorical aspects. In other words, this novel is mainly focused on the Russian Revolution of 1917. Orwell has portrayed this revolution and the era of Stalin in the Soviet Union (USSR), in a satirical manner. Through out the novel, he has brought out a strong criticism about the power- hungry human kind and the way it affects a nation.

    Read More

More about How Does George Orwell Use Power In Animal Farm

Open Document