How Does Garofalo Present Heathcliff As An Anti Hero

1289 Words3 Pages

In Wuthering Heights, readers are constantly exposed to contrasting things that are almost paradoxical throughout the novel that manifests in the characters and places. One of the major recurring themes is the strong contrast between everything such as the names of the places, namely the heights, the acts of love and revenge, and the forces of good and evil. Garofalo begins her article with an argument that Heathcliff’s form of love was not “inassimilable” but on the contrary, it is a necessary for the consumption culture of capitalism. Garofalo further argues that instead, it was Catherine’s love that acts “in opposition to capitalist accumulation”. While I agree with Garofalo’s argument of Heathcliff’s love, I disagree with her claim of Catherine’s love. In fact, I …show more content…

It then will consider and substantiate that Catherine’s love functions not as an opposing force but an equivalent to Heathcliff’s. Throughout the novel, the readers were introduced to Heathcliff as a non-stereotypical hero, one that can love passionately as much as he hates. This paradoxical quality humanizes Heathcliff; portraying him as a tragic anti- hero of a melodramatic 19th century literature. As Garofalo states, “Heathcliff’s productivity is the result of his lost love, but this loss generates a particularly Victorian kind of consumption stimulated by romance and by death”. That is why as an emotionally turbulent character, Heathcliff left the Heights heartbroken and despondent, only to return with fortune and revenge. Heathcliff’s intent for revenge shows his more emotional side, the other side of the coin. Catherine’s statement “Tell her what Heathcliff is: an unreclaimed creature, without refinement, without cultivation; an arid wilderness of furze and whinstone.” serves as a warning of the true character of Heathcliff, one that only

Open Document