How Does Ethan Watters Use Cultural Imperialism

1567 Words4 Pages

In Ethan Watters’ essay “Mega-Marketing of Depression,” Watters describes the process GlaxoSmithKline, a drug company, uses to change the way Japan views mental health, especially depression. The tactics GlaxoSmithKline uses in the essay show how they use cultural imperialism to influence scientific ideas in Japan. Cultural imperialism plays a significant role in the exchange of scientific ideas between cultures. It is a driving force in the evolution of changing technologies and medicines. It promotes the growth of technologies, but it should not force one nation's ideals onto another. A country should pursue their own technological and medicinal advances at their pace. Nations may be influenced by another nation’s progress to seek their own …show more content…

The company assures the researchers it brings in, like Applebaum, that they want to "fight" depression, anxiety, and social phobia (527). It is almost their calling to bring light to these diseases, and they will use any means necessary. Applbaum says on this topic, "They seemed to believe their products were effective and they were baffled that anyone should question their value" (528). The way Applbaum describes this meeting with GlaxoSmithKline reveals some of their real intentions, making money. Applbaum says the company was "baffled" anyone would question their integrity. This is quite an exaggerated emotion. It seems like they were trying to hard to display good intentions and when were actually questioned, they were offended this exaggerated degree. They wanted to believe they were doing good and hid their real motives. They used "fighting depression" as a means to make money. If they were really in the market for the benefit of the Japanese people, they could have had a cleaner campaign. The only reason GlaxoSmithKline can say they are in the market for the sake of the Japanese people, is because their product has shown results. Pxil and other serotonin leveling drugs have worked in some cases, but Paxil is not the magic pill that can cure depression, GlaxoSmithKline is making only it seem like …show more content…

Paxil does not promote the Japanese scientific community to grow and expand on their own. Instead, the Japanese culture is diminished and changed for monetary gain. GlaxoSmithKline does not allow the Japanese market to grow on it's own and instead almost forces the Japanese market to accept their, and western, ideals. With the covering up of scientific results, bolstering of wrong data, and underhanded actions in marketing via the internet and bringing prominent figures, GlaxoSmithKline serious questionable actions. They could have helped the Japanese market to grow tremendously. Japanese scientists could have helped test new types of products to combat depression, had GlaxoSmithKline not covered up the results showing that Paxil did not work in some cases. GlaxoSmithKline could have worked together with the Japanese scientific community to produce a drug that could have been more efficient. With this, the Japanese people may have been more open to accepting Paxil because it would been recreated with the help of Japanese scientists. GlaxoSmithKline could have also marketed in a more honest way if they not marketed in a sneaky way. They could have capitalized on that there is currently no other drug that combats depression like Paxil. They also could have made it a point that they were working together with Japanese scientists to make Paxil

Open Document