How Did Raphael Contribute To The Abolition Of Private Property

1268 Words3 Pages

Another major problem that Raphael believes to be at the root of all society’s ill is private property. Every person needs property on his own. Marx describes, “Private property is the product, result, and necessary consequence of externalized labour, of the external relation of the worker to nature and to himself” (as cited in Hidalgo, 2013, p. 144). Property comes from mixing labour. The way we get private property is buying it with our money that is earned by doing labour. However, not everyone has an equal amount of property; people own surplus or have scarce of this private property. Raphael says that he is “persuaded, that till property is taken away there can be no equitable or just distribution of things, nor can the world be happily …show more content…

Raphael also said that, “as long as private property exists, the vast majority of the human race will have a life of hardship, poverty, and worry”. He is convinced that the abolition of private property is crucial in order for equality to exist. More disagrees and said, “It seems to me that men cannot live conveniently where all things are common. How can there be any plenty where every man will excuse himself from labour? For as the hope of gain doth not excite him, so the confidence that he has in other men’s industry may make him slothful. If people come to be pinched with want, and yet cannot dispose of anything as their own, what can follow upon this but perpetual sedition and bloodshed?” (UT) According to More, people cannot have prosperity with communal property. Collectivism cannot work because people are lazy, a production needs profit, and progress needs profit. Without a motive for profit, no one would work hard enough. The result would be shortages, riots, and murder (UT). This is true in our modern society because human beings are motivated by personal benefit and would stop working if there was no profit. Individual is not persuaded to work if incentives do not exist. For instance, an employee is willing to provide his labour, only if he/she receives job benefits, compensations, and rewards. The majority of people are motivated …show more content…

He describes how children are forced to work in order to support parents in factories. “When every member of the family works, the individual worker can get on with proportionately less, and the bourgeoisie has made the most of the opportunity of employing and making profitable the labour of women and children” (CW). He describes how women and children were often forced to do the work. Children under nine years of age were being sent down to work in mines or factories. “The number of children in the mills diminished somewhat, and the age at which they began to work rose a little; few children under eight or nine years were now employed” (CW). One of the major reasons for child labour is the growing gap between rich and poor because millions of young children are forced to work in order to support themselves and their families and thus prevent children from going to school. Child labour is a global phenomenon. Although the number of child labourers is declining, still 215 million children between ages of 5 and 17 caught in child labour. (International Labour Office, 2010, p. 5). Among them, 115 million child labourers are doing hazardous work (p. 5). Children are sent to work from the tender age because parents could not afford to send them to school. If the government and non-profit organization can take effective action such as interest-free loans and

Open Document