Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Imperialism and its impact
Imperialism and its impact
The belgians and private imperialism leopold 2 and the congo
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Imperialism and its impact
Imperialism has had a hand in changing the history of many countries that, otherwise, may very well be different now if it wasn’t for imperialism. Imperialism dates back to the late 1800’s. Imperialism is when a country or large power, usually for its own benefit, tries to extend its influence and power into other countries. Many times, imperialism had a negative effect on the country that was being affected by it, and caused the people to revolt, or resist the ruling power. Such was the case with the French ruling power in Vietnam, eventually causing a revolt and a war. Other examples of imperialism include Belgium in Congo, and Britain in India. Imperialism has had many long-lasting effects even showing in modern times, such as Congo and …show more content…
While the French were occupying Vietnam in the 1900’s, they had many policies and laws in place to give the native people less rights and freedom. The Vietnamese had little to no influence on politics while the French ruled, and generally weren’t allowed to vote or interfere with political matters. This quote shows how the Vietnamese felt about the French ruling politics in Vietnam: “They have acted contrary to the ideals of humanity and justice. In the Field of politics, they have deprived our people of every democratic liberty” (Ho Chi Minh). The French occupation of Vietnam also caused many economic problems. During the French rule, many people in Vietnam were poor and starving because of the economy. French influence on Vietnam has caused Vietnam to become a poor, impoverished country even in modern …show more content…
The Belgium government delegated rule of the country to King Leopold II in 1865. Under the Rule of Leopold, the people of Belgium suffered greatly, and the country as a whole was weakened because of it. King Leopold used forced labor and torture to stimulate trade and commerce for The Congo. This quote shows the effect that Belgium and King Leopold had on the Congo: “Working conditions in the Congo Free State were so brutal, taxes so high, and abuses so many that four to eight million Africans died under Leopold’s personal rule” (Bentley 540). The Belgium government allowing King Leopold to rule The Congo ended up severely weakening the Congo, and is even shown today as The Congo has a diminished economy, and the whole country is in a state of turmoil. Belgium rule of the Congo differs from India and Vietnam because Belgium paid less attention to it and rather than taking a more direct approach to ruling it, they delegated the rule to King Leopold. It is similar to India and Vietnam in the fact that imperialism had many negative effects on it, and ended up hurting more than
Vietnam has a very rich and culturally diverse background dating all the way back to 1066 when William the Conqueror invaded and paved the way for English colonization. The French had been colonizing since the 19th century. The French role in Vietnam's history is critical; they started out by bringing these simple peasants to the latest technology of farming and hunting (Yancey 37). The French helped these people out greatly in the beginning, but like all stories of occupation go, they just got worse. They started forcing rules and laws on the people of Vietnam.
At this time, Vietnam was a French colony. As time went on, tension started to come between the French and the Vietnamese people. As tension increased, so did the fighting between the French and the Vietnamese. Finally in 1954, the French decided that they could no longer withstand the revolts of the Vietnamese. The Vietnamese are now free of French rule.
Imperialism is the domination of a weaker country by a stronger country. For instance Britain dominated India and China in the mid 1880s to the beginning of the 20th century. Imperialism has had both a positive and negative effects on the countries involved. Britain was imperialistic for many reasons, it could dominate because it had the technology and power to do so. They also needed land to acquire raw materials for growing markets.
Imperialism is when a mother nation takes over another nation and become its colony for political, social, and economical reasons. Imperialism is a progressive force for both the oppressors (mother country) and the oppressed (colony), majorly occurring during the late 19th and early 20th century. It had more negative effects than positive effects due to its domination to other nations.
As a political figure, King Leopold of Belgium had minimal power, yet he acknowledged the political and financial advantages of colonization, and acquired the Congo as a private colony whereas Britain snatched up colonies globally, including the “crown jewel” of all colonies, India. Belgium and Britain demonstrated a stark contradiction of two opposing methods of colonization. These two countries methods’ of domination ultimately decide the fates of each party, conqueror and conquered, in the precarious gamble that is imperialism.... ... middle of paper ...
In 1940, the French were involved in the second world war. France fell to the Germans and the pro-German Vichy government was established, the Japanese took over Vietnam, Cambodia and laous. They allowed the French government to be in control. They had to control the country.
Vietnam War Survey 1. Since the 19th century, Vietnam had been under French colonial rule. During World War II, the country was taken over by Japanese control. Following the Japanese defeat in the war, Vietnam was back in the hands of the French; however, France was short of troops to occupy the nation. This led to the Nationalist Chinese forces occupying North Vietnam and British troops landing in the South to help the French (Hickman).
While Leopold II, the King of Belgium, desperately wanted an overseas colony, The Belgian people did not share his enthusiasm; which created the feelings of neglect and apathy Belgium had towards Congo. The Congo Free State, established “in the margins of the Berlin Conference” in 1885, allowed Leopold to “gain international recognition of his possession” which he had begun to take control of since the 1870s. However, while Leopold was securing control of the Congo, the Belgian people were not interested in controlling colonies, as they believed that colonies “would merely soak up resources that would be better used for social purposes at home.” Thus, the Belgian people decided to solve the problem of having an unwanted colony by separating the Belgian government from...
During the age of Imperialism, the Congo fell under the power of King Leopold of Belgium. Leopold Benefited from new technologies, cleverly exploited imperial rivalries between European powers in Africa, and used western ideological developments for his own gain, the Belgian king’s ambitions and greed were the most important factors in creating his atrocious Belgian free state. The creation of the Belgian ruled Congo led to the enslavement of native African tribes. Leopold and other European countries attempt to create an African empire were helped by new technologies.
This enacted the king to exploit the natives of the land for money. This often ended up with them being beaten and mistreated. In 1908 the power over the Congo switched from the King, to the government. This led to better treatment, but still did not allow the people of the Congo to have a say in what happens or the laws within their own homes. In 1960 rebellion began in Thysville.
When it came time to handing back power, it was easier for the British to do but difficult for the Belgium because Belgium had settlers from different class migrate and live in Congo and they were all treated with superiority compared to the other population and with that, the Belgium’s had no intention of going back or relinquishing power. While British used indirect rulership on its colonies Belgium used direct rulership, which leads to the Congo
Imperialism has definitely played its role in our lifetime as well as in the 19th century. First of all we attacked Iraq regarding a power issue. We believed they had some powerful items in which could be harmful to our nation so we decided to attack them to ensure our security. Another one is how we attacked Japan because they were becoming to powerful. We have done a lot to these countries just so we could have the security of keeping our power. Military reasons are also another reason for Imperialism.
In the 19th Century King Leopold II was the king of Belgium and he was looking for a way to expand his power and influence of the Belgium state. During this time imperialism was becoming very prominent, especially in European countries. Imperialism was a way for a country to easily gain wealth by implementing military force on another country or group of people. They would extract resources and goods from these places and, in its wake, imperialism destroyed these societies and their cultures. King Leopold II is a perfect example of European Imperialism and in his book King Leopold’s Ghost; Adam Hochschild details the effects that King Leopold II had on the Congo in Africa. Hochschild also argues that Leopold’s rule had an impact in the Congo
Great Britain controlled Nigeria, and the Congo was controlled by Belgium. They both were treated very badly. Although, Britain was not as cruel to Nigeria as Belgium was to the Congo. Nigeria was taken over in stages unlike the Congo which was rapidly attacked by King Leopold. Britain forced hard labor on all men between 15-50 years old, and women between 15-40. Meanwhile, in the Congo, everyone, including minors was forced to work. The Nigerians were forced to work jobs such as road making. Conditions were not great either: for every 1000 laborers, there were 24 deaths per year. Nigerians were also greatly taxed, but had no idea where their money was going. Britain used a system called “indirect rule” which basically meant they would rule Nigeria under remotely the same government. Overtime, the original government was completely forgotten about. Also, Britain took use of the palm nuts, kernels, cocoa, cotton, and peanuts that were grown in Nigeria. Although there was many negative things brought to Nigeria from Britain, Britain greatly attributed to the urbanization of Nigeria. With Britain came streets, larger towns, and many other necessities.The Congo could not relate to this fact. The Congo is still negatively being effected by King Leopold’s actions
Introduction: The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is a mineral rich country in the heart of southern Africa once controlled by Belgium. The division of land under the Berlin Conference in 1884 formed the Congo Free State, an area privately owned by Belgian corporations. After reports of abusive actions by these corporations, Belgium formally took control of what would be known as the Belgian Congo between 1908 and 1960 (Briticanna, 2014). Belgium adopted a paternalistic attitude with its colony.