How Did Frederick The Great Contribute To The Enlightenment

702 Words2 Pages

Frederick II, known as Frederick the Great, was Prussia’s king from 1740 to1786. He established Prussia as a strong military power by winning wars and expanding territories. After reading the three sources Frederick is similar to a political leader such as a governor, senator, or president. Frederick II was a very noble man; he combined the qualities of a warrior king with those of an enlightened despot. Rulers are relatable to political leaders they go through a great extent to make decisions that help shape the world. The thinkers of the Enlightenment objected to the absolute power of the royal rulers and of the Roman Catholic Church. During the Enlightenment they used reason, or logical thinking, and science to attack this power. Frederick …show more content…

These principles affected Europe and the rest of the Western world for years. All actions taken must be well reasoned, and all financial, political, and military matters must flow toward strengthening the state and furthering its power. It improved women rights granting those increased educational opportunities, revolutionary economic theories, and plenty of literature and music. The reasoning and problem solving made the Enlightment era pivotal. However, it took some people time to get use to the principles of the Enlightenment but it made a beneficial effect on their daily lives. It made people form a single body and not abuse their authority of power. The advancement of the Enlightenment transformed the Western world into an intellectual and self-aware civilization. The Enlightened Absolutists were Frederick the Great of Prussia, Catherine the Great of Russia, and Joseph II of Austria. Catherine was Empress of Russia from 1762 until 1796, the country’s longest –ruling female leader. Joseph II was Holy Roman Emperor from 1765 to 1790 and ruler of the Habsburg lands from 1780 to …show more content…

They must be active, hard-working, upright and honest, and concentrate their strength upon filling their office worthily. Also, all well conducted government must have an underlying concept so well integrated that it could be likened to a system of philosophy. One must act with honesty, wisdom, and complete disinterestedness in such a way he can render an account of his stewardship to the citizen at any moment. Last, one should improve the morals of the people, be the guardian of the law, and improve their education. Some statements in the reading that are contrary to principles of the enlightened government are, an sovereign is not elevated to his high position, supreme power has not been confined to him in order that he may live lazy luxury, enriching himself by the labor of the people. They have not been placed at the head of the state to keep around themselves a crowd of idle loafers whose uselessness drives them toward vice. One should not waste money of the people, the taxes which they have paid. A sovereign should not pervert the people in a bad

Open Document