Household Management Case Study

1080 Words3 Pages

a) According to Aristotle, the household is composed of three relationships: the one between the master and the slave, the husband and wife but as well the one between father and children. In addition “the art of household management” is related to the “art of acquiring property” ( for example instruments). For some people, the “art of getting wealth” is part of the “art of household management, but not for the author. He thinks that the “art of getting wealth” has as component trade and originated with the creation of coins. Furthermore , the “art of getting wealth” contains arts that are unnecessary and unlimited by nature, as well as ones that are necessary while the “art of household management” contains arts that are natural and only …show more content…

Everyone has the right to own the money, not only the Prince, as everyone has the right of property. In addition, the community has also the right to own the money, as Oresme explains with an example from the Genesis. b) The minting of coins generates a profit for the Prince because if the money is made at a lower rate than that it is exchanged the surplus goes to him. As he can fix the rate of the labour cost of the money, he can easily influence how much there is left for him c) A disadvantage that comes with the frequent alterations of coins is that it “ lessens the authority of the laws and the respect paid to them”, according to Aristotle. This can be explained by the fact that the frequency of the change of coins may cause people to think that the laws can easily be bent. Another disadvantage cited by Oresme is the fact that the Prince could if he wanted, enrich himself on the back of the people exchanging their coins. As explained before, the minting of coins generates a profit for the Prince. By augmenting the cost of making money, he can make sure that the money is worth less and take the profit, therefore robbing from his people, as Oresme puts it. In addition, the alternation of coins makes sure that people will look elsewhere to gain a higher value for their coins, so the materials to make the coins , such as gold and silver, slowly disapear from the …show more content…

The bees and the hive ( a metaphor for society and its citizens) do not function unless there is some vice. As the vices benefits the people in all the stages of society and that “Bare Virtue can’t make Nations live”( Mandeville, the Fable of the Bees, p37, 24) OT4: Hume a) Hume's argument against prohibition of exportation is logical. He states if the State allows the export of goods, then the country could grow more of this commodity and then have the best choice. b) If the “fourt-fiths of all the money in Great Britain to be annihilated in one night”, then the price of good and labour would go down. This would make the UK a cheaper alternative than the other nations. However, due to the competion, every other nation, like France, would also decrease their labour price, so the the UK looses its advantage and cause a economic crisis. c) Hume has a negative and critical opinion concerning the introduction of paper money. He states that it “raises proportionably the price of labour and commodities” ( p68). Hume also describes it as a stupic solution ( “What can be more shortsighted than our reasonings in this head”,p 68, third paragraph) d) The author thinks that certain taxes are useless, however some are necessary and stimulate the

Open Document