Homelessness Argumentative Essay

448 Words1 Page

The most common argument for not battling homelessness is the cost. Some opponents argue that battling homelessness would cost too much resources. They think that homeless people would siphon all funds in the government, but they fail to realize that helping the homeless is an investment. The government will end up saving money in the long run. It costs more to maintain homelessness in the long run. And also the former homeless person would be reinstituted into the community as a worker. “According to a University of Texas two-year survey of homeless individuals, each person cost the taxpayers $14,480 per year, primarily for overnight jail. A typical cost of a prison bed in a state or federal prison is $20,000 per year.” (endhomelessness.com). …show more content…

All the residents at this Housing First-styled residence had severe alcohol problems and varying medical and mental health conditions. When taking into account all costs – including housing costs – the participants in the 1811 Eastlake program cost $2,449 less per person per month than those who were in conventional city shelters, as described in the article from the Journal of American Medical Association.” (endhomelessness.com). “The study, conducted by the university’s Department of Social Work, found Moore Place saved $1.8 million in its first year by drastically reducing the amount of time its tenants spent in emergency rooms (447 fewer visits) and admitted to hospitals (372 fewer days). Statistics show tenants also stayed out of trouble more, with a 78 percent drop in arrests and 84 percent fewer days spent in jail.”(dailykos.com). There is actual evidence of battling homelessness and saving money. But government officials are afraid of losing money. They are timid about this proven plan and they do not think it is worth it to make this

Open Document