Hobbes Lord Of The Flies Comparison Essay

1075 Words3 Pages

Thesis: In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, the boys fail to effectively govern themselves because they lack enforcement of order and balanced power, which Hobbes and Montesquieu argued were necessary in creating an effective government. Because the boys lack these two necessary elements, the result is Jack gaining too much power and leading the group to chaos and anarchy. Hobbes believes the enforcement of order by a strong government is necessary for effective leadership, but because the boys on the island lack the enforcement of order, they ultimately fail to govern themselves, causing them to devolve to primitive beasts and descend into chaos. Hobbes is an English philosopher and known as founding father of modern political philosophy, …show more content…

Near the middle of the book, Jack calls for an assembly, and “[his] voice went up, tremulous yet determined, pushing against the uncooperative silence. ‘He’s like Piggy. He says things like Piggy. He isn’t a proper chief.’ Jack clutched the conch to him. ‘He’s a coward himself… He’s not a hunter. He’d never have got us meat. He isn’t a prefect and we don’t know anything about him. He just gives orders and expects people to obey for nothing’” (Golding 126). Ralph’s government has been shown to be quite close to Hobbes’ ideal government as he did attempt to enforce and listened to the boys’ problems, but Ralph did not enforce his power enough, which is significant as Jack is able to overthrow his power by belittling Ralph and encouraging others’ to rebel. Ralph’s failure to form a proper government allowed Jack to gain power and to become a dictator that encouraged chaos with hunting and violent acts, rather than order and reasoning. Jack’s power is wrongly given since it did not come from the boys’ deciding for their benefit, but rather was given because the boys dislike the rules Ralph set to keep order, and some follow

Open Document