History Of The Bat Trang Ceramics Village

2144 Words5 Pages

Brief historical account of the Bat Trang ceramics village
Bat Trang is a traditional craft village located within the proximity of the Hanoi along the Red River delta in northern Vietnam, which it shares similar demographic composition in terms of work force, accessibility, policies and governance contexts. For centuries, the villagers have produced porcelain pottery such as bowls and cups for household uses in small producers’ cluster groups under a collectivized structure introduced by the government under the socialist system in the 1970s. The village administration is in charge of the production planning of the ceramics of each producers and sales to the state-owned shops all over Vietnam. Ceramics production was not lucrative as it provided stable, yet low income and caused environmental problems since charcoal fired kilns are used to make the potteries. This resulted in a polluted and poverty stricken village where respiratory diseases were widespread.
During the 1980s, the government shifted towards a free market economy and introduced new liberalized legislations to bring about new opportunities of production technology and a bigger market; some of which were without state involvement. Some entrepreneurs tested out new ceramics baking technologies from German Development agency GTZ, like firing the kilns with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) to address the problems in the village problems by reducing the smoke emissions and quickening the production process. After a workshop organized by the state and GTZ to a small group of producers discussing about the new technology in detail, the villagers were keen in the new technology as it is cleaner and local officials and GTZ were motivated to continue support.
Small producers st...

... middle of paper ...

...nsibility for the environment which is why they decided to explore the new technology in the first place. Without an informal institutional, it would be difficult to resist a group of dominant actors within the actor-network as they would align and define specific roles during the problematization stage. While some may downplay the agency of non-human actors, the non-human actors in this case study highlights its importance relative to human actors. Lastly, the case study debunks the assumption that ANT is amoral where all actors are equal within network with no accommodation for power imbalances which the local small producers have a voice in the Ceramics association to be provided the option of free association to join the network as opposed to being forced.

All these point to a prospective value of actor-network theory in helping us understand development today.

Open Document