The world is integrated and interconnected as never before. Cheaper communication technologies, declining cost of transport and deregulation are all examples of developments facilitated by the trend known as Globalisation. Globalisation has transformed the world economy into one great economy, and most countries that use the democratic system as regime type and accept this new economy have been operating on an international scale. Thus one can say that globalisation is the shift towards a more interacted world economy. This internationalisation of the world economy has benefited industrialised countries that dominate world trade and finance, as well as poorer less-developed countries. Even though some may see it as bringing exceptional prosperity to everyone, everywhere – some countries have gained very little from this globalisation. This essay will focus on different perspectives with regards to positive and negative aspects of globalisation and why there have been significant differences in experience for certain nations.
To begin with, one should determine when and how globalism began. As argued by Nobel prize-winner Amartya Sen, globalisation is “neither new nor necessarily Western”. Because globalisation is often seen as domination from the West and they have always been ahead in terms of technology, modernity and innovation, critiques see the internationalisation of the world economy as solely beneficial for the already developed countries. In that view, capitalism and “greedy, grabby” countries mainly in Europe and the North of America have established rules, policies and terms and conditions that do not create an increased growth and development for the poorer nations. Nonetheless, Sen argues that globalisation has...
... middle of paper ...
... Globalisation carries negative as well as positive aspects- it deserves a reasoned defence, as it has connected cultures, information and technologies across nations. Nevertheless, reform needs to be considered and implemented if it is to remain in the future.
Works Cited
Anwar, Sajid. “Globalization and National Economic Development: Analyzing Benefits and Costs” in Journal of Business and Management Volume 8, (2002): 1-7.
Friedman, Thomas. The Lexus and the Olive Tree. (New York, NY. Anchor Books, 200).
Sachs, Jeffrey. “International Economics: Unlocking the Mysteries of Globalization”, in Foreign Policy, no.110 (Spring, 1998): 97-111.
Sen, Amartya. “How to Judge Globalism”, in The American Prospect Volume 12, no.1 (January 14, 2002): 30-36.
Stiglitz, Joseph. “Globalism’s Discontents”, in The American Prospect Volume 12, no.1 (January 14, 2002): 1-8.
Steger, M. B. (2003). The Economic Dimension of Globalization. Globalization: A Very Short Introduction. London: Oxford University Press.
Martell, Luke. "Conflicts in Cosmopolitanism and the Global Left." Policy Network. N.p., 17 Nov. 2011. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.
Dennis Pirages and Christine Sylvester (eds.), Transformations in the Global Political Economy (London: Macmillan, 1989).
Strange, S. (1994), ‘Wake up Krasner! The world has changed’, Review of International Political Economy, Summer 1994, 1 (2), pp. 209-20, Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Sassen, S. (1998). Globalization and its Discontents. In G. Bridge, & S. Watson (Ed.). The Blackwell City Reader (pp. 161-170). Oxford, U: Blackwell Publishing.
“Globalisation” is an old process that started way before the 20th century. In fact, the first signs of globalisation appeared with the first merchants that used to travel from a country to an another to buy and sell theirs goods. But “globalisation...
The question is to what extent should we embrace historical and contemporary perspectives with globalization and how cultural relations have suffered because of it. The source clearly acknowledges how globalization is “essential to creating growth and prosperity” which has helped the world change and grow. Also there are downfalls with globalization with cultural relations suffering from the cause and effect of nationalism and with how different cultures want to globalize. Globalization is positive movement to grow and prosper, but issues can and do develop while countries are aiming for change.
Many historians and sociologists have identified a transformation in the economic processes of the world and society in recent times. There has been an extensive increase in developments in technology and the economy as a whole in the twentieth century. Globalization has been recognized as a new age in which the world has developed into what Giddens identifies to be a “single social system” (Anthony Giddens: 1993 ‘Sociology’ pg 528), due to the rise of interdependence of various countries on one another, therefore affecting practically everyone within society.
Gilpin, Robert. Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. Print.
Balaam, David. Introduction to International Political Economy, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Pearson Education, 2005.
Just imagine waking up in squalor, a once prominent society, now a desolate wasteland. All because foreign interest has raped your land of its natural resources and you seen not a cent in profit. Although, globalization is unifying the worlds developed nations and is bringing commerce to nations that have struggle in past years. True, globalization has many positive effects but do the pros outweigh the cons. In this essay I will discuss Globalization ruining the integrity of many countries and also is forcing many undeveloped nations into a bind, and is causing economic distress on some developed nations. Also, due to economic globalization the nations of the world are diluting their culture, sovereignty, natural resources, safety and political system. My goal is not to change your way of thought, but only to enlighten you of the negatives of global economic expansion.
Baylis, Smith and Patricia Owens. 2014. The globalization of World Politics: An introduction to international relations. London. Oxford University Press.
Stiglitz, Joseph (2005), “The Overselling of Globalization,” in Bradley A. Thayer, Nuray V. Ibrayomova (eds.), Debates in International Relations (New York: Longman), 86.
Many negative and positive thoughts have been given to the process of globalization. The proponents of globalization rather see the benefits of globalization, while the opponents have based their opinions on the disadvantages of globalization.
Larsson, Thomas. The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization. Cato Institute, 2001.