Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bloody Sunday in easy words
Bloody Sunday in easy words
Different interpretations of bloody sunday
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bloody Sunday in easy words
Historical Interpretations of Bloody Sunday
There are lots of different views on Bloody Sunday about what actually
happened on the 30th of January 1972. The arguments are all down to
who shot first, the British Army or the IRA. The result of the
shooting was that thirteen innocent people were killed. An inquiry was
carried out by Lord Widgery, he criticised the shooting by the troops
but the report accepted that the army was fired upon. This report did
not please everyone and people thought that it was a cover up of what
really happened. Twenty six years later in 1998 a new inquiry was
announced by Prime Minister Tony Blair. The inquiry looks at both
sides of what happened and is interviewing everyone who was involved
in the event and to uncover the truth on what happened on the 30th
January 1972 known as Bloody Sunday.
Source A is a newspaper article from The Daily Mail printed on Friday
17th September 1999. The article is written by Paul Eastham who is the
Deputy Political Editor. Paul Eastham writes about what has been
happening in the inquiry and some of the problems which have come up.
The new inquiries on the events of the Bloody Sunday shootings are
being investigated by Lord Saville. The former Paratroopers and their
supporters were annoyed when a new forensic report was released. The
paratroopers believe that the report would change the public opinion
against them and even end up with people being put on trial. The
report was greeted with triumph from the Nationalist politicians and
the families who have longed for a new investigation. The Nationalists
wanted a new investigation because it was their fellow citizens who
...
... middle of paper ...
...unday had just happened. People may argue that medical science has
improved so that they can look at the pictures which were taken and
have a clearer idea about what happened than the scientists at the
time. Now that the event was twenty to thirty years ago it is harder
to find new evidence and to make a conclusion there are always people
saying that it is wrong and some evidence contradicts another piece of
evidence, so it is hard to find out which one is right. Some of the
evidence could be bias for example a Paratrooper wouldn’t say that he
didn’t see anyone with a gun, and he just shot innocent people. Also
any Irish witnesses at the time would likely be supportive of the IRA
because they were Catholics and would likely be supportive of the
IRA’s cause and so wouldn’t want to support the claims of British
Soldiers.
When all the evidence is noted (and there is even more beyond that which is stated here), one can not ignore the overwhelming presence of a
that are said like that might not always add up to make sense with an
Equality is not something we get to have when we come into this world. It is something that is being fought for and will continue to fight for as long as people think of themselves and do not think of the consequences that may occur from their own actions. In the book “Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt” by Chris Hedges and Joe Sacco they narrowed in on what structural violence is. The different examples of injustices that were occurring around the countries. Lastly explains the ways the oppressed used there actions, words, and ideas to fight the injustices. Injustices are all around world many of which still have a lot of control to this day and take a toll on the less able. Allowing large corporations to dictate what will be said and done.
Tragedy hit the docks of Everett, Washington, Sunday November 5, 1916 which would be known as “Bloody Sunday.” On November 5, 1916 the Everett Massacre was the culmination of labor trouble which had been brewing for months. It was one of the bloodiest single episodes of labor-related violence in the Pacific Northwest.
In the Bogside area of Derry, there was a tragic incident known as Bloody Sunday or the Bogside Massacre for sometimes. Twenty-eight unarmed civilians were shot down by equipped British soldiers when protesting internment without trial introduced to deal with the escalating level of violence peacefully.(Gillespie). As a reaction to the tragedy, Bano in an Irish band called U2 wrote a protest song called Sunday Bloody Sunday, in which he asked for the peaceful future without conflicts. Repeating “how long must we sing this song?” among the whole lyric, this protest song Bano wrote utilized a peaceful way to depict the scenes of Bloody Sunday, the loathing for the horrible massacre, and their beautiful expects for the future filling with hopes.
The Meaning of Bloody Sunday Bloody Sunday was an incident of January 22, 1905 where unarmed demonstrators marched to the Winter Palace present a petition to the Czar. They were gunned down by Imperial guards in St. Petersburg. The event was organized by Father Gapon, a paid agent provocateur of the Okhranka, the Czarist internal secret police. Father George Gapon founded the Assembly of Russian Factory and Plant Workers, an authorized and police-sponsored organization designed to deviate any unrest away from violent revolutionary activities. In December1904, there was a strike at Putilov plant.
On the 29th o April, 1977 Captain Cook, commander of a British fleet, landed on the eastern shore of Australia, in an attempt to claim the land under the name of Britain. The land was to be claimed by Britain as a land where the British government could send convicts; in an attempt to ease the struggle in the over flowing prisons. Upon Cooks arrival, he was ordered to follow three rules of claiming a foreign land. They were;
The 1920's were a time of Prohibition, Illegal Gambling, and Prostitution. The 18th amendment made the sale and distribution of alcohol illegal. Many people including Al Capone were involved in those illegal activities. Al Capone was notorious for this illegal activity. He got rich by manufacturing and distributing alcohol. He also owned many illegal bars. Many other gangs were doing the same illegal activity. There was competition over the alcohol. Every gang wanted it since that was how they made their money. In order to make money they had to eliminate the opposing gangs to decrease the competition. Al Capone never did any of the killings. He had his gang members do the killing. They would usually rent a room in front of the victim's house to stay hidden. Then they would wait for the victim to come outside. Then the gang members would shoot the person. Another way is they would do a drive-by and has someone in the car blast the victim with an Uzi or Thompson machine gun.
Civil rights refers to fighting for equal rights for all people and is an important part of history. From time to time, people have been fighting for civil rights for blacks in whites in the mid 1900’s. In fact, Bloody Sunday was probably one of the most important events to have an impact on history for civil rights. Everyday, people struggle to be treated equally and civil rights make it possible for everyone black or white to be treated equally. As a result of Bloody Sunday, this event helped blacks speak up and be heard.
The Bloody Sunday January 1972 has produced such different historical interpretations of what happened on bloody Sunday for a number of different reasons. The two big divides in what happened on that day are down to politics, religion and culture and the social society at that time in Ireland. As we know Ireland was facing many troubles politically and religiously, there seemed to be many marches and protests against the discriminate laws that persecuted the catholic people in Ireland. On the 30th of January 1972 a nationalist demonstration took place illegally in the centre of Derry, the police and government banned the march as they thought it would provoke violence. The march was lead by catholic supporters who were demonstrating against the protestant-biased law of internment for Catholics.
beliefs using logic and science. If you do, there is no way to prove the
first two ways are two proofs based on logic and observation of nature in proving God’s
Upon reading Will to Believe, there is no doubt we will all begin to question how we’ve gotten to our beliefs and why we believe what we do. William James argues against forced beliefs and expresses the importance of choice. The idea of choice is one I strongly agree with. Although we are easily influenced by others, when it comes to beliefs free will must come into play. As far as the science method, which I have discussed, a belief is just as valid whether there is evidence or not because most scientific methods will never be one hundred percent proven and they will change over
Christians. These facts however can be controversial to orthodox, how the Christians believe in the accurate
presents a clearer idea about what is held to be right or wrong; so, a