Hills Like White Elephants: A Literary Analysis

1017 Words3 Pages

Abortion is a personal and sensitive topic that has a long history. In different stories, the approach on the topic varies due to when the story was written or set in. Some stories make abortion seem as a downplayed topic that was a solution in order to get rid of something not desired in order to keep the same lifestyle they were living before receiving the news of pregnancy. In “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway and “Good People” by David Foster Wallace, the topic of abortion is treated as an unfamiliar, uncomfortable topic. The two main characters in both stories struggle individually to communicate how they each feel to the other person about the topic of abortion. In “Hills Like White Elephants” the male finds the idea …show more content…

Instead of saying the word abortion both the man and Jig call it an operation, “I really an awfully simple operation, Jig…it’s not really an operation at all” (Hemingway 116). The way the man is downplaying the abortion and how “it’s just to let the air in” (Hemingway 116), showcases how he thinks this is nothing. He is not putting himself in Jigs place. Readers are provided with insight into the characters thoughts and feelings since it is written in third-person omniscient. The writing style provides readers further understanding on these characters feel since both have a different opinion when it comes to the idea of Jig having an abortion. Jig thinks of the baby as a new beginning for them. When the man argues with her on how they can’t have it all if they keep the baby she firmly replies, “No, it isn’t. And once they take it away, you never get it back” (Hemingway 117). From that sentence, we can see how she understands how truly permeant this is and by seeing it in a way of being able to “have everything” (Hemingway 117). She is imagining having everything or in other words keeping the baby and having their relationship. For the man, he sees her being pregnant as an inconvenience since …show more content…

feels and what he thinks she will say. Through his thoughts, we see how he is struggling with the decision on whether or not the abortion should be done. Lane Dean Jr. describes himself as being at a stand still waiting for what Sherri will say, “…sitting here beside this girl as unknown to him now as outer space, waiting for whatever she might say to unfreeze him…” (Wallace 155). The fact this story doesn’t feature a dialogue between the two characters show how they almost are both waiting for the other to communicate how they feel. As time goes by and the sun comes over the couple we see as it starts to in a way melt him. He starts thinking about how she is feeling and what position this put her in “It will be terrible…the knowledge that she can neither do this thing today nor carry a child alone and shame her family. Her values blocked that way, either way, Lane could see, and she has no other options or choice” (Wallace 155). As the story progresses we see him put himself in Sherri’s position by coming up with her decision on keeping the child, “She will carry this, and have it, and love it and make no claim on Lane except his good wishes and respecting what she has to do. Comparing how the man in “Hills Like White Elephants” is to Jig, this is moment is where the two characters differ since as Lane Dean Jr. progresses throughout the story at the end he is able to really

Open Document