Hillel Schwartz's Fat And Happy

632 Words2 Pages

In the opening statement of his satirical article "Fat and Happy?" Hillel Schwartz, who earned a Ph. D. in European History from Yale University, claims, "Fatness is fine" (Schwartz 179). The author states that weight is not the cause of an obese person's health, but rather, the constant losing and gain weight that occurs during dieting. He also expresses that fatness has not been proven to cut life short (180). Overweight people, in the mind of Schwartz, are treated like minorities. He elaborates by saying, "Like other minorities, fat people are treated like children, given silly nicknames, considered socially and sexually immature" (180). Schwartz also discredits physicians for not taking responsibility for their patients by mocking their tactics of browbeating a sense of fear upon their patients. He also mentions that …show more content…

While Schwartz explains his utopian society, he suggests, "A fat society would be less harshly competitive, less devouring" (185). This may be true, but this is suggesting a communistic society. Selwyn Duke, political writer and columnist, talks about why a similar thinking of a utopian society in New Harmony, Indiana did not succeed. He states that Robert Dale Owen wished to created a secular commune in the 1820s which did not succeed. Duke explains, "...New Harmony wasn’t very harmonious: it started to disintegrate within a year" (Duke). Schwartz implies throughout his explanation of his theoretical society that it would create better environment of living. This assumption may be accurate; however, the probability of this utopian society to even last would be unlikely due to the history that follow niche utopias. Schwartz, despite creating an unconventional theoretical, introduces the issue of social harassment towards overweight people

Open Document