Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the causes and effects of fast food consumption
The risk and effects of fast food
The risk and effects of fast food essay pdf
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Political cartoons, normally made to pick fun of or shine some light on various topics are used to explain different political ideas and standings. They in a way help us understand in a bias way the crazy world of politics that we live in today. Throughout this journal I will go about explaining many of these political cartoons. I saw this cartoon poking fun of Hillary Clinton to be quite comical. It depicts her being shredded by a paper shredder that she in turn is using to shred various documents and in this case her emails. The cartoonist represented Hillary with a large protruding nose that I believe symbolises her lying about not actually deleting those said documents. She is also depicted as sweating profusely with that of a nervous look …show more content…
This particular cartoon interested me because I feel that it is all too true in this country today. The artist depicts a large obese U.S. citizen smoking, drinking, and eating exceedingly large amounts of unhealthy fast food. Upon participating in all of these actions that kill roughly 838,000 Americans every year combined he is more scared with an Ebola outbreak than with the effect of his current actions on his health. The use of the term Ebola is bolded showing its emphasis in the hearts of United States citizens even though that problem is easily contained unlike the rampant deaths caused by obesity, tobacco use and alcohol consumption. We had an Ebola outbreak that was contained in the southern states of the U.S. putting fear into many people 's hearts masking the real problems occurring in this country. I feel the artist did a wonderful job in depicting how many Americans felt during the time of the Ebola outbreak. Though recently problems such as obesity and tobacco use have been attempted to be destroyed, I believe that the United States is more fearful of the unknown in a sense or illnesses such as …show more content…
This final cartoon fits in quite nicely with many of the topics we have discussed in class. The artist depicted an angry mob of U.S. citizens carrying wooden boards chasing American Indians out of their country. To me that was just ironic because the mob chasing the Indian are the actual immigrants within this country. Personally, I think the stigma behind immigration reforms involving American Indians is a joke because this is their country and we are the immigrants in most cases. The angry mob stated “Immigrants go back to where you came from” and the Indian man responded with “Took the words right out of my mouth.” The dialogue within this political cartoon was quite comical in a sense because Native Americans saw Anglos as the immigrants to their land. The basic knowledge of knowing that Native Americans are indigenous to the Americas and the struggle that they have endured from intruding Anglos is sufficient background information to analyze this cartoon. I believe that the artist 's intended message was to explain why we should not push immigration onto the American Indians when we are the culprits and Immigrants of this country who destroyed their cultural roots. Political cartoons can be beneficial tools in explaining and understanding political problems happening not only in the United States, but globally as
Although the author’s words are simple, they create a mood into the illustrations that truly emphasise the emotion of the indigenous point of view. Viewers can than feel more of what they can see, an example of this is when the authors used different sized text in “stole our children.” This text with the illustration can truly create an effect on the way it is read and viewed by, making viewers feel empathy as the size of each words shrinks defining the children’s positon as they get further away from their parent. This attains the Europeans guilt on the choices they had made as the story is seen in the indigenous point of view on how they suffered due to the past horrendous choices made by the Europeans at that
...d Native Americas in a negative light, such as Carl Wimer’s Abduction of Daniel Boone’s Daughter, George Caleb Bingham’s Concealed Enemy, and Horatio Greenough’s The Rescue. These two paintings and statue in particular should be included because they depict the views of people in that era. The view of Native Americans was that of savagery. In the painting by Wimer the woman is depicted a fair skinned maiden, due to the white dress who is being brutishly taken away. The statue by Greenough, which depicts a man protecting his family from a savage Native American, was outside of the United States Capital for nearly a hundred years before it was taken down. These views of indigenous people during the 19th century have lasting impacts on our country. It is our job to tell the real story of what happened to the Native Americans as victims of our view of manifest destiny.
The depiction of Native Americans to the current day youth in the United States is a colorful fantasy used to cover up an unwarranted past. Native people are dressed from head to toe in feathers and paint while dancing around fires. They attempt to make good relations with European settlers but were then taken advantage of their “hippie” ways. However, this dramatized view is particularly portrayed through media and mainstream culture. It is also the one perspective every person remembers because they grew up being taught these views. Yet, Colin Calloway the author of First Peoples: A Documentary Survey of American Indian History, wishes to bring forth contradicting ideas. He doesn’t wish to disprove history; he only wishes to rewrite it.
While both political cartoons indicate anti-immigration sentiments after the influx of European immigrants, “Columbia’s Unwelcome Guests” focuses on the nature of immigration due to U.S. immigration polices while “The Mortar of Assimilation” addresses the struggle of attaining Americanization.
The noose, Klan hood, and the Native American headdress represent how America mistreats other people. The noose and the Klan hood show that America is a place that discriminates against black people in its own society. Even though the Nazi party murdered millions of people in cold blood, they still saw our racism as a point they could use to persuade their citizens that we are evil. The Native American headdress has the same metaphor but for the Native American people. Our ancestors killing the Native Americans is another example of how we are malicious. It is saying “Look what they did to the blacks and Native Americans, they will invade us and will treat our people the same way!”. The American flag is a fascinating part of this poster. The
The artwork displayed in this cartoon is presented in such a way that anyone can understand the meaning of such symbols such as the twitter bird. The assumption that Donald Trump’s intelligence is at a smaller scale than that of Hilary Clinton is derived from the depiction of his smaller brain. Finally, MacGregor’s depiction of a mocking grin on Hilary’s face draws the attention of the audience and provokes a sense of humor and favoritism. Furthermore, it is evident to conclude that the cartoon is under the assumption that Hilary knows she is a better candidate based on her qualifications and experience with the government. Nevertheless, the enlarged puckered lips on Donald Trump’s face conducts a reasoning that most would assume he is bothered and will indeed repel against anyone who opposes his will. Overall, Doug MacGregor does an exceptional job by evoking emotions towards a massive audience of American citizens with his political
It appears the caricature of Native Americans remains the same as first seen from the first settler’s eyes: savage-like people. Their culture and identity has become marginalized by popular culture. This is most evident in mainstream media. There exists a dearth of Native American presence in the mainstream media. There is a lack of Native American characters in different media mediums.
This article really caught my attention and my eye. This article is very historical and has facts within it that date back to the 1700’s. The article talks about how political cartoons play a part with an election. Specifically the presidential elections and how each and every year cartoonist depicts the candidates as a some sort of superhuman. I believe that this article gives people some background on political cartoons and how they have helped play a part within the U.
In the political cartoon 5A, the first reaction you have is to laugh without knowing the deeper meaning behind it, and I guess that’s most people reaction if they don’t read the captions. In my opinion this cartoon represent two events of our country’s history, the “Democratic Split” and “The Nomination of Lincoln”. The main characters in this political cartoon are Abraham Lincoln, Douglas, and John C. Breckinridge. The chief symbols in this cartoon is the two rodents that’s split at the tail. Another chief symbol is the way Abraham Lincoln is carrying the two rodents on a stick, like they are very poisonous and the need to be gotten rid of. The split tail rodents represent the Democratic Party and how they are breaking apart and not working together. It represents how the Democratic Party is corrupt. The way the “Old Abe” is carry these two rodents is how anyone in NYC today reacts to the rats in the subway station, ‘They need to get rid of’; and that is what I think the artist of the cartoon was trying to portray, that Abraham Lincoln had to get rid of the pest that’s corrupting our nation.
The underlying theme is that throughout the hardships and adversity forced onto the Indians, they find a way trough the triumph of human spirit and it's own agency to emerge with their tribal identities intact, but one that is revered as an inspiration to all people striving through injustices and discrimination to endure and push forward for equality. I believe that so much can be learned from the history of the Indians and can serve as a template for the future of ow people of different cultures should be treated, because we can now look at the injustices that were committed against this group of people, and how we as people of the world can avoid repeating these kinds of practices from happening.
Terrorism has been a worldwide problem this past year causing mixed feelings, anxiety, and more awareness. Political cartoons are said to be an exaggerating and categorizing opinion of a persons’ point of views. In the drawing by Nate Beeler, Trump is unfairly prejudicing Muslims which seems to be acceptable by Adolf Hitler. The exaggeration could be understandable, but the truth underlying it could just be the obvious. The artist gives the impression of saying Donald Trump’s statements and ideas leave him to be identified with Hitler. The work is representing the idea that Trump’s discriminatory views towards all Muslims, including innocent, is no different than Hitler’s ideas pertained to the innocent Jews, making them to be in the same category. The artist can cause so many opinions, emotions, and thoughts just by adding this simple character to his work.
Immigrants have been a vital part of the U.S. ever since the day the country was founded. But perspectives on immigrants have varied through time and one of the most popular ways of presenting them was through political cartoons. From the 1860s-1910s one of the biggest issues the U.S. was facing was how to properly regulate the flow of immigrants into the country. We also see this tying of Americanness and whiteness, where even certain Europeans weren’t considered full American even though they were white. White Americans wanted more white seeming migrants which would help further establish the American identity as white. The political cartoons show the shifting perspective placed on immigrants, from a universal fear of them, to a more divided
Baca asks “Do they come on horses with rifles, and say, ese gringo, gimme’ your job?” (3) The answer is no; for the most part Mexican immigrants take jobs that many Americans don’t want. Most people that cross the border do so to provide for their family, or to have a better life. As a result, they take jobs that pay them pretty much nothing. He later states that Americans should actually look at the bigger picture. Mexicans need the jobs to feed and provide for their children. Baca’s use of imagery, and symbolism paint the picture of American hypocrisy on Mexicans taking away American jobs. Baca mocks the racist commentary made by Americans to help the reader rethink the situation to show how ludicrous this misconception is.
Many people of color take offense to seeing their culture used as creative inspiration in stereotypical and discourteous ways. Native Americans don't appreciate insensitive Americans using their likeness in a dehumanizing fashion and referring to it as paying homage. In the future, its critical that people in America today realize how wrong it is to use someone's culture as creative inspiration. The cultures of people of color are not trends. We also need to see the dehumanization that occurs when we use the likeness of a person the same way we would use an animal's. In order for us to all get along in this diverse country, we must be compelled to learn respect for each others
In this political cartoon we clearly see a call to the National Recovery Administration (NRA) after taking into consideration the fact that it was created by Jim Morin in direct correlation to the shooting at the movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. We can see that this was made to mock the United States Government and its lack of initiative in resolving the tragedy that occurred. The man with the NRA hat is clearly controlling the government as they say that “we…will do nothing about it,” showing their strong influence over the nation’s leaders and their authority.