Perhaps the three most influential men in the pre-Civil War era were Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster. These men all died nearly a decade before the civil war began, but they didn’t know how much they would effect it. States’ rights was a very controversial issue, and one which had strong opposition and radical proposals coming from both sides. John C. Calhoun was in favor of giving states the power to nullify laws that they saw unconstitutional, and he presented this theory in his “Doctrine of Nullification”. Daniel Webster strongly disagreed with this proposal and showed this by giving powerful support to President Jackson in resisting the attempt by South Carolina to nullify the ‘tariff of abominations’, as they called it; a shipping tax passed in 1828 that they saw as unfairly favoring the industrial North. Henry Clay, the Great Compromiser, didn’t seem to be partisan either way, and, although he was a Whig, always came up with a way to please both sides of any argument.
John C. Calhoun proposed the states’ right theory and attempted to enact nullification twice, after each of two tariffs that South Carolinians saw as one sided and unconstitutional was passed, first in 1828 and the second in 1832. Calhoun felt that his beloved South Carolina, and the south in general, were being exploited by the tariffs. These pieces of legislature, Calhoun argued, favored the manufacturing interests in New England and protected them from fore...
On the question as to whether states’ rights was the cause of the Civil War, Dew references a speech made by Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederate States of America, during his inaugural address as one that “remains a classic articulation of the Southern position that resistance to Northern tyranny and a defense of states’ rights were the sole reason for secession. Constitutional differences alone lay at the heart of the sectional controversy, he insisted. ‘Our present condition…illustrates the American idea that governments rest upon the consent of the governed, and that it is the right of the people to alter or abolish governments whenever they become destructive of the ends for which they were established’”(13).
In The article “Slavery, the Constitutional, and the Origins of the Civil War”, Paul Finkelman discusses some of the events that he believes lead the United States to have a Civil War. He discusses how both the North and the South territories of the Untied States did not see eye to eye when it came to ab...
Calhoun saw himself as the heir of Thomas Jefferson and the Republican tradition, but he was a reactionary Republican that rejected both the liberal philosophy of
Henry Clay, one of America’s greatest legislators and orators, lived from 1777 to 1852. In his lifespan, Henry was a very successful attorney, a well respected farmer, a horse race enthusiast, and a “Great Compromiser”. The name “Great Compromiser” comes from the fact that Clay was very good at negotiation. With this skill at hand, Henry was able to avoid the Civil War until it could not be adverted.
...ld not protect the interest of the Southern states. Coupled with the hostilities, lack of votes for Lincoln from the South and disregard for the constitutional protection of slavery is a justifiable reason from the Southern leaders to secede from the Union.
Nullification is a precursor to secession in the United States as it is also for civil wars. However, in contrast, the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions did not suggest that states should secede from the union. Under the direct vigilance and radical views of Calhoun, he suggested that states should and could secede from the union if they deem a law was unconstitutional. Calhoun’s reputation as a “Cast Iron” proved fittingly as compromises were reached for the proposed Tariffs. The southern states contribution to the financial welfare of the union as a result of slavery was undoubtedly substantial, but as history unfolded, it was not a just means to financial stability. His views of constitutional propriety was for the “privileges of minority” rather than for the “rights of the minority.” [2]
The power of the federal government can also be seen during Lincoln’s presidency at the time of the Civil War. He swayed the entire purpose of the war to something far off from what had been the initial purpose. From fighting for the preservation of the Union, Northerners readily began to accept that the abolition of slavery was the cause of the war for them, not the Union. Lincoln and his power made this happen.
12,000 years ago, the discovery of agriculture triggered such a change in society and the way in which people lived that we now call this important era in time the “Neolithic Revolution.” Traditional hunter-gatherer lifestyles were cast away in favor of more permanent settlements and a reliable food supply. Agriculture helped form cities and civilizations, and because crops and animals could now be farmed to meet growing demand, populations skyrocketed from around five million people 10,000 years ago, to more the more than seven billion people that walk this earth today.1
The Neolithic revolution is the domestications of plants animals by people with that used stone-based technologies, and it began 10,000 years ago. What made this period revolutionary was the transition from an economy based on hunting, fishing, and gathering, to food production. The switch to food productions was not quick; it took many years, it grew directly from the Mesolithic. During the Mesolithic, the warmer climates replaced the barren tundra with forest. This caused many herd animals that which Northern Paleolithic people depended on for clothing, food, and shelter to disappear from many areas. Some animals such as the musk ox and the caribou went to colder climates. The mammoths died out completely. Without the massive wild herds, hunting became
Due to the fact of this, the public domain has no knowledge of some occurrences during the Neolithic Revolution. The Neolithic Revolution made a foundation for the world’s future. The Neolithic Revolution essentially changed the world with its many contributions. These contributions and new ideas became the “way of the world”, and although better and improving innovations- it is still the same with the
Around 10,000 BP the tools that the hunter-gatherers once used for gathering seeds and scraping meat were starting to be used to grind the domesticated grains that the Neolithic society started harvesting. Wild gazelles, goats, and sheep that once roamed in the wild were starting to be domesticated for human exploitation . This transition from hunting and gathering to the practice of agriculture is known as the Neolithic revolution and is also known as the agricultural revolution. The Neolithic Revolution is among some of the most important revolutions in human history. Though the agricultural revolution produced useful inventions that the human population still uses to this day, it also came with consequences such as the spread of disease, poor nutrition, an unfair social structure, and environmental abuse among the Neolithic society.
The neolithic revolution had a huge influence on globalization by making it possible. When people stopped their nomadic lifestyle and started settling, they could produce a surplus of goods and trade with other settlements. The inhabitants of a settlement would act they why they feel the need to and start to form customs, traditions, and their own culture. Settlements could then learn about the neighboring people and their cultures, or destroy them. Both are good in ways.
The history and the existence of the Old Stone Age, or the Paleolithic era, has an undeniably large effect on our society today. Living in the harsh environment of the world without the technological advancements seems hard enough, but surviving without the elements for living prepared for them is even more difficult. With all the common behaviors that were translated to our everyday life, healthy diets that prevent humans from disastrous results, new innovations that remained useful to us today, and surviving skills that were passed down from generation to generation, our whole society owes everything to those of the Paleolithic era. Without them, there would be no “us” today to walk the earth as a prosperous species.
The discovery of agriculture has led to many profound changes in society. From its origin during the Neolithic era, to its evolution throughout modern society, agriculture has formed and shaped human society to what it is today. Without agriculture, society would still be a hunting and gathering community. However, because of the uncovering of agriculture, early humans were able to grow crops and domesticate animals. Moreover, farming has made a fundamental impact in today’s modern world. Early civilizations greatly utilized this new development by increasing their presence and influence throughout the world. Because agriculture evolved, the population increased, villages and towns emerged, and urban life developed during ancient society.
The Neolithic Revolution while fantastic did one thing that would change the course of history, it was at its heart the domination of humans over everything else. As the author explains, “ The Old World Neolithic Revolution, for all it's dazzling advantages in metallurgy, the arts, writing, politics, and city life was at its base a matter of direct control and exploitation of many species for the s...