Harriet Jacobs And Nat Turner's Rebellion In America

723 Words2 Pages

With movements such as Nat Turner’s rebellion in Virginia in 1831, Southern whites felt strongly pressured to defend slavery. Many attempted to justify their actions and state that slavery was good for society; “a positive good rather than a necessary evil”. Southern whites had the idea of Paternalism meaning it was their duty to protect and take care of their slaves and they were considered family. However, slaves such as Harriet Jacobs and Solomon Northup thought differently. Harriet Jacobs was treated more as property than a family member and thousands of slaves such as Northup were punished harshly for miniscule reasons. Slaveholders such as John Pendleton Kennedy believed slavery was a mutual agreement and that slavery helped both the …show more content…

They had comfortable living spaces, garden patches where they can grow their own vegetables, and masters that listened to their wants and needs. In Kennedy’s Swallow Barn, it is stated that “I think them the most good-natured, careless, light-hearted and happily constructed human beings I have ever seen”. Slaveholders believed that slaves depended on the white race for guidance and protection, and without it they would not survive by themselves. Another example of this is in Management of Negroes Upon Southern Estates: “He is by far happier than he would be if emancipated, and left to think, act, and provide for himself”. Slaveholders in Mississippi claimed they had great living conditions for their slaves. They had beds, multiple meals per week, dinner cooked for them, ovens and skillets provided to them, and preachers that preach to …show more content…

Solomon had the unique experience of being a free man for decades before being captured and enslaved, and that greatly challenges proslavery claims made by the Southern whites stating that slaves could never survive on their own without them. Solomon’s first owner, William Ford, could be compared to proslavery claims of how well slaveholders treat their slaves. Ford treated his slaves well and Solomon believed if Ford had grown up under different influences, he would not be a slaveholder at all because he was such an honorable man. Solomon’s second master, John Tibeats, was the complete opposite image of what proslavery southerners were trying to prove. “He was ignorant, withal, and of a revengeful disposition…Certain it is, it was a most unlucky day, for me that brought us together”. Solomon was barely allowed to have any rest, worked long hours, and was never spoken to politely by Tibeats. Harriet Jacobs also had similar experiences as Solomon, but was even more oppressed than others because she was a woman. Jacobs was sexually exploited by her master for years and treated like she was property. There was not one recollection of Harriet Jacobs experiencing anything enjoyable about slavery; only suffering and punishment which threatens proslavery claims. Many slaves tried to challenge the notion of slavery by escaping or fighting back. Solomon fought back by whipping

Open Document