Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A little learning poem analysis
Analysis of poems
Analysis of poems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
While studying new criticism and reader response we were told to read the poem “The Mother” by Gwendolyn Brooks. Throughout this essay I will be applying what I have learned in class to help dissect that experience to clearly differentiate both. First I will talk about new criticism and what it was like reading “The Mother” through that style. Then I will continue on to reader response and share the journey through our reading with that style. After that I will compare the similarities between both styles. Finally, to conclude I will briefly discuss which one I preferred more. New Criticism was clearly laid out by three important facts in our “Texts and Contacts” book:
“1. The work itself should be your focus-not the author’s intention, not
…show more content…
It wasn’t that enjoyable for me as well. While reading this poem I had to remember that everything essential for me to know was in the poem itself. I needed to find the unifying idea that held it all together to form my conclusion. Through new criticism I had to be very literal. So it brought up things like how can she be a mother if she has never had any children? How can she love something that was never created? How could she have destroyed something that was never created? My conclusion from this reading was that though the speaker never had children she is calling herself a mother because of the love she had for her aborted children. Not that much fun of a conclusion. Seems very easy to get to, however, the difficult part for me was staying straight on the text. I found myself a couple of times wanting to add my feelings or thoughts to form my conclusion. But, according to new criticism that would be incorrect.
Now, reader response criticism is very different. In our text book for class it is portrayed by these three key facts:
“1.The reader response is what counts. We can’t know for sure what an author intended, and the text itself is meaningless unless a reader responds.
2. Readers actively create (rather than passively discover) meanings in texts, guided by certain goals and rules that may be personal or shared with other members of a community.
3. Responding to a text is
…show more content…
This sometimes would add to or change your initial thought. There were so many more conclusions when speaking with my group on reader response. For example, Elsy one of the girls in my group enjoyed of the poem was structured. The poem brought up questions just like mine on how she could say that she is so regretful yet supposedly do it more than once. The great thing about reader response is that it allows you to ask questions like that. To look at little things and maybe it would change your whole opinion on something. Like when going through the passage I felt sorry for her pain through her imager, but when I got to the end and saw the “I loved you all” I was like “wait a minute” and completely changed my feelings towards her. I was allowed to change my feelings and thoughts toward the work because of that one sentence. Where with new criticism you can’t do that. Reader response also allowed us to talk about things and have thoughts brought up that we didn’t even think of ourselves. When discussing the reading with the other girl in my group Jessieka she brought up how she was offended for people who wear told they couldn’t have kids. This wouldn’t have mattered in new criticism, that thought hadn’t even crossed my mind, but after she mentioned it I was like “Yeah that’s true too!” Reader response is so much
basic charge of this criticism can be stated in the words of a recent critic,
These two critics are bold but necessary for the enjoyment of the vast audience. When reading the first chapter, for example, the excessiveness of names was confusing. Yes, the examples such as Katherine Branch to John Bradford were entertaining but hard to keep track of (Hall 21). It came to a point where names got mixed up which this dampened the enjoyment of reading. Next, the chapters were vast and it seemed never ending. It is highly recommended to have shorter chapters to give the book a sense of cohesion. These two examples did not hinder the book information wise but to a reader, fixing these minor problems will offer more joy to the
Gwendolyn Brooks' poem "The mother" tells us about a mother who had many abortions. The speaker is addressing her children in explain to them why child could not have them. The internal conflict reveals that she regret killing her children or "small pups with a little or with no hair." The speaker tells what she will never do with her children that she killed. She will "never neglect", "beat", "silence", "buy with sweet", " scuffle off ghosts that come", "controlling your luscious sigh/ return for a snack", never hear them "giggled", "planned", and "cried." She also wishes she could see their "marriage", "aches", "stilted", play "games", and "deaths." She regrets even not giving them a "name" and "breaths." The mother knows that her decision will not let her forget by using the phrase "Abortions will not let you forget." The external conflict lets us know that she did not acted alone in her decision making. She mentions "believe that even in my deliberateness I was not deliberate" and "whine that the crime was other than mine." The speaker is saying that her decision to have an abortion was not final yet but someone forced her into having it anyway. The external conflict is that she cannot forget the pain on the day of having the abortions. She mentions the "contracted" and "eased" that she felt having abortions.
Writing a journal from the perspective of a fictional eighteenth century reader, a mother whose daughter is the age of Eliza's friends, will allow me to employ reader-response criticism to help answer these questions and to decipher the possible social influences and/or meanings of the novel. Though reader-response criticism varies from critic to critic, it relies largely on the idea that the reader herself is a valid critic, that her critique is influenced by time and place,...
With all the different types of literature we have in our world, we also have a similar amount of interpretations of those pieces of literature. Each interpretation is as valid as the other. Literature not only allows the writer to create a wonderful world and a story, it allows the reader to fully embrace the story and find meaning out of it. There are also many different types of literary criticisms. These criticisms are vehicles or guidelines for us to use to understand the reading in a very specific way and really pinpoint the issues and overall theme of the story.
A traditional method assumes that the criticism involves both explication of what actually went on when the speaker engaged his or her audience, and an evaluation of how well the speaker performed the task of changing the audiences’ perspective of reality. It is also assumed that the traditional method will create a feeling of identification and sense of relatedness between the speaker or writer and the
Brooks was the first child of David and Keziah Brooks. She was born on June 7, 1917 in Topeka, Kansas. Brooks wrote her first poem when she was 13 years old and was published in the children’s. Moreover she was the first black author to win the Pulitzer prize. magazine. In 1938 she was married to Henry Blakely and had two children. After a long battle of cancer Brooks died in December 3, 2000.
The question of how to find a safe shelter for Estevan and Esperanza, and the equally worrisome question of what is to become of Turtle. The definition of a readers response is to examine, explain, and defend your personal reaction to a text. Jack later explained that “After these elements were in place after the story posed its two central problems and began bringing it all home, it lost its immediacy for me.” He eventually quit caring so deeply for the characters of the novel, because Taylor and many of the other characters have the right attitude and are too perfect to be considered realistic. Butler addresses his reaction as being small minded but also asks who can be against the things this book is against? He thinks that towards the end of the book there is a sudden rise in conflicts but they are quickly dismissed. Jack says, “At one point late in the book, Turtle experiences a frightening reminder of her early horrors, and much is made of the damage this sort of reoccurrence can do - but then the subject is
These final words sum up her feeling of helplessness and emptiness. Her identity is destroyed in a way due to having children. We assume change is always positive and for the greater good but Harwood’s poem challenges that embedding change is negative as the woman has gained something but lost so much in return.
New Criticism attracts many readers to its methodologies by enticing them with clearly laid out steps to follow in order to criticize any work of literature. It dismisses the use of all outside sources, asserting that the only way to truly analyze a poem efficiently is to focus purely on the words in the poem. For this interpretation I followed all the steps necessary in order to properly analyze the poem. I came to a consensus on both the tension, and the resolving of it.
Through diction, the tone of the poem is developed as one that is downtrodden and regretful, while at the same time informative for those who hear her story. Phrases such as, “you are going to do bad things to children…,” “you are going to suffer… ,” and “her pitiful beautiful untouched body…” depict the tone of the speaker as desperate for wanting to stop her parents. Olds wrote many poems that contained a speaker who is contemplating the past of both her life and her parent’s life. In the poem “The Victims,” the speaker is again trying to find acceptance in the divorce and avoidance of her father, “When Mother divorced you, we were glad/ … She kicked you out, suddenly, and her/ kids loved it… ” (Olds 990). Through the remorseful and gloomy tone, we see that the speaker in both poems struggles with a relationship between her parents, and is also struggling to understand the pain of her
Form and meaning are what readers need to analyze to understand the poem that they are evaluating. In “Mother to Son”, his form of writing that is used frequently, is free verse. There is no set “form”, but he gets his point across in a very dramatic way. The poem is told by a mother who is trying to let her son know that in her life, she too has gone through many frustrations just like what her son is going through. The tone of this poem is very dramatic and tense because she illustrates the hardships that she had to go through in order to get where she is today. She explains that the hardships that she has gone through in her life have helped her become the person that she has come to be. Instead of Hughes being ironic, like he does in some of his poems, he is giving the reader true background on the mother’s life. By introducing the background, this helps get his point across to the reader in a very effective way. In this poem there are many key words which help portray the struggles that the mother is trying to express to her son. The poem is conveyed in a very “down to earth” manner. An example of this is, “Life for me ain’t been a crystal stair (462).” This quote shows the reader that the mom is trying to teach the son a lesson with out sugar coating it. She wants her son to know that throughout her life has had many obstacles to overcome, and that he too is going to have to get through his own obstacles no matter how frustrating it is. Her tone throughout the poem is stern telling the boy, “So boy, don’t turn your back (462).” The poems tone almost makes the reader believe that the mother is talking to them, almost as if I am being taught a valuable lesson.
Harrington concludes by talking about the overarching aims of the “exegesis” method and further talks about the factors that affect interpretation which are more fundamental, like pre-existing biases and
We can say that Reader-oriented theories have no single or predominant philosophical starting point. There are quite different writers that commented on the reader response and they belong to different traditions of thought. They seriously challenge the predominance of the text-oriented theories of New Criticism and Formalism. As for them it is impossible to talk about the meaning of a text without considering the reader’s contribution to it. We see an interesting explanation about reader-response criticism by Tompkins. She claims that “reader response criticism is not a conceptually unified critical position, but a term that has come to be associated with the work of critics who use the words reader, the reading process, and response to mark out an area for investig...
Literature is an intricate art form. In order to attempt to understand the meanings and ideas within literary work, there are many forms of criticism that propose different approaches to its interpretation. Each criticism is crucial to the understanding of how individuals interpret literary works. Since each criticism has a different approach to enrich the understanding literary works, the question is raised whether one criticism should be used over others, whether a certain combination of criticisms should be used, or whether all criticisms should be taken into account. This may all be dependent on the reader’s individual preference or opinion, but each criticism presented builds on the others to create a well-rounded and unique understanding