Guisti Fraud Case Study

782 Words2 Pages

♣ Guisti was able to commit the fraud because he was a trusted 14-year employee, previous internal auditor, and manager of a Greater Providence Deposit and Trust. He was authorized to make consumer loans up to a certain dollar limit, starting at $10,000 and increasing to $15,000 and then $25,000, without loan committee approvals. He used this authority to create 67 fraudulent 90-day notes requiring no collateral or the applicant’s credit history report which should have been purchased from an independent credit rating firm. As the scheme progressed, he was able to bypass the loan committee approval as some of his loans exceed his loan limit.
♣ Guisti was able to conceal the scheme by making the 67 loans out in five names. The names included …show more content…

♣ Opportunities: Guisti was the manager of a North Providence branch office, a trusted 14-year employee who had once worked as one of the bank’s internal auditors. He had the ability and knowledge of the internal controls and how to manipulate them. Along with manipulating the internal controls, he also had the ability to manipulate his coworkers, Fraioli and Perfectto.
♣ One way Greater Providence Deposit & Trust could improve their control procedures over the disbursement of loan funds to minimize the risk of this type of fraud is to set up a training program or handbook that discusses this issue. The training program or handbook would discuss the proper control procedures such as depositing loan funds in a checking account in the borrower’s name or writing a check to the borrower. This way, Guisti would have had to present a photo identification when cashing the checks or withdrawing money from the …show more content…

♣ One way Greater Providence Deposit & Trust may improve their its loan review procedures at bank headquarters to minimize its fraud risk is to acquire a computer services arrangement at the headquarters, not at a neighboring bank or a bank out-of-state. This system should notify bank officials if a loan has been granted without a credit report or above the lending officer’s lending limit. These loans should then be examined by the internal auditors for fraud and unless there was prior approval to grant these loans; the lending officers should face consequences.
♣ There are pros and cons to rotating the assignments of loan review clerks. A pro would be that a loan review clerk and a lending officer couldn’t collude and create a fraud. But, a con in this case is that the rotation of review clerks made follow-up on questionable loans more

Open Document