Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of group dynamics case study
Analyze group dynamics
Comclusion about group dynamics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary of group dynamics case study
Reaction Section One: 1. Discussion of your personal reactions and experiences (thoughts, feelings, behaviors) during the session. Once again, I came into the group with the thoughts of not desiring to be there. I tend to feel a sense of dread each time I concern myself about one of the leaders. However, each time that I remain in the group I appreciate being with the other members. I just do not anticipate any progress for the group by one leader analyzing us each individually, without including other members in on the discussion. Attending to her misguided conclusions about me and some other members is disheartening. Today, I confronted the group leader and stated to her my feelings and observations. I indicated that I do not trust her, …show more content…
I realize that my feelings are my own and my perception becomes my reality, but I suppose she ought to help in some way for me to feel as if I am being heard. I was grateful when others in the group supported my viewpoint and the other leader took the spotlight off of me by asking me if we could move on to another subject. I felt sad and guilty for not wanting to acknowledge her for the rest of …show more content…
All other norms remained intact and abided by. *Therapeutic Factors: It was obvious that the group was experiencing the corrective recapitulation of the primary family group; however the corrective aspect was not present. The group leader, instead of empathetically trying to work out the issues with the member she seemed to propel the dysfunction forward with the way she spoke. Universality was present when certain individuals agreed they felt the same way as a troubled member. Altruism and interpersonal learning was also a factor by member support and validation of each other. * Group Development: An opportunity for the group to enter the working stage was missed by not exploring the conflict that was occurring. Focus did not have to remain on the individuals involved, but the subject still could have been addressed by the group on how the situation was effecting them in the here and now. Conflict in group seems to be minimized. However, the other leader may have wanted to protect the individual that was
Similarly, inferiority feelings may be challenged to offset the negative concepts and values that form the roots of social and emotional issues. Group therapy can facilitate the social context in which the participants may develop the sense of belonging and community. Some of the beneficial dynamics of the group are the identification between group members’ behavior, participants can benefit from others group members’ feedback, ability to help other and receive support from others members. The group enables the possibility of trying new behaviors and encourages the other students to take action over their lives. There are four stages in group therapy that correspond to four goals in counseling: first establishing and maintaining interconnected relationships with another student of the group; the therapy is based on the idea of equality between members, mutual respect, and identical involvement. The introduction of self-rule bases from the counselor, who is the mediator, is important. Both, students and counselor work together in the process to explore and look for positive change during the sessions (Corey,
Goals: the goal of this stage is to explore the feelings of the group members regarding group therapy. This is feedback from the members on the homework assignment that was given to them. Also, during this exploration, the registered counsellor will model ways of being empathetic (Seligman & Reichenberg, 2014) This is important as the group members will learn not to
The group and curriculum showed a support group dynamic. The facilitator led the group and provided ways to stimulate sharing, suggestions, and advice. He was able to provide support to individual participants and the group as a whole (Maguire, 2002). They read a book about a group of pigs that were doing a scavenger hunt to find a prize. One pig in particular didn’t listen to the instructions and in a humorous way he struggled to find the clues. He often would push others to get the next clue and other pigs were scared of him. The pig that didn’t listen had many struggles. It was resolved by the other pigs helping him, as well as the main character realizing what he should have done differently. Throughout the book the facilitator stopped and asked questions using the text and pictures. He added group empathy by adding their personal experiences to the
Group therapy is considered one of the most resourceful forms of therapy. The benefits to group therapy can be both cost-effective and a great means of support (Corey, Corey & Corey, 2014). The process of experiencing ideas and viewpoints expressed by your peers allows group members to become more susceptible to the counseling procedure. Group counseling also helps individuals to feel a sense of belonging due to similar situations and experiences shared by the group. The sense of support from group members can be an excellent means towards developing long-lasting relationships and developing communication skills needed to move forward during the counseling phase. In this paper, I will discuss my experiences throughout the group-counseling phase.
The group becomes “a reenactment of the family situation” (Toseland & Rivas, 2014, p. 59). The group is essentially a surrogate or second family for the members. For example, the leader may be seen as a father figure who has control over the group. (Toseland & Rivas, 2014). Members “form transference reactions to the group leader and to each other because of their early life experiences” (Toseland & Rivas, 2014, p. 59).
Many group members exemplified cohesiveness by offering their sympathy or empathy verbally and with therapeutic touch. This helped the group feel more connected to each
Johnson, D. (2011) A solution-focused approach to group dynamics in counselling: or, Sister Hazel explains it all for you [Web log post]. Retrieved April 7, 2014, from http://daviddeanjohnson.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/a-solution-focused-approach-to-group.html - See more at: http://reffor.us/index.php#sthash.btbwnyEP.dpuf. J. Spangaro, Personal Communication, April 10, 2014. Mojab, C. (2013).
Through the process of this class I have been able to reflect and analyze how I am as a leader as well as a co-leader in a group setting. I believe throughout this process of being part of a group as a member and leader has help me further define the roles that I will play in group counseling in the future. The evolution that I am seeing are an abundance of growth in areas that I thought I was already comfortable in such as being an active listener and co-leading. I see that there are more to becoming a powerful leader and facilitator. There are various aspects of becoming a well rounded group leader as learning the skills to endure especially building your endurance. Also, being able to take risks, being competent and confidence in your ability to lead a group of any sorts. Moreover, I have found that my communication style has shifted especially learning about the process in which you communicate your informal introduction as well as the lingo that is being used as a counselor. Also, the way in which we approach each member of
These particular chapters focusing on; theories and techniques of group counseling and the formation of a group, are centered around the need for a clear theoretical rationale in order to make sense of what occurs in the group, as well as the process of actually forming such a group. Furthermore, the ability to understand, conceptualize and describe what group leaders intend to accomplish in a group is vital. Additionally, I agree with the text in that an integrative approach to group counseling may be most compelling due to the flexibility it provides. Through an integrative framework, the incorporation of the feeling, thinking and doing dimensions of human behavior offer several advantages versus a single theoretical approach (Corey, Corey
From the beginning, where we were unfamiliar with each other and became a team, my team and I had started to learn each other name and getting to know each other. Throughout each meeting, we slowly start to feel more comfortable and open minded with each other. Not only are we getting familiar with each other, each meeting that was held we progress of becoming an effective team member, we learn our strengths and weaknesses of everyone. During the meetings, we learn many concepts from the textbook, “Communicating in Small Groups: Principles and Practices” by Steven A. Beebe and John T. Masterson. We were able to learn different types of concept in the textbook and utilized it as a team to complete certain tasks. The three concepts that impacted my team and I are human
In a team-oriented setting, everyone contributes to how well the group succeeds overall. You work with fellow members of the group to complete the work that needs to be done. Having the right people in the correct roles is an important factor in measuring the success of a team, where you are united with the other members to complete the main goals. Every group is made up of definite strengths and weaknesses. Our team's 3-5 major strengths necessary to work accordingly consist of Informer, Summarizer, Orienter, Piggy-Backer, and Encourager. One of our strengths as a team is that we get input from everyone involved. Every member of our team is a leader in some way. Part of being a good leader is knowing how important it is to receive the best ideas from each member of their team. We attend group meetings where we discuss any challenges, issues, and problems. At these meetings, we often exchange ideas or brainstorm new ones with each other and come up with the best and most creative team solutions as potential answers to those perceived problems.
For this to occur however, requires an understanding of culture and society, as well as governance and process. In addition, I have also understood the power of strength based approach, how strength based therapy used in relationships an essential factor among group members. I view this class as the opportunity to practice how effectively work with groups and individuals to understand their own inherent power. Therefore, I learned the way of using a strengths-based approach; I can highlight the assets of group members, offering building blocks which can then lay the foundation of their social change. Furthermore, I understand change could be a mutual process, so in group therapy until group members became comfortable with each other to share their experiences giving them space and later help them to engage in along with group process. I also learn how to help in the facilitation of change, by asking open questions, validating, empathic and allowing them to feel what they are feeling, and empower them what they wants to do with their current
Throughout this group project, I had an opportunity to observe and reflect how my personality traits contributed to and hindered the success of the team. According to the Big Five Model, I identify myself as low on extroversion, moderate on neuroticism as well as openness and high on agreeableness and conscientiousness.
I’m tired, a little stressed and disappointed with some of the group members this week. This has been the most challenging time in group so far. Everything is usually fine, but something is off this week. Although, we have group chats, our group cohesion is off. After, deciding to do the outline one way, we ended up doing it another way. That was cool until individuals brought the confusion. One person thought this way, the other thought that way. It was a mess. Our group dynamics were all over the place. The impact this had on me was very negative. With your help Mrs. Evans, we eventually decided to keep the outline simple. The other group members picked their duties, while mine were assigned to me. It did not bother me that I was assigned duties. Actually, my absence from the meeting helped to decide what I was to do. When it comes to the norming and forming of this group, I find myself at a loss for words. The norming process is off. There is less cohesion than usual; we have not been as effect this week. Also, relationships do not seem to be strengthening. This makes me angry because it affects us all. Unlike the norming stage, the forming stage is pretty solid. All of us are comfortable (in my opinion) giving our opinions, and we understand what is required of us. There is no need to form rules they are already in place. In my opinion, some of the members did not follow the rules. I for one broke a rule.
our thought process, and how we contribute to the process of group work. This involves a