Gregory Currie´s Does Great Literature Makes Us Better?

608 Words2 Pages

A debate has grown on whether reading is essential on making you a better person. The spark that started the fire was Gregory Currie’s article “Does Great Literature Makes Us Better?” which declares that the certainty that reading literature improves us as a people has “no compelling evidence that suggests that people are morally or socially better for reading Tolstoy”. In response to Currie’s claim Annie Murphy Paul weighed in with “Reading Makes Us Smarter and Nicer” where she states “in studies published in 2006 and 2009 that individuals who often read fiction appear to be better able to understand other people, empathize with them and view the world from their perspective”. Paul claims that “old fashioned reading from a book is more beneficial for our capacity for empathy and intellectual development than the superficial reading we do on the web scrolling through TMZ”, for example there are many benefits from reading a good book over reading an article just for entertainment. …show more content…

The reason I agree with Paul is because I fit right into the description of the person she is describing, one that doesn’t deep read, but in fact, does the superficial reading on the web. Coping with an everyday struggle of a weak vocabulary led me to think the reason is the fact that I don’t participate in the “deep-reading” pastime. Although I do try to participate, I would say my mind doesn’t allow me to access that place that allows my reading to slow and become enriched, which would give me time to establish an intimate relationship with the author like Paul

Open Document