Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Confidentiality principles
Situations of confidentiality
Situations of confidentiality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Confidentiality principles
The following arguments will be used by Greene’s Jewelry against the defendant; violation of None Disclosure Agreement (NDA) in both Federal and State laws and the countersuit for wrongful termination. Greene’s has the original signed NDA by the defendant, which can be used as evidence. This signed NDA can illustrate the defendant has violated the legally binding agreement she had agreed to while employed under Greene’s jewelry. Howell Jewelry is Greene’s competitor; their intention for hiring the defendant was solely to use confidential documents she had from her previous employer when she was terminated. In addition to violating the NDA, the defendant violated both federal and state versions of the New Hampshire Trade Secret Law, that “safeguards …show more content…
The social environment has a strong “influence on public perception” (InnovateUs, 2016). It is within the Greene’s Jewelry to keep this court case private from the general public, although it is rather hard to do because of outlets such as the media. After the process Greene’s Jewelry will have to make some adjustments to their company policies in order to help assure that the company cares about their reputation as well as fixing it. Greene’s Jewelry communication department needs to make sure that they make a point to state that the defendant had not been performing adequately to company standards and was not a really great employee. The defendant regularly showed up to work late, she was untrustworthy on account of stealing confidential documents and sold them to the competitor in exchange for a job, due to actions such as these, the defendant proved she was not a good employee. Greene’s needs to alter the public’s perception from negative to positive, the company must show the defendant not in a single mother light but in that of a bad, untrustworthy employee. Since Howell utilized the information that the defendant provided to make a similar product that resulted in profits, it is possible for Greene to bring suit against Howell but in an attempt to minimize the negative public perception it would be best to handle one suit at a time and table at this
...e terms and conditions the job entailed. I believe that Wal-Mart did accommodate Pam Huber’s disability needs by suggesting to her a different position to work in due to her downfall. If the company caused for her accident then they should accommodate for her disability and keep Pam Huber in her position but due to the fact that the accident happened on her own terms I do not think the company should be reliable for her disability and therefore Pam Huber should either accept and make the most out of her situation or leave the company. Based on all these factors I am defiantly in agreement with Wal-Mart and the district courts decision on ruling summery judgment in favor of Pam Huber.
On March 5, 2004, Martha Stewart, a successful business woman and the founder of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia was sentenced by the jury to five months in prison at a minimum-security federal prison, another five months of home confinement along with 19 months of probation and $30,00 fine. Stewart was found guilty on four counts in what seemed to be known as white-collar crime. In this paper, I will briefly explain, identify and answer respectively in order on the three topics of, what crime did Martha Stewart commit, what evidence did the jury appear to find most convincing and whether should Stewart have received prison time. I will be using my own ideas along with the researches from reputable and credible sources to support my ideas.
If there is a substantial proof that Ms. Smith choice of dressing violated the company’s dress code than it can be built as a claim of harassment, else it is not relevant and cannot
While the major ethical error of dumping the chemical is obvious, there are many ethical errors made by Pacific Gas and Electric that make this case compelling an a lesson on how not to act in business. On the flip side, even what Erin was doing could be considered unethical. She is not a lawyer, and should not have been handling a case like this. Obviously the law firm knew this but carried on anyways. It is even worse when she is fired but then hired back because of the papers that she has regarding the contamination by PG&E. This is bribery and a form of corruption which is easily unethical under any definition. Getting the job in the first case, by making the lawyer feel bad for ...
The appellants’ first claim alleges unfair competition from defendant’s business actions, which violated Sec. 43a of Lanham Act and Michigan common law. The equitable relief under both Michigan common law and Sec. 43a was noted the “likelihood of confusion” standard by the district court.
This article starts by talking about the rumor, and how it is affecting the company. After a certain point in time they could no longer keep devoting resources to the rumor so they entered a legal suit. They went to court with the first people that they thought they had enough evidence against. After that point the rumor died down but did not completely go away leaving the company to question how they could reach...
Tiffany argued that counterfeit merchandise bearing its name is sold on eBay and therefore they should be responsible for it, the web commerce company, does not itself put the items up for sale, and according to the case,
In the pleadings, a complaint needs to be filed by the plaintiff with the court and the defendants. In this case, the complaint was filed for wrongful death and injunctions. The complaint was given to both companies on May 14, 1982. Then, the defendants must answer within twenty-four hours of receiving the complaint to the summon or risk losing the case by default of the court. W.R. Grace denied the allegations against them. Also, their other defenses was that the complaint didn’t state any cause of action, in the complaint the company named was misnamed, the company followed the due of care at all times and acted in “good faith,” and the claims against them are barred. The next step is the methods of discovery.
As per request of the first assignment of this course, I watched the movie “A Civil Action” starring John Travolta (Jan Schlichtmann), as a plaintiff’s lawyer and Robert Duvall (Jerome Facher) and Bruce Norris (William Cheeseman) as the defendant’s lawyers of W.R. Grace and J Riley Leather companies. The movie depicted the court case fought in the 1980’s among the previously mentioned companies and the residents of Woburn a little town located in Massachusetts. After watching the movie, an analysis using the ethical tools reflected in the chapter 1 of the course textbook will be used to portray the ethical issues of the movie.
All defendants were happy with prevailing communication processes. Generally they were designated as “direct” and “open” with a prominence being noted on informal rather than formal channels. Shop floor personnel indicated being comfortable communicating with all levels of the company.
Hale was 60 years old when he was hired. Little did he know 4 years later he would be unemployed, the board informed Mr. Hale that he needs to leave the company he asked if he could stay on until the end of the year to retire with full benefits the board agreed. Mr. Hale was unhappy because he was forced into retirement, so he filed an age discrimination suit. While in court during the discovery he uncovers during a board meeting it was stated that Mr. Hale was too old. The courts ruled in favor for Mr. Hale and he could continue with his lawsuit, since the courts agreed with Mr. Hale APUSA settled the case (Gerber, 2011).
This essay is going to show the character from "The Diamond Necklace", and "Charles" made the wrong choices at the beginning but good and right choices in the end. The main character in "The Diamond Necklace" is a woman named Matilda Loisel. In the beginning of the story Madame Loisel was being selfish. She didn’t like the way she was living, she wanted to be rich. Madame Loisel should be happy with the way she's living. She thinks she's poor but she doesn’t know that there are others who are less fortunate than her. Madame Loisel was also jealous of other people because of their wealth and their happiness. She didn’t like her life, but she should be thankful and appreciative for what she has.
The Martha Stewart insider trading case was a high profile case filled with uncertainty. In order to say whether or not Stewart handled her indictment responsibly, it is necessary to start with an assumption regarding her guilt or innocence. For the purposes of this paper, based on the information I have read about the case, and based on the fact that she was found guilty of all counts (although not all specifications) in her stock conspiracy trial (with the exception of the security fraud charge which was thrown out), I will assume that she is guilty. (courttv.com) Based on that assumption, there are several reasons that Martha Stewart did not handle her indictment responsibly which can be summarized in a recap of the charges: she lied about receiving illegal information leading her to sell her stock, she lied about having a prearranged agreement to sell her stock when it fell below $60 per share, she tried to hamper the investigation by providing false information, and she worked with her broker to obstruct justice and make false statements regarding the scandal. (chicagotribune.com) As the CEO of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSLO) and as a successful businesswoman motivated to protect her own personal interests, it might be easy to understand the temptation behind her decisions, but the discussion here will be based on whether or not her decisions were responsible.
Consumer rights and consumer law are designed to hold sellers of goods and services accountable when they seek to profit by taking advantage of a consumer’s lack of information or bargaining power (The Law, n.d.). Consumer rights laws exist at both the federal and state level, and they are enforced by government agencies, offices of attorneys general and through individual and class action lawsuits filed by victims, who are the diamond consumers in this case (The Law, n.d). Consumer Protection Act in the State of Texas is called Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), which is located in Chapter 17 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code (The DTPA, n.d.). The DTPA protects the consumers who purchase a new product in Texas by giving
"The Necklace" or "The Diamond Necklace" is a short story by Guy De Maupassant, first published on 17th, February 1884, in the French newspaper Le Gaulois. The story has become one of Maupassant's popular works and is well known for its ending. It is also the inspiration for Henry James's short story, "Paste". It has been dramatised as a musical by the Irish composer Conor Mitchell; it was first produced professionally by Thomas Hopkins and Andrew Jenkins for Surefire Theatrical Ltd at the Edinburgh Festival in 2007.