Great Expectations Critical Analysis

1034 Words3 Pages

Women in literature and the roles they play as characters have fascinated critics and readers alike. In my opinion, one of the most interesting critical interpretations of Great Expectations has been from feminist and gender studies critics, such as Hilary Schor and William Cohen. While both critics adhere to opposite interpretations of the novel, both critics shed new light on females’ roles in Dickens’ famous novel. Hilary Schor’s article, “If He Should Turn to and Beat Her” has pioneered a new wave of thinking regarding Estella’s characterization. At first glance, Estella is seen as a cold and distant character, much like an evening star offers beauty to be admired without any true warmth. However, Schor’s interpretation of the novel …show more content…

During a conversation with Pip regarding the possible suitor Bentley Drummle. When Pip finds himself frustrated that Estella would dare do such a thing in front of him, Estella remarks, “’Do you want me then,’ said Estella, ‘to deceive and entrap you?’” (Dickens 290). Undoubtedly, Estella tries her best to warn Pip that she has been programmed by Miss Havisham to deceive men and ensnare them for her benefit. While she makes this goal clear in her statement, Estella also leaves many readers questioning whether or not Estella is purely evil. If Estella is simply a cold, heartless woman, she would care little to warn Pip. In fact, she would care little for Pip, period. Therefore, this scene supports Schor’s idea that Estella is a woman with her own identity and that Estella does care deeply for Pip regardless of how he views her. Further, the second ending of Great Expectations continues to reinforce the idea that there is much more to Estella than a cold, mechanical personality. Schor says, “But in the second ending, when Estella says suffering has been stronger than all other teaching, has taught her to understand what his [Pip’s] heart used to be and that she has been bent and broken,” Estella seems to “step out from the mists here into the ‘broad expanse of …show more content…

Relying on the motif of hands that often shows up throughout the novel, Cohen explains that the hands serve as a symbol of the sexual oppression those living during the Victorian Era experienced. In his article, Cohen explains that “for the Victorian reader, the hand would immediately be available both as a site of sexual signification and as a dangerous sexual implement” (576). For example, during a dinner with Wemmick and Miss Skiffins, Pip notices strange and forbidden actions taking place at the hands (pardon the pun) of Wemmick and Miss Skiffins’s hands. Dickens writes, “I [Pip] observed a slow and gradual elongation of Mr. Wemmick’s mouth, powerfully suggestive of his slowly and gradually stealing his arm round Miss Skiffins’s waist” (278). Readers will notice that Wemmick takes his time slowly easing his arm around his fiancé’s waist, smiling as he accomplishes his feat. Just like a child quietly sneaking a cookie before dinner, Wemmick illustrates the same attitude—he knows that what he is doing is downright scandalous for the Victorian era, yet he cannot resist letting his hands explore. As a result, Wemmick’s “forbidden touch” alludes to the idea of the “forbidden action” of sex in Victorian England. Furthermore, the satisfaction Wemmick feels from managing to hold Miss Skiffins also

Open Document