Three Branches Of The Government Research Paper

Keeping the three branches and system of checks and balances prevents absolute tyranny from grasping control of our nation. Additionally, allowing for a dictatorship goes against everything America stood for during its creation. As a democracy, the United States needs to grant a voice to the people, because their opinions need considering when the federal government addresses issues. Moreover, balancing power and responsibilities amongst the government system makes it less prone to error and helps prevent dictatorial intentions. However, despite the fact that using only one branch allows for a more efficient system, our U.S. government still divides power as the founding fathers intended, so everyone gains representation and a voice, while

In many situations, when a person runs a nation alone, bias in opinions arises, and there exist times when such sided thoughts prove fatal to the leader and his country. An article regarding why Hitler lost World War II explained, “Other than his sociopathic homicidal views, Hitler made really bad decisions.” Choosing to blame Hitler’s management skills as the reason for why the country failed, the article backs up the claim that depending on others in a democracy only betters a government. Not to forget, multiple jobs and responsibilities in the government get split across the three branches, with the legislative branch making laws, executive branch enforcing them, and judicial branch interpreting laws, so the president’s workload lessens. The Harvard Business Review once wrote an explanation of job sharing and its benefits, explaining that lessening the amount of work done improves its quality. Therefore, on a larger scale, reducing the amount of work the president does allow him to improve its quality, bettering the overall country. Finally, using multiple branches holds a balance and avoids polarizing the government between terms for each president. “The demise of Stalin and Mao reveals the stumbling block that the Nazis would have eventually faced too: succession.” Written by the George Mason University in a paper known as “The Totalitarian Threat, the line establishes a clear fact. Even if the current leader leads the country into success, there is no way they prepare for their succession. Therefore, if a horrifying, revolting president that never listens to his citizens replaces a kind and caring one, the government still functions just fine in a democracy. With three branches, the U.S. government almost always acts morally and with precision, for the burden of leading a country