Good Vs Evil In Beowulf

916 Words2 Pages

Throughout history, literature has portrayed a variety of character arcs. This ranges from the vengeful hero to the sympathetic villain to the chaotic anti-hero. Yet the further back through time written works go, the simpler the characters portrayed. In the Seamus Heaney translation of Beowulf, the characters of Beowulf and Grendel are the least complex version of heros and villains ever created. They fall under all the typical traits of these arcs. Beowulf is strong, vain, and seeks further enlightenment via the path of endless adventure. There are no qualities he possesses that may indicate any depth to his beliefs or weaknesses. The same can be seen in the character of Grendel. Simply put, he is the incarnation of evil. The concept of good vs evil is portrayed in Beowulf …show more content…

Examples of characters that do portray this are Thor from the Avengers franchise, Raoul from Phantom Of The Opera, and even Jesus in Jesus Christ Superstar. All of these heros share traits with Beowulf, like being selfless, courageous, and a tad narcissistic. Yet they all also have other defining characteristics, ranging from selfishness to persistent to holier than thou. Beowulf is by all means the perfect hero, and that in and of itself is why he is not the ideal character. He is too perfect. Even when he does have a flaw, such as the tendency of breaking swords during fights, it is explained “...his hand was too strong, the stroke he dealt / … would ruin it” (2686-2687). These sort of characters in modern media are seen as jokes or for young children. If Beowulf was written today, it would just be an obscure book that would be sold among the harlequin novels in grocery stores across the nation. This does shows the evolution of literature, and how an epic poem from over a thousand years ago could be a masterpiece, yet similar modern stories can not hold up to the current literary

Open Document