Collin’s objective in Good to Great is to show how companies have gone from good to great. Disciplined thought and creating a culture of discipline are the significant components that gave momentum to the companies who have gone from good to great. Collins conducted a research team of students over a span of five years to do research, interviews, and collecting data that would reveal how disciplined thought and action moved companies forward within a time frame of fifteen years. (The eleven good to great companies the research was drawn upon were Abbott, Circuit City, Fannie Mae, Gillette, Kimberly-Clark, Kroger, Nucor, Philip Morris, Pitney Bowes, Walgreens and Wells Fargo. These were compared with elven other companies that were good but no great)
In order to have disciplined thought, a company must have disciplined leadership and employees. This takes place during what Collins calls the build up stage. The build up stage is usually a long tedious process that requires hard work and perseverance, meaning to say that a company does not become great over night. In the build up stage, level 5 leaders have been proven to be the most successful in bringing a company from good to great. The Level five leaders are the ones who are not afraid of
…show more content…
The fox acts fast and runs around trying to find various ways to attack the hedgehog. The hedgehog on the other hand, approaches the attack one way only, which is by rolling. Simply by rolling around, the fox gets tricked to-and fro in its “various ways” strategy, and the fox will eventually have to give the victory to the hedgehog and flee. By being the hedgehog and utilizing the three circles to the best of their abilities, the companies lived up to their CEO’s vision of success. Focusing on a simple plan and not always searching for a variety of brilliant plans kept the flow of great companies providing goods/services on a consistent basis and saw
In Jim Collins book Good to Great, we explore the notion of being rigorous, not ruthless. “To be ruthless means hacking and cutting, especially in difficult times, or wantonly firing people without any thoughtful consideration.” (GTG, p. 52) In stark contrast, rigorous companies are no walk in the park, but the difference between the two styles is night and day. Rigorous companies adopt a top down approach when it comes to hiring management. There is an old saying that says a “fish rots from the head down.” This is analogous to a business hiring the wrong leadership and the business failing as a result of the poor hiring decisions in leadership. I think that successful companies, especially moving forward will
When Jim Kilts showed up at Gillette in 2001, the first outsider to run the Boston-based company in more than 70 years, he found a business with great brands losing market share. Its acquisitions of Duracell and Braun were not delivering. Sales and earnings were flat, the company had missed its earnings estimates for 15 straight quarters, the stock had plummeted, and Wall Street had lost patience. Yet two-thirds of the top managers were getting top ratings. People were being rewarded for effort; performance, under Mr. Kilts regime, became the new measure.
Studer, Q. (2003). Hardwiring Excellence: Purpose Worthwhile Work Making a Difference. 1st Edition, Gulf Breeze, FL: Fire Starter Publishing.
Many people believe that in order to succeed in a business that is having difficulties, it is important to focus on a particular area in order to be better productive in each of them, and be able to reach the goal. Instead, Goldratt and Jonah demonstrates that is important to focus on the company as a whole, but at the same time, it shows that it is incorrectly to only focus in an specific manufacturing department, or one plant, or a department within the plant, because people should not be concerned in local optimums.
Many organizations have developed written statements known as Mission and vision statements, which support employee performance and motivation strengthening the organizations culture and helping reach goals. Some organizations promote high performance restructuring by dedicating the introduction of a team approach to work structuring, and high skill variety and feedback on performance, which results in job characteristics and improved satisfaction. Organizations nowadays are forced to pay extra attention to their employees’ needs and customers’ needs by means of employee recognition, goal alignment and work force engagement. For teams to be engaged and effective, members must feel appreciated, and believe in their leaders (Dixion & Hart, 2010). Organizational culture obtained with Path-goal theory is equivalently important because appropriate culture is required to sustain or facilitate established high performance efforts. With high employee performance and goal alignment organizations use management by objective (MBO) an integrative approach for management that supports the attainment of customer satisfaction through wide variety of tools and procedures that the end result will be higher quality of goods and services achieving business excellence (Evans J
“THE GOAL” by Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox is about Alex Rogo, who’s not only battling family issues at home but as being a manager over a plant, has also noticed that their profits have been declining over the last few months. Alex then was told he had months to help the company to get back on track or the company will shut down. Alex then reunites with an old physics instructor from college names Jonah, who helps him realize his future goals for the company and the measures that need to be implicated, in order to save the company.
In Jim Collins book, Good to Great, Collins discusses the difference between the different stages of leadership. A level 1 leader is a highly capable individual who makes positive contributions and has talent, knowledge, and skills. A level 2 leader builds off of a level 1 leader by bringing these positive traits into a team setting. Next, a level 3 leader is a competent manage that can organize people towards a positive outcome. Fourth, a level 4 leader is a leader that has an insatiable drive and commitment to a vision or goal and strives for professional success. However, in order to be a level 5 leader, one must have all these traits, plus the most important trait of all, personal humility. A level 5 leader is one that blends their professional will for success with an
At this level in the pipeline the leader must hold a high level of maturity as a leader. This maturity can be characterized by the leader’s ability to have empathy, good judgment and should develop strong listening skills with the ability to interpret all the information they receive (Ram Charan). Additionally, these leaders must be able to see things in the long run as well as appreciate the short term objectives. Moreover, the level of maturity needed at this management level requires the individual to think, not like a functional member of the organization, but as a businessman (Ram Charan). These leaders must view all the decisions they make in a holistic way and seek out a strategic
In this book, Maxwell identifies the 5 stages that one can attain as they climb the organizational ladder. Briefly they are: Level one, “Position”, this is the starting point for everyone. You are now the “boss” but people will only follow you because they
The company’s approach to motivate employees has been working in a positive way. The employees are satisfied with the family style community, and the productivity has increased as well. The company’s style of treating employees as important partners has been successful in other manufacturing companies too. For example, when Honda opened its first factory in the U.S., the CEO and employees shared the same cafeteria, just like Lincoln.
Collins, J., & Porras, J. I. (2002). Built to last: Successful habits of visionary companies. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Quirus, E. (2013). Creating an Environment for Your Team to Strive. Strategic Finance, 95(10), 20-22.
The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement is a very popular and bestseller book in management section. Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox wrote the book in 1984. It comes in 390 pages. It published by The North River Press. In 20 years, over than three million copies were sold, translated into 21 languages and taught in over 200 collages. The way the book is written was like telling a story although the contents are science. That is because the author thinks it is the best way for education.
This essay will discuss the relevance of Taylor’s principles of scientific management to organizations today with reference to an example business, which will be McDonalds. McDonalds are renowned for their fast paced working environments and high standard of management putting them among some of the best businesses in the world that have the best leadership (Allen, 2011).
By allowing for employees to be increasingly engaged in workplace activities, they are then given the opportunity to develop new skills. Most leaders also encourage for employees to participate in team building activities so that any employee would be more comfortable and have stronger chemistry when working with other members of their respective departments, and with other employees in the company as a whole. Leaders are capable of motivating their subordinates through a series of actions, such as words of encouragement, acts of appreciation, and allowing for employee involvement in key decision making processes in the company. For instance, leaders who appreciate, constantly encourage and assist in the improvement of the tasks performed by their subordinates will be able to build a strong and healthy employer-employee relationship. This good relationship instils the traits of confidence in employees and motivates them to enhance their performance. Excellent leaders commonly try to develop a dialogue or establish open communication with their subordinates. Employees who are well