Gloria Anzaldua Vs. Richard Rodriguez

697 Words2 Pages

People will act very different depending on their surroundings; each must quickly evaluate what version of identity is to be shown. There are two types of identity, social and personal identity; identity is what makes someone, but identity can also be seen as reputation. Identity is also what makes someone who they are. Regardless of what you’re trying to show, personal and social identities tend to crossover. Gloria Anzaldua and
Richard Rodriguez interpret their identities in very different matters, but both correlate to who they are. Gloria is someone empowered and takes on her heritage; while Richard is someone who is ashamed and rejects his heritage. In order to be your whole self, you need accept both your personal and social identity …show more content…

“It was unsettling to hear my parents struggle with
English” (Rodriguez 3). He states, how it makes him uncomfortable to hear his family try to speak the English language because his parents don’t know how to speak the language. Rodriguez also states, “it was more troubling for me to hear my parents speak in public” (3). In this part of the story he particularly says how his parents Spanish was not for the public. He finds comfort in the English language, even acceptable.

Reyes 2
While Gloria Anzaldua, a Mexican writer spoke about her social identity crisis that had happened while in college. She states, “Wild tongues can’t be tamed, they can only be cut out” (Anzaldua 34). This occurs when she is taking a speech class to remove her accent in college against her will, i was some sort of a college requirement. Her being so in love with her language and culture, she used that analogy to show the agony and how unfair it was to her and others like her. “If you don’t like it, go back to Mexico where you belong”(Anzaldua 34). This quote states that if she didn’t assimilate into their flawed view of normality and acceptability, she didn’t belong there. This is …show more content…

She had her social identity taken like her sense of belonging. It had a direct effect on her self-esteem. In Henri Tajfels’s Social identity theory states, that a person’s idea of who they are are directly affected by the groups they’re in. When they feel that they belong, it impacts their way of being, self-esteem, and pride positively. On other hand, if a group around them rejects a person, it impacts them in an extremely negative way. The way a person feels they belong. This means that America had something against Anzaldua’s social identity. So when the Pan American University tried stripping her of her accent, they were robbing her of social identity that was apart of whom she was.
Social and personal identity are juxtaposed. Each identity having their own sets of differences, both come down to developing the person’s character. Rodriguez, who avoids and shames his Spanish background, would have fit in to the speech class
Anzaldua was in because of his hatred for his background and the form of how he grew up. Anzaldua would have loved an intense and dominant Spanish background that

Reyes

Open Document