George Orwell Shooting And Elephant Summary

679 Words2 Pages

Molly Mims
Professor Jordan
Philosophy 2100
5 November 2014

Stage 1: Choose a Topic & Summarize Your Chapter

Shooting and Elephant By George Orwell

In Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell has to decide between killing an elephant who went on a rampage through the streets, or to let him continue roaming in a near by field since he is not threatening to harm anyone at the moment. George Orwell was a non-educated Burma police officer, and was an obvious target for many people in the town. He thought that imperialism, the expansion of a country’s power, was an evil concept. Orwell wanted to forgo his job as a police officer. Then one day he got a call about an escaped elephant that was wondering through the bazaar. Suddenly after hearing shrieks …show more content…

Peter Singer is aiming for the equality of animals and not just people. Logical reasoning is evident that both men and women have the capability to vote, whereas animals do not. If a human’s equality were based strictly off certain demands we would have to put a halt to requiring equality because there are too many factors that create differences between human beings. For example, communication skills are different among all types of people. Utilitarian Jeremy Bentham values each person the same despite their differences. He brings up a good point and says that in order for you to suffer and like doing a particular task you have to find your personal interest in it. Giving more attention to those with the same skin color as goes against the concept of equality. Not to mention that the main interaction we humans have with animals usually occurs at a meal. Humans do not intend to harm animals, but in order for our bodies to survive and flourish we have to rely on certain meat production and consumption methods. In Stanley Benn’s article Egalitarianism and Equal Consideration of Interests, he does not think that the characteristics of humans are anywhere near equal to an animal such as a dog. The general argument of this essay takes sides with the human population because we are also

Open Document