Gentiles: The Jerusalem Council

1745 Words4 Pages

Novelist Pearl Buck says, “If you want to understand today, you had to search yesterday.” For most people like me, to study history is tiresome, its boring, it's lifeless, even a waste of time, but in reality, there are certain truths and absolute truths that we can only attain by studying history. Philosopher, essayist, poet and novelist George Santayana already gave us a warning regarding history, he said, “Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.” In this brief essay, let us will take up some key issues and turning points in the early church history and learn from it.
Beyond Judaism. The Jerusalem and uncircumcised Gentiles. Some Jewish Christians were taught that Gentiles had to observe the Mosaic Law and Jewish customs …show more content…

There are groups still teaching that Christians must obey the Old Testament Law. Whether it is the Sabbath day or the food laws or all of the Old Testament Law outside of the sacrificial system. There are groups that declare observance of the Law is either required for salvation, or at least a crucially important aspect of the Christian life. Sadly, these groups either completely ignore or grossly misinterpret the decision of the Jerusalem Council. The specific goal of the Jerusalem Council was to decide what aspects, if any, of the Old Testament Law Christians, must observe. The Jerusalem Council, for the sake of association with the Jewish and Gentile cultures, said that the Gentiles should abandon their former pagan practices associated with idolatry. There was no mention of the Sabbath whatsoever. Further, the Jerusalem Council made it abundantly clear that these rules were not requirements for salvation by reaffirming that salvation is by grace for both Jews and …show more content…

The issue of the Montanist use of prophecy. It was not the idea of prophecy that caused great distress in the church. It was the manner in which they prophesied. They had departed from the biblical measures of prophecy, both in content and in the way in which they expressed their prophecies. Today in some churches we see the use of exaggerated expressions or speaking in tongues. Though tongues were not the issue, instead, the use of the tongue and the prophecy was the issue. However, the tongue should be used to converse natural languages. Either way, whether prophesying, or speaking in tongues, God’s purpose in giving us gifts was for us to glorify Him, to exalt and worship Him, and to proclaim His words understandably. The prophecy was intended to be understandable and comprehensible for the benefit of the church. Tongues were meant to translate the prophecy so that they could be understood for the edification of the church. These gifts were to be used properly and in an orderly manner, a requirement that Montanus and his followers failed to

Open Document