Galen Strawson's Arguments Against Narrativity

789 Words2 Pages

Galen Strawson argues against narrativity by describing the way he sees his life – episodically. I argue that he is not neutral in his description of narrativity and episodicity and that this weakens his claim. Narrativity, according to Galen, is when one sees one’s life as a story or a narrative. Contrarily, episodicity is when one sees one’s life in episodes and does not construe these episodes to form a narrative . Strawson specifically claims that not everyone lives his or her life as a narrative, and he is against the idea that “a richly Narrative outlook is essential to a well-lived life” . In order for his claim to be supported, he must give both sides of each argument and, therefore, remain neutral. Although he attempts to stay …show more content…

He clearly states that “the Narrative tendency to look for story or narrative coherence in one’s life is, in general, a gross hindrance to self-understanding” . According to Strawson, being narrative does not provide a solid perception of self-understanding. He argues that narratives require one to look back on times in one’s life, and that these recalled stories may not always be accurate. He provides neurophysiological evidence to state that the more one recalls a memory, the more that memory is falsified. This, in turn, shows fault in the idea of narrativity. He says that, “The implication is plain…the more you…narrate yourself, the further you risk moving away from accurate self-understanding” . Of course, people who see their lives as episodic will not have this problem because they have no intention of recalling their lives as a story. This implies that people who see their lives episodically have a better self-understanding and, therefore, are better than those who see their lives narratively. This weakens Strawson’s main claim because it does not provide neutral examples to give both sides of the argument; instead, it clearly promotes

Open Document